IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,281,290
Granted Patent B2
US 12,281,290 · App. 18/598,606 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Systems and methods for measuring mat density of aquatic biomass

Inventors: Geoffrey Mangalam (San Marcos, CA); Maurits Van De Ven (San Marcos, CA); Fedor Kuzminov (San Marcos, CA); Edward Chen (San Marcos, CA); Sheldon Compton (San Marcos, CA); Matthew McAuliffe (Vista, CA)
Assignee: Plantible Foods Inc.
C12M21/02C12M31/10C12M41/06G01N21/534G01N21/59G01N21/85G01N33/487
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,281,290
App. No.
18/598,606
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided are methods, devices, and systems for measuring aquatic biomass in an aqueous liquid, optionally for the cultivation, growth optimization, and harvest of an aquatic biomass for plant protein production. In particular, measurements of aquatic biomass density are based on light absorption of the aquatic biomass. The aquatic biomass includes an aquatic organism such as Lemna , including Lemna minor . The plant protein isolates include a RuBisCO protein.

Claims (55)

1. A method for measuring aquatic biomass, the method comprising:

flowing aqueous liquid and aquatic biomass in a pond;

measuring light absorption of a portion of the aquatic biomass, wherein the measuring comprises use of a measurement device, wherein the measurement device comprises:

a shield, wherein the shield obstructs flow of the biomass in an area adjacent to a shield; and

light intensity sensors, wherein the light intensity sensors comprise at least three light intensity sensors, wherein the light intensity sensors collect measurements of light intensity:

at a comparator region located above a surface of the aqueous liquid;

at a flow obstruction region located below a surface of the aqueous liquid in an area substantially free of an aquatic biomass; and

at a biomass region located below a surface of the aqueous liquid; and

determining a value for mass, surface area, density, or combinations thereof of the aquatic biomass in the pond.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining further comprises calculating, based on light intensity, the light absorption of a portion of the aquatic biomass.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the light intensity sensors comprise optical sensors.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors each comprise a light meters lux meter, a UV meter, a photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) sensor, a camera, or a combinations thereof.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors measure photometric units.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors measure lumens per unit area.

7. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors measure lux or lumens per square meter.

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors comprise lux meters.

9. The method of claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors comprise light meters.

10. The method of claim 4 , wherein the camera comprises a digital camera, non-digital camera, integrated camera, single camera, dual camera, timer-specific camera, or combinations thereof.

11. The method of a claim 3 , wherein the optical sensors comprise photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) sensors.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the light intensity sensors measure light absorption at 10 nanometers to 400 nanometers wavelength.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the light intensity sensors measure light absorption at 400 nanometers to 700 nanometers wavelength.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the light intensity sensors measure light absorption at 750 nanometers to 10,000 nanometers wavelength.

15. The method of claim 2 , wherein a light intensity differential is obtained from measurements of light intensity.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein a light intensity differential calculated from a difference between a ratio of light intensity at a comparator region located above a surface of the aqueous liquid to light intensity at a biomass region below a surface of the aqueous liquid in an area not substantially free of an aquatic biomass, and a ratio of light intensity at a comparator region located above a surface of the aqueous liquid to light intensity at a biomass region below a surface of the aqueous liquid in an area in that is substantially free of an aquatic biomass.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the light absorption is calculated from the light intensity differential.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein an aquatic biomass measurement is related to the measurement of light absorption.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the measurement is density.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the measurement is value of mass.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein the measurement is surface area.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the flow is a circulating flow.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises the use of one, two, three, four, five, or more measurement devices.

24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the light intensity sensors to collect measurements of light intensity communicate data measurements to an imaging system or a computer system adapted to process the data, wherein the processing comprises calculations.

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the value for mass, surface area, density, or combinations thereof of the aquatic biomass in the pond is determined from one or more device.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aquatic biomass comprises Lemna minor.

27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aquatic biomass comprises an aquatic photosynthetic organism.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises a member of the Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Chrysophyta, Euglenophyta, Euglenozoa, Paeophyta, Porphyra , Pyrrophyta, Rhodophyta, or Xanthophyta phylum, or combinations thereof.

29. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises a member of the Caulerpaceae, Chlorophyta, Chrysophyta, Chrysophyceae, Cryptophyceae, Dinophyceae, Euglenophyceae, Fucaceae, Florideophyceae, Gigartinaceae, Gracilariaceae, Laminariaceae, Lemnaceae, Salviniaceae, Monostromataceae, Phaeophyceae, Ulvaceae, Xanthophyceae, or algae family, or combinations thereof.

30. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises a member of the Ankistrodesmus, Asteromonas, Azolla, Carteria, Chlamydomonas, Chlorella, Chlorococcum, Chlorogonium , Chlorophyceace, Chrysosphaera, Dunaliella, Euglena, Fucus, Furcellaria, Gracilaria, Haematococcus, Laminaria, Landoltia, Lemna, Macrocystis, Monoraphidium, Monostroma, Nannochloropsis, Neochloris, Oedogonium, Ochromona, Oscillatoria, Pelagomonas, Phormidium, Pleurococcus, Porphyra, Pyrobotrys, Sargassum, Scenedesmus, Selenastrum, Spirodela, Spirulina, Volvox, Wolffia , or Wolffiella genus, or combinations thereof.

31. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises Lemna.

32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the Lemna comprises Lemna aequinoctialis, Lemna disperma, Lemna ecuadoriensis, Lemna gibba, Lemna japonica, Lemna minuta, Lemna obscura, Landoltia punctata, Lemna perpusilla, Lemna tenera, Lemna trisulca, Lemna turionifera, Lemna valdiviana, Lemna yungensis, Spirodela polyrhiza, Wolffia arrhiza, Wolffia globosa.

33. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises Azolla, Azolla caroliniana, Azolla cristata, Azolla filiculoides, Azolla imbricata, Azolla nilotica, Azolla pinnata, Azolla rubra , or combinations thereof.

34. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises Ascophyllum nodosum, Botrydium, Caulerpa, Chondrus crispus , Euglenoids, Fucus, Fucus crispus, Fucus serratus, Fucus vesiculosus, Furcellaria lumbricalis, Gracilaria parvispora, Gracilaria tikvahiae, Laminaria digitata, Laminaria farlowii, Laminaria hyperborean, Laminaria nigripes, Macrocystis pyrifera, Monostroma kuroshiense, Monostroma latissimum, Monostroma nitidum, Prymnesium parvum, Palmaria palmata, Saccharina latissima, Tribonema, Ulva intestinalis, Vaucheria , or combinations thereof.

35. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises duckweed, duckweed fern, mosquito fern, water fern, fairy moss, and algae, or combinations thereof.

36. The method of claim 27 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises lesser duckweed, minute duckweed, gibbous duckweed, common duckweed, ivy duckweed, least duckweed, Valdivia duckweed, rockweed, gutweed, green algae, golden algae, golden brown algae, golden brown algae and diatoms, fire algae, red algae, yellow-green algae, brown algae, single-cell algae, microalgae, macroalgae, kombu, kelp, sugarkelp, grass kelp, giant kelp, bladder kelp, sea oak, knotted kelp, knotted wrack, sea lettuce, serrated wrack, carrageen, forked seaweed, brown seaweed, dulse, dulce sol, or combinations thereof.

37. The method of claim 36 , wherein the aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises a floating aquatic photosynthetic organism.

38. The method of claim 1 , wherein the density comprises mat density.

39. The method of claim 38 , wherein mat density is from about 750 g/m 2 to about 1500 g/m 2 .

40. The method of claim 37 , wherein the floating aquatic photosynthetic organism comprises a Lemna species.

41. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aquatic biomass comprises a thickness of about 0.1 millimeters to about 5 millimeters.

42. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aquatic biomass comprises a weight of about 100 grams per meter squared to about 3000 grams per meter squared.

43. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of optimizing a growth of the aquatic biomass, wherein the method comprises adjusting a mass, surface area, or density, of the aquatic biomass based on the calculated mass, surface area, or density, thereby optimizing the growth of the aquatic biomass or aquatic photosynthetic organism.

44. The method of claim 43 , wherein optimizing the growth of the aquatic biomass comprises adjusting aquatic biomass over a time interval.

45. The method of claim 43 , wherein optimizing the growth of the aquatic biomass comprises adjusting aqueous liquid turbidity.

46. The method of claim 43 , wherein optimizing the growth of the aquatic biomass comprises adjusting temperature, pH, nutrients, flow, light intensity, light spectrum, and time interval.

47. The method of claim 43 , wherein method further comprises harvesting the aquatic biomass.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2025
From: MCAULIFFE, MATTHEW
To: PLANTIBLE FOODS INC.
Reel/Frame 070533/0836 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2024
From: VAN DE VEN, MAURITS; MANGALAM, GEOFFREY; KUZMINOV, FEDOR; CHEN, EDWARD; COMPTON, SHELDON
To: PLANTIBLE FOODS INC.
Reel/Frame 068809/0455 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 4, 2024
From: VAN DE VEN, MAURITS; MANGALAM, GEOFFREY; KUZMINOV, FEDOR; CHEN, EDWARD; COMPTON, SHELDON
To: PLANTIBLE FOODS INC.
Reel/Frame 067006/0211 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2022076040 · Sep 7, 2022
Provisional Application 63241627 · Sep 8, 2021
Related Publication 20240263114A1 · Aug 8, 2024
References Cited (129)
US 4087566A · Kim · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4338340A · Morimoto · 1982 [cited by applicant]
US 6033895A · Garger · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7337782B2 · Thompson · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 8529976B2 · Mcmindes · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8685707B2 · Ploechinger · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9175052B2 · Gerardi · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9301544B2 · Mua · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9655376B2 · Ergun · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10039306B2 · Vrljic · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10172380B2 · Varadan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10457906B2 · Green · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10745682B2 · Sebastian · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10757964B2 · Ford · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10798950B2 · Walther · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10834959B2 · Ford · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20040247760A1 · Howsam · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060288449A1 · Garger · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080181990A1 · Ledbetter · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090151240A1 · Kayama · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100003741A1 · Fromson · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100136201A1 · Bigeard · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120011090A1 · Tang · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120100901A1 · Kirsch · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120117869A1 · Javan · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120155714A1 · Douglass · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150133636A1 · Xenopoulos · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150335043A1 · De Jong · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160029663A1 · Gerardi · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160192697A1 · Mua · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170105438A1 · Ajami · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170164651A1 · Mua · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180020676A1 · Taghavi · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180362957A1 · Sebastian · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190021390A1 · Ford · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190133163A1 · Varadan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190259108A1 · Timo · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190364948A1 · Tetrick · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200022946A1 · Brener · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200347376A1 · Sebastian · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210022387A1 · Ford · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210177000A1 · Schmitt · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259290A1 · Ajami · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210347818A1 · Lihme · 2021 [cited by applicant]
AU 2018256629B2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 104596448B · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 108487205B · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109137864B · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110271650A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 111199195A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 210827402U · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111903323A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 110271650B · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 112376514A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 212714866U · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 212772269U · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 114751484A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
EP 3011836A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015002751A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018131414A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019010105A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008043147A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010144877A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011078671A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013096700A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014004018A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014104880A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014165769A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015153666A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016201379A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018008030A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020143515A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021007484A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021008680A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021034980A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023039419A2 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024136679A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Buyel et al., Flocculation increases the efficacy of depth filtration during the downstream processing of recombinant pharmaceutical proteins produced in tobacco, Plant Biotechnol J, 2014, vol. 12, p. 240-252. [cited by applicant]
Gregory et al., Adsorption and flocculation by polymers and polymer mixtures, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci, 2011, vol. 169, p. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2023/060574, mailed Oct. 25, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Torkata et al., Protein Coagulation through Reversible and Irreversible Bindings of Calcium, Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, 1987, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 707-714. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/076040, mailed Jul. 19, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Abckroos, Water Lentil Protein Concentrate, BRS Biorefinery Solutions, 1 pg, Oct. 1, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, Plantible Foods, Plant-based nutrition for all Humanity, 2018, p. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Balasubramanian et al., “Recycling of biogas-plant effluent through aquatic plant ( [cited by applicant]
Cole et al., “Population genetic structure in duckweed ( [cited by applicant]
Compeer et al. Interreg Vlaanderen-Nederland, Applications of proteins, amino acids and starch from duckweed, Avans University of Applied Sciences, 2018, p. 1-21. [cited by applicant]
Cui et al., “Growing duckweed for biofuel production: A review,” Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2015, 17 Suppl 1, pp. 16-23. [cited by applicant]
Deckers, et al., “Structuring Processes for Meat Analogues,” Trends Food Sci. Technol., 2018, 81, pp. 25-36. [cited by applicant]
Douillard et al., Leaf protein for food use: potential of Rubisco, New and Developing Sources of Food Proteins, 1994, p. 307-342. [cited by applicant]
Edelman et al., Nutrient Value of Leaf vs. Seed, Frontiers in Chemistry, 2016, vol. 4, p. 1-5. [cited by applicant]
Erb et al., Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation, Nat. Comms., (2016), vol. 7, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Ferreira et al., An accurate method to quantify ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase content in plant tissue, Plant, Cell and Environ. 2000, vol. 23, p. 1329-40. [cited by applicant]
Ferreira et al., Immunological Exercises for Beginners, Biochemical Education, vol. 24, p. 176-178. [cited by applicant]
Ferreira, Sulfur Starvation in Lemna Leads to Degradation of Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase without Plant Death, J. Biol. Chem., 1992, vol. 267, p. 7253-57. [cited by applicant]
Godfray et al., Meat consumption, health, and the environment, Science, 2018, vol. 361, eeam65324, p. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Haustein, et al., “Compensatory growth in boiler chicks fed on Lemna gibba,” British Journal of Nutrition, 1992, vol. 63, pp. 329-335. [cited by applicant]
Immonen, et al., “Texturization of a Blend of Pea and Destarched Oat Protein Using High-Moisture Extrusion,” Foods, Food Engineering and Technology Section, 2021, vol. 10(1517), p. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2020/041525, mailed Dec. 3, 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/025737 mailed Oct. 5, 2022. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2022/078017, mailed Aug. 15, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Ishizawa et al., “Evaluation of environmental bacterial communities as a factor affecting the growth of duckweed [cited by applicant]
Kalburgi, Evaluation of RuBisCO extraction methods using the aquatic plant, [cited by applicant]
Kinsella, Functional Properties of Proteins, Possible Relationship Between Structure and Function in Foams, Food Chemistry, 1981, vol. 7, p. 273-288. [cited by applicant]
Libouga et al., Thermal denaturation and gelation of rubisco: effects of pH and ions, Int. J. Biological Macromolecules, 1996, vol. 19, p. 271-77. [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., “Large-scale screening and characterisation of Lemna aequinoctialis and Spirodela polyrhiza strains for starch production,” Plant Biol (Stuttg), 2018, vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 357-364. [cited by applicant]
Machovina et al., Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat consumption, Science of the Total Environment, (2016), vol. 536, p. 419-431. [cited by applicant]
Mardanov et al., Complete Sequence of the Duckweed ( [cited by applicant]
Martin et al., Characterization of Heat-Set Gels from RuBisCo in Comparison to Those from Other Proteins, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2014, vol. 62, p. 10783-91. [cited by applicant]
Maung et al., “Asian Perspective on High-Moisture Extrusion,” Cereal Foods World, 2020, vol. 65, p. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Mestameyer et al., Solar Energy Conversion Efficiency and Growth Aspects of the Duckweed, [cited by applicant]
NCBI, Large subunit of riblose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (chloroplast), Accession No. YP-001595516, retrieved from internet Aug. 24, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Nieuwland et al., Isolation and Gelling Properties of Duckweed Protein Concentrate, ACS Food Sci Technol, 2021, vol. 1, p. 908-916. [cited by applicant]
Oron et al., “Effect of wastes quality on treatment efficient with duckweed,” Water Sci. Technol., 1989, vol. 21, pp. 639-645. [cited by applicant]
Osen, et al., “High Moisture Extrusion Cooking of Pea Protein Isolates: Raw Material Characteristics, Extruder Responses, and Texture Properties,” J. Food Eng., 2014, 127, pp. 67-74. [cited by applicant]
Phan-Xuan et al., Hydration-Induced Structural Changes in the Solid State of Protein: A SAXS/WAXS Study on Lysozyme, Mol. Pharmaceutics, 2020, vol. 17, p. 3246-3258. [cited by applicant]
Rusoff et al., Duckweeds ( [cited by applicant]
Steinfeld et al., Livestock's Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options, (2006) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. [cited by applicant]
Stomp, “The duckweeds: a valuable plant for biomanufacturing,” Biotechnol Annu Rev., 2005, vol. 11, pp. 69-99. [cited by applicant]
Thermo Scientific, Protein stability and storage, Thermo Scientific, 2009, p. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Van De Velde II, From waste product to food ingredient: The extraction of abundant plant protein RuBisCo, New Food Magazine, 2011, Issue 2, Article, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Vermaat et al., “Performance of common duckweed species ( [cited by applicant]
Vymazal “Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment,” Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 14-21. [cited by applicant]
Wendeou, et al., “Influence of Salinity on Duckweed Growth and Duckweed Based Wastewater Treatment System,” Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013, vol. 5, pp. 993-999. [cited by applicant]
Whitepaper, Water Activity [aw] in Foods, Safefood 360, Inc., 2014, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Wittek, et al., “High Moisture Extrusion of Soy Protein: Investigations on the Formation of Anisotropic Product Structure,” Foods, 2021, vol. 10, p. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Yin et al., “The influence of light intensity and photoperiod on duckweed biomass and starch accumulation for bioethanol production,” Bioresour Technol., 2015, vol. 187, pp. 84-90. [cited by applicant]
Yu, et al., “Comparative analysis of duckweed cultivation with sewage water and SH media for production of fuel ethanol,” PLoS One, 2014, p. 1-15, e115023. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, et al., “Converting Peanut Protein Biomass Waste into “Double Green” Meat Substitutes Using a High-Moisture Extrusion Process: A Multiscale Method to Explore a Process for Forming a Meat-Like Fibrous Structure,” … [cited by applicant]