IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,619,258
Granted Patent B2
US 12,619,258 · App. 18/602,942 · Granted May 5, 2026

Systems and methods for aircraft landing guidance during GNSS denied environment

Inventors: Arpan Vasavada (Ujjain, IN); R Harsha Niyogi (Bangalore, IN); Chiranjeevi Kamireddy (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
G05D1/654B64D45/08G05D1/242G05D1/243G05D1/245G05D1/248G05D2109/20G05D2111/10G05D2111/30G05D2111/52
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,619,258
App. No.
18/602,942
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system comprises a GNSS sensor onboard an aerial vehicle; a monitor warning system (MWS) that determines whether the vehicle is in a GNSS denied environment; and a flight management system that includes a landing guidance module, and a database having location coordinates of landing sites. Onboard vision sensors and a radar velocity system (RVS) communicate with the guidance module. When the MWS determines that the vehicle is in a GNSS denied environment, the guidance module calculates an optimal flight path by receiving image data from the vision sensors; receiving position, velocity and altitude data from the RVS; receiving location coordinates of a landing site; processing the image data, and the position, velocity and altitude data, to determine a location of the vehicle and provide 3D imaging of a route to the landing site; and calculating a flight path angle to the landing site, using vehicle and landing site coordinates.

Claims (26)

1 . A system comprising:

a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) sensor onboard an aerial vehicle;

a monitor warning system in operative communication with the GNSS sensor, the monitor warning system operative to determine whether the aerial vehicle is in a GNSS denied environment where GNSS signals are weak or lost, such that GNSS signal strength falls below a user selected threshold level;

a flight management system onboard the aerial vehicle, the flight management system including at least one processor that hosts a landing guidance module, and a navigation database that includes location coordinates of one or more landing sites;

one or more vision sensors mounted on the aerial vehicle and in operative communication with the landing guidance module;

a radar velocity system (RVS) onboard the aerial vehicle and in operative communication with the landing guidance module, the RVS operative to obtain a set of parameters that comprise:

position, velocity and altitude data for the aerial vehicle; and

depth mapping data and ground avoidance data for a surrounding environment; and

an inertial navigation system onboard the aerial vehicle and in operative communication with the RVS;

wherein when the monitor warning system determines that the aerial vehicle is located in a GNSS denied environment, the landing guidance module is activated and is operative to calculate an optimal flight path by a process that comprises:

receive image data from the one or more vision sensors, the image data corresponding to one or more terrain images over which the aerial vehicle is traveling;

receive the position, velocity and altitude data for the aerial vehicle from the RVS and the inertial navigation system;

receive the depth mapping data and the ground avoidance data from the RVS;

receive location coordinates of a landing site selected by a user from the navigation database;

process the image data, the position, velocity and altitude data, and the depth mapping data, to determine a real time location of the aerial vehicle and provide three-dimensional (3D) imaging of a route to the landing site; and

calculate a landing flight path angle with respect to the landing site when the aerial vehicle approaches the landing site, using current location coordinates of the aerial vehicle and the location coordinates of the landing site.

2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the flight management system further includes a nearest landing site algorithm operative to provide an optimal landing site based on a state of the aerial vehicle and availability of landing locations.

3 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the landing guidance module is further operative to receive depth and velocity estimates from the RVS to calculate an optimal flight path angle.

4 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the landing guidance module is operative to send a guidance path based on the optimal flight path angle to an automatic flight control system (AFCS) on the aerial vehicle, wherein the AFCS is configured to follow the guidance path to perform a safe landing of the aerial vehicle at the landing site.

5 . The system of claim 3 , wherein the landing guidance module is operative to provide a guidance path based on the optimal flight path angle to a pilot of the aerial vehicle, such that the pilot can follow the guidance path to perform a safe landing of the aerial vehicle at the landing site.

6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more vision sensors include one or more infrared (IR) cameras.

7 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a display system configured to receive multiple inputs, including a 3D camera view for providing accurate guidance and situational awareness to a pilot.

8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the display system is configured to show a guidance path based on an optimal flight path angle calculated by the landing guidance module, and announce a message when the landing guidance module is activated.

9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the aerial vehicle is a crewed aircraft.

10 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the aerial vehicle is an uncrewed aircraft.

11 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the aerial vehicle comprises a vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft, or an urban air mobility (UAM) vehicle.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2024
From: VASAVADA, ARPAN; NIYOGI, R HARSHA; KAMIREDDY, CHIRANJEEVI
To: HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Reel/Frame 066765/0965 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 202411002069 · Jan 11, 2024 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250231571A1 · Jul 17, 2025
References Cited (24)
US 9939524B2 · Winstead · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10488512B1 · Pounds · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10677916B2 · Laplace et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012289A1 · Petit · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200341117A1 · Sandford · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210264798A1 · B · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210319709A1 · Rose et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210405654A1 · Ulun et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230045232A1 · Enda · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230105148A1 · Ophir · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230117700A1 · Auillans et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230237915A1 · Mizumoto · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240194081A1 · Hammond · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20250054175A1 · Bowman · 2025 [cited by examiner]
CN 107703759A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111649737A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 113359782B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 112347840B · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 116380057A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
GB 2172462A · 1986 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021038485A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Doer et al., “Radar Based Autonomous Precision Takeoff and Landing System for VTOLs in GNSS Denied Environments”, 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) Athens, Greece, Sep. 1-4, 2020, pp. 92… [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, “Extended European Search Report”, dated May 28, 2025, from EP Application No. 24221507.7, from Foreign Counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 18/602,942, pp. 1 through 12, Published: EP. [cited by applicant]
Wei et al., “Autonomous Navigation for eVTOL: Review and Future Perspectives”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 9, No. 2, Feb. 2024, pp. 4145 through 4171. [cited by applicant]