IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,583,579
Granted Patent B2
US 12,583,579 · App. 18/614,202 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Systems and methods for flight control of aircraft

Inventors: Abhishek Vaidya (San Jose, CA); Nathan Thomas Depenbusch (Mountain View, CA); Jenner Grey Richards (Sunnyvale, CA); Fernanda Aline Matta De Paiva (Los Altos Hills, CA)
Assignee: Archer Aviation Inc.
B64C29/0033B64C11/46B64C13/50B64D27/34B64D45/00G01C23/005B64D2221/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,583,579
App. No.
18/614,202
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to systems and methods for flight control of aircrafts driven by electric propulsion systems and in other types of vehicles. In some embodiments, an aircraft is disclosed, comprising: at least one electric propulsion unit; at least one sensor configured to measure at least one aircraft condition; and at least one flight control computer configured to dynamically vary at least one torque command to the at least one electric propulsion unit based at least on the at least one aircraft condition; wherein the at least one electric propulsion unit is configured to generate thrust based on the at least one dynamically varied torque command.

Claims (42)

1 . An aircraft, comprising:

one or more electric propulsion units;

one or more sensors configured to measure one or more aircraft conditions; and

at least one flight control computer configured to perform a preemptive action to dynamically vary one or more torque commands to the one or more electric propulsion units based at least on the one or more aircraft conditions and using at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic to preemptively account for limitations of the one or more electric propulsion units, wherein the at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic comprises at least one of a rotating component inertia, an aerodynamic characteristic of a propeller, or an incidence angle of air around a propeller, and wherein the one or more electric propulsion units are configured to generate thrust based on the one or more dynamically varied torque commands.

2 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flight control computer is configured to adjust, but not configured to independently control, a blade pitch of the one or more electric propulsion units.

3 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the aircraft is a hybrid aircraft using an electric-based energy source and a fuel-based energy source to power the one or more electric propulsion units.

4 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are determined based on one or more flight control laws.

5 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on power transferred to or from one or more batteries of the aircraft.

6 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are generated by the at least one flight control computer.

7 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on at least one of a high speed protection limit or a low speed protection limit associated with a speed of a propeller of each electric propulsion unit of the one or more electric propulsion units.

8 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on a phase of flight.

9 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more torque commands are dynamically varied based on one or more fixed characteristics of the aircraft.

10 . The aircraft of claim 9 , wherein the one or more fixed characteristics include at least one of a fixed propeller limit or a fixed propulsion unit limit.

11 . The aircraft of claim 9 , wherein the one or more fixed characteristics include a mass of a gearbox of each electric propulsion unit of the one or more electric propulsion units.

12 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions include at least one of an airspeed, air density, propeller speed, or propeller airflow.

13 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the at least one flight control computer is configured to cause the one or more electric propulsion units to tilt between forward thrust and vertical lift configurations.

14 . The aircraft of claim 13 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions include one or more tilt angles associated with the one or more electric propulsion units.

15 . The aircraft of claim 14 , wherein each tilt angle of the one or more tilt angles is linked to a blade pitch associated with an electric propulsion unit of the one or more electric propulsion units.

16 . The aircraft of claim 13 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions include an airflow associated with a tilt angle of each electric propulsion unit of the one or more electric propulsion units.

17 . The aircraft of claim 13 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions include a blade pitch of each electric propulsion unit of the one or more electric propulsion units.

18 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on at least one of: an engine torque rate limit, a battery power limit, an HV bus power limit, or a battery temperature.

19 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are dynamically varied in flight.

20 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on at least one pilot input.

21 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions include an air density.

22 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more aircraft conditions is based on a propeller acceleration constraint.

23 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more torque commands are dynamically compensated torque commands.

24 . The aircraft of claim 23 , wherein the dynamically compensated torque commands preemptively account for limitations of at least one of the one or more electric propulsion units.

25 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on a difference between a steady state condition and a dynamic condition.

26 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the one or more dynamically varied torque commands are based on a dynamics compensation gain component.

27 . The aircraft of claim 26 , wherein the dynamics compensation gain component is determined based on at least one of a mass of the one or more electric propulsion units, a density ratio, or a torque margin.

28 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the preemptive action is determined based on a propeller speed protection function.

29 . The aircraft of claim 28 , wherein the propeller speed protection function is determined based on a propeller acceleration limit.

30 . The aircraft of claim 28 , wherein the propeller speed protection function is determined based on a propeller minimum speed protection limit.

31 . The aircraft of claim 28 , wherein the propeller speed protection function is determined based on a propeller maximum speed protection limit.

32 . The aircraft of claim 1 , wherein the aircraft conditions comprise an air density.

33 . A computer-implemented method comprising, measuring one or more aircraft conditions;

performing a preemptive action to dynamically vary one or more torque commands to one or more electric propulsion units based at least on the one or more aircraft conditions and using at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic to preemptively account for limitations of the one or more electric propulsion units; wherein the at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic comprises at least one of a rotating component inertia, an aerodynamic characteristic of a propeller, or an incidence angle of air around a propeller; and

causing the one or more electric propulsion units to generate thrust based on the one or more dynamically varied torque commands from a flight control computer of an aircraft.

34 . A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing one or more instructions that, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

measuring one or more aircraft conditions;

performing a preemptive action to dynamically vary one or more torque commands to one or more electric propulsion units based at least on the one or more aircraft conditions and using at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic to preemptively account for limitations of the one or more electric propulsion units; wherein the at least one of an engine or propeller characteristic comprises at least one of a rotating component inertia, an aerodynamic characteristic of a propeller, or an incidence angle of air around a propeller; and

causing the one or more electric propulsion units to generate thrust based on the one or more dynamically varied torque commands.

Assignments (2)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF ASSIGNEE TO ARCHER AVIATION INC. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 67847 FRAME 477. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Mar 18, 2026
From: VAIDYA, ABHISHEK; DEPENBUSCH, NATHAN THOMAS; RICHARDS, JENNER GREY; DE PAIVA, FERNANDA ALINE MATTA
To: ARCHER AVIATION INC.
Reel/Frame 075244/0852 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2024
From: VAIDYA, ABHISHEK; DEPENBUSCH, NATHAN THOMAS; RICHARDS, JENNER GREY; DE PAIVA, FERNANDA ALINE MATTA
To: ARCHER AVIATION INC.
Reel/Frame 067847/0477 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63504958 · May 30, 2023
Related Publication 20240400213A1 · Dec 5, 2024
References Cited (49)
US 5001646A · Caldwell et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5839690A · Blanchette · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5890441A · Swinson · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 9764833B1 · Tighe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9898033B1 · Long · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10364036B2 · Tighe et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10399673B1 · Roop · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10450062B1 · Bova · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11142333B1 · Richter et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11216012B2 · Youmans · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11299287B1 · Moy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11407506B2 · Poh et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11411474B1 · White et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11427305B1 · Wiegman · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11640179B2 · Zwiener et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11932386B2 · Baharav · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11983017B2 · Seiferth et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11993370B2 · Wu · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 12330783B1 · Szmuk · 2025 [cited by examiner]
US 20020153452A1 · King et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040093130A1 · Osder et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20100076625A1 · Yoeli · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138270A1 · Christensen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150344134A1 · Cruz Ayoroa · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160229547A1 · Fisher · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190291862A1 · Lyasoff et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190332125A1 · Irwin, III et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200277073A1 · Thomassin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200333805A1 · English et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210309392A1 · Wiegman · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210331794A1 · Burns · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210350046A1 · Bosson et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220315205A1 · Moy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220334595A1 · Famularo et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230312119A1 · Eto · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20230382546A1 · Freiheit · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240059409A1 · Tonet Fleig · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240175400A1 · Zatorski · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240183316A1 · Park · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240199225A1 · Cole · 2024 [cited by examiner]
EP 3891067B1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020180373A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020240567A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2024/021149 dated Jul. 9, 2024 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Walker, G., et al., “F-35B Integrated Flight-Propulsion Control Development”, 2013 international powered lift conference, 2013, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vigano, L., et al., “Development of augmented control laws for a tilt rotor in low and high speed flight modes”, European Rotorcraft Forum, 2017, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Denham, J., et al., “Converging on a precision Hover control strategy for the F-35B STOVL aircraft.”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2006, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Whittle, R., “Flying The Osprey Is Not Dangerous, Just Different: Veteran Pilots”, Breaking Defense, Sep. 5, 2012, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kang, Y., et al., “Development of flight control system and troubleshooting on flight test of a tilt-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle”, International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 17.1, 2016, p. 120-131, 12 pa… [cited by applicant]