Indicator of cooling system suitability
Method and system provide visual means to assess the suitability of using a potential system with a target system. The data regarding the target system and one or more potential systems to be used with the target system may be displayed. For each potential system, and for each of one or more criteria regarding the potential system, a suitability level is determined may be represented on a display with a visual indicator, e.g., green, yellow, or red. Thus, the display provides a visual indication of the suitability of the potential systems across the range of criteria.
1 . A method of displaying relative system suitability on a display comprising:
receiving first data regarding a target system;
receiving second data regarding a first potential system;
determining a comparison factor using a coolant distribution unit (CDU) efficiency from the second data and a quantity of heat transmitted by the target system determined from the first data;
determining using the first data, the second data and the comparison factor, a first suitability level associated with using the first potential system with the target system, the first suitability level representing a first indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
causing a first dynamic visual indicator representative of the first suitability level to be displayed on the display.
2 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
determining, using the first data and the second data, a second suitability level representing a second indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
causing a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
receiving third data regarding a second potential system;
determining for the second potential system, using the first data and the third data, a third suitability level representing third indicia of how the second potential system will perform with the target system; and
causing a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein each suitability level is indicated using the dynamic visual indicators as one of low risk, medium risk or high risk.
5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the low risk is represented by a first color of the dynamic visual indicators, medium risk is represented by a second color of the dynamic visual indicators and high risk is represented by a third color of the dynamic visual indicators.
6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
using the comparison factor to determine the first suitability level for the first potential system; and
using the comparison factor to determine the second indicia of performance for the first potential system.
7 . A system comprising:
one or more processors; and
a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a plurality of instructions, which when executed, cause the one or more processors to:
receive first data regarding a target system;
receive second data regarding a first potential system;
determine a comparison factor using a coolant distribution unit (CDU) efficiency from the second data and a quantity of heat transmitted by the target system determined from the first data;
determine using the first data, the second data and the comparison factor, a first suitability level associated with using the first potential system with the target system, the first suitability level representing a first indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a first dynamic visual indicator representative of the first suitability level to be displayed on a display.
8 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of instructions further cause the one or more processors to:
determine, using the first data and the second data, a second suitability level representing a second indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
9 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of instructions further cause the one or more processors to:
receive third data regarding a second potential system;
determine for the second potential system, using the first data and the third data, a third suitability level representing third indicia of how the second potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
10 . The system of claim 9 , wherein each suitability level is indicated using the dynamic visual indicators as one of low risk, medium risk or high risk.
11 . The system of claim 10 , wherein the low risk is represented by a first color of the dynamic visual indicators, medium risk is represented by a second color of the dynamic visual indicators and high risk is represented by a third color of the dynamic visual indicators.
12 . The system of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of instructions further cause the one or more processors to:
use the comparison factor to determine the first suitability level for the first potential system; and
use the comparison factor to determine the second indicia of performance for the first potential system.
13 . A computer program product, comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium having computer-readable program code embodied therein to be executed by one or more processors, the program code including instructions to:
receive first data regarding a target system;
receive second data regarding a first potential system;
determine a comparison factor using a coolant distribution unit (CDU) efficiency from the second data and a quantity of heat transmitted by the target system determined from the first data;
determine using the first data, the second data and the comparison factor, a first suitability level associated with using the first potential system with the target system, the first suitability level representing a first indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a first dynamic visual indicator representative of the first suitability level to be displayed on the display.
14 . The computer program product of claim 13 , wherein the program code includes further instructions to:
determine, using the first data and the second data, a second suitability level representing a second indicia of how the first potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
15 . The computer program product of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of instructions further cause the one or more processors to:
receive third data regarding a second potential system;
determine for the second potential system, using the first data and the third data, a third suitability level representing third indicia of how the second potential system will perform with the target system; and
cause a second dynamic visual indicator representative of the second suitability level to be displayed on the display.
16 . The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein each suitability level is indicated using the dynamic visual indicators as one of low risk, medium risk or high risk.
17 . The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the low risk is represented by a first color of the dynamic visual indicators, medium risk is represented by a second color of the dynamic visual indicators and high risk is represented by a third color of the dynamic visual indicators.
18 . The computer program product of claim 14 , wherein the plurality of instructions further cause the one or more processors to
use the comparison factor to determine the second indicia of performance for the first potential system.