IP Library Granted Patent US 12,390,366
Granted Patent B2
US 12,390,366 · App. 18/653,821 · Granted Aug 19, 2025

Hydrodissection and posterior capsule opacification prevention during capsulotomy procedure

Inventors: Christopher Guild Keller (El Cerrito, CA); Thomas Haynes McGaffigan (Saratoga, CA); Kevin L. Waltz (Indianapolis, IN); Thomas Milton McNicholas (Laguna Niguel, CA)
Assignee: Centricity Vision, Inc.
A61F9/00754A61B18/08A61F2/16A61F9/008A61M1/77A61B2018/00291A61B2018/00321A61B2018/00601A61F2009/00889
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,390,366
App. No.
18/653,821
Granted
Aug 19, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the invention provide hydrodissection and/or PCO prevention or reduction in a patient undergoing eye surgery. In one embodiment, the invention is a surgical device for cutting and excising a portion of tissue, for example in performing a lens capsulotomy. A capsulotomy tip is inserted into an eye through an incision in the surface of the eye. The capsulotomy tip includes a suction cup to provide suction to the lens capsule. Then suction is applied via the suction cup to secure the capsulotomy tip to the eye. In some embodiments, after the capsulotomy tip is secured to the lens capsule, a cutting element of the capsulotomy tip is used to cut a tissue of the eye. Fluid is pushed through the capsulotomy tip and the capsulotomy tip is removed from the eye. Moreover, disclosed is an intraocular lens (IOL) to be used in conjunction with the surgical device.

Claims (36)

1. A surgical device comprising:

a circular suction cup comprising a channel formed by an inner wall, an outer wall, and a roof of the suction cup;

a stem coupled to the suction cup, the stem including a lumen that opens into the suction cup via the channel;

an electrical cutting element mounted on an underside of the suction cup; and

a dispenser coupled to the lumen of the stem, the dispenser configured to dispense a predetermined amount of fluid through the lumen to the suction cup, wherein the dispenser comprises:

a housing including a bottom surface and a side surface, a track disposed on the side surface of the housing;

a roller configured to move along the track of the housing;

a compliant surface disposed on the bottom surface of the housing; and

a tube disposed between the roller and the compliant surface, the tube of the roller dispenser in fluid communication with the lumen of the stem, wherein the tube is configured to allow fluid to flow through the roller dispenser when the roller is at a first end of the track, wherein the roller is configured to clamp the tube as the roller is advanced along the track, and wherein after the tube is clamped by the roller, the roller is configured to push a fluid disposed inside the tube as the roller is further advanced along the track towards a second end of the track.

2. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the electrical cutting element includes an electrical lead, the electrical lead configured to send an electrical pulse to the electrical cutting element to cause a shrinkage of collagen fibers of tissue.

3. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the suction cup forms a seal with a membrane of an eye of a patient.

4. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the roof has a ring shape.

5. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the suction cup comprises:

a baffle disposed near the stem, the baffle for equalizing a flow rate around the suction cup.

6. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the compliant surface is composed of a foam material to allow the roller to be advanced along the track up to the second end of the track after the roller has clamped the tube.

7. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the compliant surface is composed of a soft material that allows the compliant surface to be compressed by a force exerted when the roller is clamping the tube.

8. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the dispenser is configured to dispense a volume of fluid between 0.02 milliliters and 1.0 milliliter.

9. The surgical device of claim 1 , wherein the fluid hydrodissects a capsule away from a lens of an eye of a patient.

10. A surgical device comprising:

a circular suction cup including a plurality of standoffs on an inner membrane of the suction cup, wherein the suction cup includes a channel formed by an inner wall, outer wall, and roof of the suction cup, and the inner membrane is coupled to the inner wall;

a stem coupled to the suction cup, the stem including a lumen that opens into the suction cup;

an electrical cutting element mounted on an underside of the suction cup, the electrical cutting element configured to cause a shrinkage of collagen fibers of tissue; and

a dispenser coupled to the lumen of the stem, the dispenser configured to dispense a predetermined amount of fluid through the lumen to the suction cup, wherein the dispenser comprises:

a housing including a bottom surface and a side surface, a track disposed on the side surface of the housing;

a roller configured to move along the track of the housing;

a compliant surface disposed on the bottom surface of the housing; and

a tube disposed between the roller and the compliant surface, the tube of the roller dispenser in fluid communication with the lumen of the stem, wherein the tube is configured to allow fluid to flow through the roller dispenser when the roller is at a first end of the track, wherein the roller is configured to clamp the tube as the roller is advanced along the track, and wherein after the tube is clamped by the roller, the roller is configured to push a fluid disposed inside the tube as the roller is further advanced along the track towards a second end of the track.

11. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the electrical cutting element includes an electrical lead, the electrical lead configured to send an electrical pulse to the electrical cutting element.

12. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the suction cup forms a seal with a membrane of an eye of a patient.

13. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the roof has a ring shape.

14. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the suction cup comprises:

a baffle disposed near the stem, the baffle for equalizing a flow rate around the suction cup.

15. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the compliant surface is composed of a foam material to allow the roller to be advanced along the track up to the second end of the track after the roller has clamped the tube.

16. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the compliant surface is composed of a soft material that allows the compliant surface to be compressed by a force exerted when the roller is clamping the tube.

17. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the dispenser is configured to dispense a volume of fluid between 0.02 milliliters and 1.0 milliliter.

18. The surgical device of claim 10 , wherein the fluid hydrodissects a capsule away from a lens of an eye of a patient.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2024
From: KELLER, CHRISTOPHER GUILD; MCGAFFIGAN, THOMAS HAYNES; WALTZ, KEVIN L.; MCNICHOLAS, THOMAS MILTON
To: MYNOSYS CELLULAR DEVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 067312/0323 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 3, 2024
From: MYNOSYS CELLULAR DEVICES, INC.
To: CENTRICITY VISION, INC.
Reel/Frame 067312/0636 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 18164506 · Feb 3, 2023
Continuation 16257477 · Jan 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62721182 · Aug 22, 2018
Provisional Application 62624696 · Jan 31, 2018
Related Publication 20240285432A1 · Aug 29, 2024
References Cited (35)
US 4736836A · Alongi et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5066297A · Cumming · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 6186148B1 · Okada · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6217543B1 · Anis · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 8157797B2 · Boukhny · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8702698B2 · Keller · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10206816B2 · Keller · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11596547B2 · Keller · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 12004999B2 · Keller · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020072795A1 · Green · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040260254A1 · Neilson · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20060212038A1 · Boukhny · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080221500A1 · Sniegowski et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090088734A1 · Mordaunt · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100286651A1 · Sorensen · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100312232A1 · Jia et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130197548A1 · Keller · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140207137A1 · Keller · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160143778A1 · Aljuri · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170347877A1 · Frey · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014047478A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Auffarth, G. et al., “Comparison of Nd: YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, or acrylic intra-ocular lenses in four European countries,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Jul. … [cited by applicant]
Buehl, W. et al., “Long-term effect of optic edge design in an acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification,” J Cataract Refract Surg, 2005, vol. 31, pp. 954-961. [cited by applicant]
Findl, O. et al., “Long-term Effect of Sharp Optic Edges of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification,” Ophthalmology, 2005, vol. 112, pp. 2004-2008. [cited by applicant]
Kohnen, T. et al., “Optic Edge Design as Long-term Factor for Posterior Capsular Opacification Rates,” Ophthalmology, Aug. 2008, vol. 115, No. 8, pp. 1308-1314. [cited by applicant]
Nishi, O. et al., “Effect of intraocular lenses on preventing posterior capsule opacification; Design versus material,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Oct. 2004, vol. 30, No. 10, pp. 2170-2176. [cited by applicant]
Nishi, O. et al., Inhibition of migrating lens epithelial cells at the capsular bend created by the rectangular optic edge of a posterior chamber intraocular lens, Ophthalmic Surg Lasers, Jul. 1998, vol. 29, No. 7, pp. … [cited by applicant]
Nishi, O. et al., “Preventing lens epithelial cell migration using intraocular lenses with sharp rectangular edges,” J Cataract Refract Surg, Oct. 2000, vol. 26, pp. 1543-1549. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/US2019/015311, Apr. 23, 2019, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schaumberg, D.A. et al., “A Systematic Overview of the Incidence of Posterior Capsule Opacification,” Ophthalmology. 1998, vol. 105, No. 7, pp. 1213-1221. [cited by applicant]
Tetz, M. et al., “New Hydrophobic IOL Material and Understand the Science of Glistenings,” Current Eye Research, 2015, vol. 40, No. 10, pp. 969-981. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 16/257,477, filed Aug. 5, 2022, 35 pages. [cited by applicant]
Waltz, K.L. et al., “Precision Pulse Capsulotomy: Initial Clinial Experience in Simple and Challenging Cataract Surgery,” JCRS, 2017, vol. 43, pp. 606-614. [cited by applicant]
Wormstone, M., “Posterior Capsule Opacification: A Cell Biological Perspective,” Exp. Eye Res., 2002, vol. 74, pp. 337-347. [cited by applicant]
United States Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/164,506, filed Dec. 19, 2023, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]