IP Library Granted Patent US 12,326,096
Granted Patent B2
US 12,326,096 · App. 18/660,309 · Granted Jun 10, 2025

Core turning system

Inventors: Bradley C. Schafer (Ellington, CT); Brian V. Winebrenner (Vernon, CT); Jason B. Solomonides (Cromwell, CT); Marc J. Muldoon (Marlborough, CT); John P. Virtue, Jr. (Middletown, CT)
Assignee: RTX CORPORATION
F01D25/36F01D21/04F05D2270/114
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,326,096
App. No.
18/660,309
Granted
Jun 10, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A bowed rotor prevention system includes a gas turbine engine, and electric motor, and a core turning controller. The gas turbine engine includes a rotor that is rotatably coupled to a drive shaft. The electric motor is rotatably coupled to a motor shaft, which is mechanically coupled to the drive shaft so as to rotate therewith. The core turning controller in signal communication with the electric motor. The core turning controller determines whether a rotor bow is present in the rotor based on an operating time of the gas turbine engine, determines a motoring time based on the operating time, and invokes an anti-rotor bowing mode configured to control the electric motor to rotate the rotor according to the motor time.

Claims (35)

1. A bowed rotor prevention system comprises:

a gas turbine engine including a rotor that is rotatably coupled to a drive shaft;

an electric motor rotatably coupled to a motor shaft, the motor shaft mechanically coupled to the drive shaft so as to rotate therewith; and

core turning controller in signal communication with the electric motor, the core turning controller configured to determine whether a rotor bow is present in the rotor based on an operating time of the gas turbine engine, to determine a motoring time based on the operating time, and to invoke an anti-rotor bowing mode configured to control the electric motor to rotate the rotor according to the motor time,

wherein in response to invoking the anti-rotor bowing mode, the core turning controller is configured to perform one of a first anti-bowing technique to prevent the rotor bow from forming in the rotor, or a second anti-bowing technique that removes the rotor bow present in the rotor, and

wherein the core turning controller performs the second anti-bowing technique in response to a deactivation of the core turning motor before the motoring time expires.

2. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 1 , wherein the first anti-bowing technique includes determining a most recent operating time of the gas turbine engine, and calculating the motoring time which is indicative of an amount of time during which the rotor is rotated to prevent the rotor bow from forming.

3. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 2 , wherein the core turning controller divides a full rotation of the rotor into a number of equal steps and controls the motor such that it rotates the rotor through an alternating series of rotations and pauses over the full rotation.

4. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 3 , further comprising a time clock unit in signal communication with the core turning controller and configured to monitor the motoring time and to output a timing signal indicative of the motoring time.

5. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 4 , wherein the core turning controller is configured to deactivate the electric motor in response to the timing signal indicating that the motoring time is expired.

6. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 5 , wherein the core turning controller initiates engine startup of the gas turbine engine in response to determining the motoring time is expired.

7. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 2 , wherein the second anti-bowing technique includes calculating, by the core turning controller, an additional amount of rotor bow that forms in the rotor during a motoring down-time caused by the incomplete anti-rotor bowing operation, and calculates a new motoring time at which to motor the rotor to remove the bow having the additional amount of rotor bow.

8. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 7 , wherein the core turning controller detects a fault in the anti-rotor bowing mode, and invokes a backup rotor turning system to remove the bow having the additional amount of rotor bow.

9. The bowed rotor prevention system of claim 8 , wherein the backup rotor turning system is configured to rotate the rotor at a constant rotation according to the new motoring time to remove the bow having the additional amount of rotor bow.

10. A method of operating a rotor of an aircraft, the method comprising:

rotating a rotor of a gas turbine engine;

rotating a motor shaft using an electric motor, the motor shaft coupled to a drive shaft of the rotor such that rotating the motor shaft rotates the rotor; and

determining, by a core turning controller, whether a rotor bow is present in the rotor based on an operating time of the gas turbine engine;

determining, by the core turning controller, a motoring time based on the operating time; and

invoking, by the core turning controller, an anti-rotor bowing mode configured to control the electric motor to rotate the rotor according to the motor time,

wherein in response to invoking the anti-rotor bowing mode, the core turning controller is configured to perform one of a first anti-bowing technique to prevent the rotor bow from forming in the rotor, or a second anti-bowing technique that removes the rotor bow present in the rotor, and wherein the core turning controller performs the second anti-bowing technique in response to a deactivation of the core turning motor before the motoring time expires, the second anti-bowing technique comprising:

calculating, by the core turning controller, an additional amount of rotor bow that forms in the rotor during a motoring down-time caused by the incomplete anti-rotor bowing operation; and

calculating, by the core turning controller, a new motoring time at which to motor the rotor to remove the bow having the additional amount of rotor bow.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first anti-bowing technique further comprises:

determining, by the core turning controller, a most recent operating time of the gas turbine engine; and

calculating, by the core turning controller, the motoring time which is indicative of an amount of time during which the rotor is rotated to prevent the rotor bow from forming.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first anti-bowing technique further comprises:

dividing, by the core turning controller, a full rotation of the rotor into a number of equal steps; and

controlling the motor such that it rotates the rotor through an alternating series of rotations and pauses over the full rotation.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising monitoring, by a time clock unit, the motoring time and to output a timing signal indicative of the motoring time.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising deactivating the electric motor in response to the timing signal indicating that the motoring time is expired.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising initiating engine startup of the gas turbine engine in response to determining the motoring time is expired.

16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

detecting, by the core turning controller, a fault in the anti-rotor bowing mode; invoking a backup rotor turning system; and

rotating, by the backup rotor turning system, the rotor at a constant rotation according to the new motoring time to remove the bow having the additional amount of rotor bow.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 21, 2025
From: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
To: RTX CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070589/0241 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 10, 2024
From: SCHAFER, BRADLEY C.; WINEBRENNER, BRIAN V.; SOLOMONIDES, JASON B.; MULDOON, MARC J.; VIRTUE, JOHN P., JR.
To: RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067369/0602 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 18299423 · Apr 12, 2023
Related Publication 20240344466A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (19)
US 10443543B2 · Virtue, Jr. et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10473034B2 · Harder et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10502139B2 · Ross et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10598047B2 · Clauson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10781754B2 · Chiasson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10801371B2 · Clauson et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11486310B2 · Tomescu · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20090037121A1 · Muralidharan et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20170234231A1 · Virtue, Jr. et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170363012A1 · Clauson et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180340475A1 · Grigorov et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180355764A1 · Clauson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190178165A1 · Chiasson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190186368A1 · Sharma et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200271011A1 · Comandore et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220154595A1 · Knecht et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220235707A1 · Millhaem et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 3415729A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 24170101.0; Application Filing Date Apr. 12, 2024; Date of Mailing Aug. 27, 2024 (11 pages). [cited by applicant]