IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,279,918
Granted Patent B2
US 12,279,918 · App. 18/661,296 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Surgical tray efficiency system and related methods

Inventor: Jeffrey Gerstner (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Flex Operating Room, LLC
A61B90/37A61B46/10A61B50/13A61B50/15A61B50/20A61B50/22A61B50/33A61B50/34B25J9/1679B25J15/0491F16M11/22F16M11/42F16M13/027A61B2050/155A61B90/94A61B90/98Y10S901/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,279,918
App. No.
18/661,296
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A surgical tray efficiency system comprising a vertical rack assembly for holding and displaying a plurality of surgical instrument trays, a sterile barrier covering the vertical rack assembly and including tray location identifiers, and a standardization software platform including a customizable interactive planogram is described. The customizable interactive planogram software helps operating room staff arrange the instrument trays on the vertical rack assembly according to a predetermined customizable location ID, and create/load/access information related to the surgical procedure/trays/instruments before, during, and after the surgery.

Claims (114)

1. A computer-implemented method for increasing efficiency during surgical procedures, comprising:

presenting, by a computing system, a user interface that presents multiple interface elements that correspond to multiple respective stages of a particular surgical procedure, with the multiple interface elements including:

(i) a first stage interface element that corresponds to a first stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

(ii) a second stage interface element that corresponds to second stage of the particular surgical procedure;

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the first stage interface element that corresponds to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure;

presenting, by the computing system responsive to having received the user input that selects the first stage interface element, a first stage screen that visually identifies each surgical instrument in a first collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure;

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the second stage interface element that corresponds to the second stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

presenting, by the computing system responsive to having received the user input that selects the second stage interface element, a second stage screen that visually identifies each surgical instrument in a second collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the second stage of the particular surgical procedure.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies a quantity of the multiple interface elements that correspond to the multiple respective stages of the particular surgical procedure, such that a quantity of the stages of the particular surgical procedure is user defined.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

presenting, by the computing system, an interface element that is user selectable to add, to the user interface, a third stage interface element that corresponds to a third stage of the particular surgical procedure.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first stage interface element is populated with indications of the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage interface element is populated with indications of the second collection of surgical instruments.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the user interface presents the first stage interface element concurrent with the second stage interface element.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first stage screen includes a first notes field that presents a first user-specified note that pertains to the first stage of the surgical procedure; and

the second stage screen includes a second notes field that presents a second user-specified note that pertains to the second stage of the surgical procedure.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the user interface presents a name for the first stage of the particular surgical procedure in association with the first stage interface element; and

the user interface presents a name for the second stage of the particular surgical procedure in association with the second stage interface element.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , comprising:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies the name for the first stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies the name for the second stage of the particular surgical procedure.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the first collection of surgical elements by listing names of the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the second collection of surgical elements by listing names of the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein:

the first stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the first collection of surgical elements by visually depicting the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments, in addition to listing the names of the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the second collection of surgical elements by visually depicting the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments, in addition to listing the names of the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the first collection of surgical instruments for presentation by the first stage screen, from among a larger collection of surgical instruments that are arranged on a plurality of surgical instrument trays; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the second collection of surgical instruments for presentation by the second stage screen, from among the larger collection of surgical instruments that are arranged on the plurality of surgical instrument trays.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein:

a quantity of surgical instruments that form the first collection of surgical instruments is different from a quantity of surgical instruments that form the second collection of surgical instruments.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , comprising:

presenting, by the computing system, a second user interface that depicts a representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays that store the larger collection of surgical instruments,

wherein the representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays includes a plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements that each represent a surgical instrument tray of the plurality of surgical instrument trays, and

wherein the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements are arranged in the second user interface according to a planned arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the second user interface concurrently presents:

(i) the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements that are arranged according to the planed arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure; and

(ii) an interface element adapted to navigate from (a) the second user interface that presents the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements, to (b) the user interface that presents the multiple interface elements that correspond to the multiple respective stages of the particular surgical procedure.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , comprising:

presenting, by the computing system, a third user interface that includes a set of interface elements that correspond to multiple different surgical procedures, including a particular interface element that corresponds to the particular surgical procedure; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the particular interface element to navigate to the second user interface that depicts the representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays, including the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements arranged according to the planned arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that interacts with the first stage screen to select a selected surgical instrument from the first collection of surgical instruments; and

presenting, by the computing system responsive to receiving the user input that interacts with the first stage screen to select the selected surgical instrument, an instrument view window that lists a name for the selected surgical instrument and visually depicts the selected surgical instrument.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein computing system presents the instrument view window over a portion of the first stage screen.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein:

the visual depiction of the selected surgical instrument in the instrument view window is larger than a visual depiction of the selected surgical instrument in the first stage screen.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein:

the first stage screen identifies a surgical instrument tray at which the selected surgical instrument is stored from among a plurality of surgical instrument trays that store a larger collection of surgical instruments;

the larger collection of surgical instruments are arranged on a plurality of surgical instrument trays located at a plurality of tray-receiving areas of a shelf assembly; and

the plurality of tray-receiving areas of the shelf assembly are different from a staging area configured to receive the first collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein the staging area comprises a mayo stand.

21. A computing system, comprising one or more processors and computer-readable storage including instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the computing system to perform operations that include:

presenting, by the computing system, a user interface that presents multiple interface elements that correspond to multiple respective stages of a particular surgical procedure, with the multiple interface elements including:

(i) a first stage interface element that corresponds to a first stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

(ii) a second stage interface element that corresponds to second stage of the particular surgical procedure;

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the first stage interface element that corresponds to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure;

presenting, by the computing system responsive to having received the user input that selects the first stage interface element, a first stage screen that visually identifies each surgical instrument in a first collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure;

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the second stage interface element that corresponds to the second stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

presenting, by the computing system responsive to having received the user input that selects the second stage interface element, a second stage screen that visually identifies each surgical instrument in a second collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the second stage of the particular surgical procedure.

22. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein:

the user interface presents a name for the first stage of the particular surgical procedure in association with the first stage interface element; and

the user interface presents a name for the second stage of the particular surgical procedure in association with the second stage interface element.

23. The computing system of claim 22 , wherein the operations include:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies the name for the first stage of the particular surgical procedure; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies the name for the second stage of the particular surgical procedure.

24. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein the operations include:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that specifies a quantity of the multiple interface elements that correspond to the multiple respective stages of the particular surgical procedure, such that a quantity of the stages of the particular surgical procedure is user defined.

25. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein the operations include:

presenting, by the computing system, an interface element that is user selectable to add, to the user interface, a third stage interface element that corresponds to a third stage of the particular surgical procedure.

26. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein:

the first stage interface element is populated with indications of the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage interface element is populated with indications of the second collection of surgical instruments.

27. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein the user interface presents the first stage interface element concurrent with the second stage interface element.

28. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein:

the first stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the first collection of surgical elements by listing names of the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the second collection of surgical elements by listing names of the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments.

29. The computing system of claim 28 , wherein:

the first stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the first collection of surgical elements by visually depicting the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments, in addition to listing the names of the surgical instruments in the first collection of surgical instruments; and

the second stage screen visually identifies each surgical instrument in the second collection of surgical elements by visually depicting the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments, in addition to listing the names of the surgical instruments in the second collection of surgical instruments.

30. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein the operations include:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the first collection of surgical instruments for presentation by the first stage screen, from among a larger collection of surgical instruments that are arranged on a plurality of surgical instrument trays; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the second collection of surgical instruments for presentation by the second stage screen, from among the larger collection of surgical instruments that are arranged on the plurality of surgical instrument trays.

31. The computing system of claim 30 , wherein:

a quantity of surgical instruments that form the first collection of surgical instruments is different from a quantity of surgical instruments that form the second collection of surgical instruments.

32. The computing system of claim 30 , wherein:

the operations include presenting, by the computing system, a second user interface that depicts a representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays that store the larger collection of surgical instruments;

the representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays includes a plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements that each represent a surgical instrument tray of the plurality of surgical instrument trays; and

the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements are arranged in the second user interface according to a planned arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure.

33. The computing system of claim 32 , wherein the second user interface concurrently presents:

(i) the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements that are arranged according to the planed arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure; and

(ii) an interface element adapted to navigate from (a) the second user interface that presents the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements, to (b) the user interface that presents the multiple interface elements that correspond to the multiple respective stages of the particular surgical procedure.

34. The computing system of claim 32 , wherein the operations include:

presenting, by the computing system, a third user interface that includes a set of interface elements that correspond to multiple different surgical procedures, including a particular interface element that corresponds to the particular surgical procedure; and

receiving, by the computing system, user input that selects the particular interface element to navigate to the second user interface that depicts the representation of the plurality of surgical instrument trays, including the plurality of tray-identifying graphical elements arranged according to the planned arrangement of the plurality of surgical instrument trays for the particular surgical procedure.

35. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein the operations include:

receiving, by the computing system, user input that interacts with the first stage screen to select a selected surgical instrument from the first collection of surgical instruments; and

presenting, by the computing system responsive to receiving the user input that interacts with the first stage screen to select the selected surgical instrument, an instrument view window that lists a name for the selected surgical instrument and visually depicts the selected surgical instrument.

36. The computing system of claim 35 , wherein computing system presents the instrument view window over a portion of the first stage screen.

37. The computing system of claim 35 , wherein:

the visual depiction of the selected surgical instrument in the instrument view window is larger than a visual depiction of the selected surgical instrument in the first stage screen.

38. The computing system of claim 35 , wherein:

the first stage screen identifies a surgical instrument tray at which the selected surgical instrument is stored from among a plurality of surgical instrument trays that store a larger collection of surgical instruments;

the larger collection of surgical instruments are arranged on a plurality of surgical instrument trays located at a plurality of tray-receiving areas of a shelf assembly; and

the plurality of tray-receiving areas of the shelf assembly are different from a staging area configured to receive the first collection of surgical instruments that are assigned to the first stage of the particular surgical procedure.

39. The computing system of claim 38 , wherein the staging area comprises a mayo stand.

40. The computing system of claim 21 , wherein:

the first stage screen includes a first notes field that presents a first user-specified note that pertains to the first stage of the surgical procedure; and

the second stage screen includes a second notes field that presents a second user-specified note that pertains to the second stage of the surgical procedure.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2024
From: GERSTNER, JEFFREY
To: FLEX OPERATING ROOM, LLC
Reel/Frame 067385/0684 →
MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 13, 2024
From: FLEX OPERATING ROOM, LLC; FLEX OPERATING ROOM, INC.
To: FLEX OPERATING ROOM, INC.
Reel/Frame 067385/0714 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17867199 · Jul 18, 2022
Continuation 16782699 · Feb 5, 2020
Continuation 16397853 · Apr 29, 2019
Continuation 15478219 · Apr 3, 2017
Continuation In Part 15055280 · Feb 26, 2016
Provisional Application 62317544 · Apr 2, 2016
Provisional Application 62121710 · Feb 27, 2015
Related Publication 20240299114A1 · Sep 12, 2024
References Cited (77)
US 338011A · Adams, Jr. · 1886 [cited by applicant]
US 538145A · Allen · 1895 [cited by applicant]
US 725625A · Lurye et al. · 1903 [cited by applicant]
US 907171A · Poles et al. · 1908 [cited by applicant]
US 1104004A · Rathbone · 1914 [cited by applicant]
US 1204286A · Lengquist · 1916 [cited by applicant]
US 1531540A · Calero · 1925 [cited by applicant]
US 1715163A · Kim · 1929 [cited by applicant]
US 2002128A · Reidenbaugh · 1935 [cited by applicant]
US 2148548A · Gregory · 1939 [cited by applicant]
US 2530231A · Detweiler · 1950 [cited by applicant]
US 2707841A · Figura · 1955 [cited by applicant]
US 3294266A · Snow · 1966 [cited by applicant]
US 4109892A · Hartung · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4113218A · Linder · 1978 [cited by applicant]
US 4927214A · Kaufman et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5096072A · Link · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5170804A · Glassman · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5289957A · Huang · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5310066A · Konstant · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5454722A · Holland et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5590796A · Herman · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5610811A · Honda · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5927214A · Schwartz et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5991728A · DeBusk et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6019102A · Becker · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6039228A · Stein · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6105797A · Haisma · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6158437A · Vagley · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6189459B1 · DeAngelis · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6224072B1 · Weck · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6267345B1 · Turner · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6382434B1 · Silberg · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6497233B1 · DeAngelis · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6823805B2 · Becker · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7249680B2 · Wang · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7624954B2 · Randle, Jr. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7731136B1 · Chisolm · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7748802B2 · Peruzzi · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7815202B2 · Richards · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8074815B2 · Gerstner · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8104787B2 · Haley · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8323034B1 · Youngblood · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8371592B2 · Feitel · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8464994B2 · Chiu · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8689704B2 · Hodges et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8763824B2 · Alcock · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8911677B2 · Gerstner et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8950344B2 · Lewis et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10271917B2 · Gerstner · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10575915B2 · Gerstner et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20020023889A1 · Larbaletier · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040194673A1 · Comeaux · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050229937A1 · Salvaggio · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050275178A1 · Huesdash · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060260515A1 · Hodges · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080073304A1 · Corbett · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080149001A1 · Hodges · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090045154A1 · Gerstner · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090267772A1 · Dehnadi · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110247634A1 · Young et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120042808A1 · Allen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120137935A1 · Hodges · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120248047A1 · Tanabe · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130328661A1 · Phillips et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140041669A1 · Houde · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140216305A1 · Hodges et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150018622A1 · Tesar · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150020813A1 · Kannan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160249996A1 · Gerstner · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170202630A1 · Gerstner et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170312035A1 · May · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190254767A1 · Gerstner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2003081379 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
AU Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 2017240831, dated Jun. 4, 2021, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2017/025804, dated Jul. 5, 2017, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Australian Appln. No. 2017240831, dated Jan. 17, 2022, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]