IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,737,707
Granted Patent B2
US 12,737,707 · App. 18/672,552 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Method for a plant operation optimization component

Inventors: Georg Gutermuth (Heidelberg, DE); Bernhard Primas (Mannheim, DE); Matthias Biskoping (Hirschberg, DE); Matthias Schloeder (Heidelberg, DE); Arzam Muzaffar Kotriwala (Ladenburg, DE)
Assignee: ABB Schweiz AG
G06Q10/0633G06Q50/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,737,707
App. No.
18/672,552
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method for a plant operation optimization component includes determining optimal operation set points and, based on optimal operation set points and corresponding operational costs, providing output allowing for selecting a tariff.

Claims (24)

1 . A method for a plant operation optimization component, the method comprising:

determining optimal operation set points and corresponding operational costs associated with the current tariff based on a current tariff and a technical plant configuration, wherein the technical plant configuration comprises plant component characteristics including the presence of an energy storage device and load characteristics;

receiving a candidate tariff that is different from the current tariff;

modifying the candidate tariff to obtain a modified candidate tariff by changing a value of a variable of a plurality of variables characterizing the candidate tariff and determining optimal operation set points and corresponding operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff based on the modified candidate tariff and the technical plant configuration, wherein the modifying of the candidate tariff comprises carrying out an optimization problem finding a value for the variable of the plurality of variables characterizing the candidate tariff for which value the operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff meet a target criterion while minimizing cost associated with another variable of the plurality of variables characterizing the candidate tariff;

determining whether the operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff meet the target criterion;

when determining that the target criterion is not met, repeating the modifying of the candidate tariff until the target criterion is met;

when determining that the target criterion is met, providing an output allowing for selecting a new current tariff and for determining corresponding operation set points,

wherein the modified candidate tariff for which the target criterion is met is a final modified candidate tariff,

wherein the output comprises at least one of: the final modified candidate tariff, the value of the variable associated with the final modified candidate tariff, one or more tariff selection criteria determined based on the final modified candidate tariff and/or the value of the variable associated with the final modified candidate tariff, and wherein an operation of the energy storage device is adjusted to shift energy consumption according to the final modified candidate tariff, and

wherein the target criterion is that the operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff equal the operational costs associated with the current tariff, or that the operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff are within a predetermined range relative to the operational costs associated with the current tariff the range comprising the costs associated with the current tariff and values smaller than the costs associated with the current tariff or the range comprising only values smaller than the costs associated with the current tariff, or that the operational costs associated with the modified candidate tariff are lower than the operational costs associated with the current tariff by a predetermined amount.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method further comprises:

determining optimal operation set points and corresponding operational costs associated with the candidate tariff based on the candidate tariff and the technical plant configuration,

wherein the method only directly proceeds with the modifying of the candidate tariff when it is determined that the operational costs associated with the candidate tariff are lower than the operational costs associated with the current tariff by a predetermined amount, and otherwise proceeds with the modifying of the candidate tariff only upon confirmation by a user and/or proceeds with the modifying of a different candidate tariff and/or terminates.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying is carried out for exactly one of the plurality of variables while keeping the value of the remaining variables of the plurality of variables fixed.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein modifying is carried out for two or more of the plurality of variables while keeping the value of the remaining variables of the plurality of variables fixed, wherein the same target criterion or different target criteria are used for the two or more of the plurality of variables.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more tariff selection criteria comprises a threshold value, the threshold value corresponding to or being determined based on the value of the variable associated with the final modified candidate tariff.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold value signifies a breakeven value for the variable associated with the final modified candidate tariff.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein variables characterizing a tariff comprise at least one of: a flat energy price, a peak energy price, a peak power price, a mean energy price.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the technical plant configuration further comprises presence of hydrogen storage or characteristics of hydrogen storage.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of optimal operation set points is carried out for time-series data for a selected time interval, and/or for a selected demand curve, and/or historic data.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining of the optimal operation set points is carried out for the current tariff, the modified candidate tariff, and the modified candidate tariff is carried out for the same conditions and time interval.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the current tariff and the candidate tariff are of different tariff types and/or wherein the candidate tariff and the modified candidate tariff are of the same tariff type, wherein the tariff type may be fixed energy price or variable energy price.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the current tariff is a variable energy price type tariff, and the candidate tariff is a fixed energy price type tariff having a fixed energy price corresponding to the mean energy price of the current tariff.

13 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises receiving a proposed new tariff, determining whether the proposed new tariff meets the selection criteria, and approving selection of the proposed new tariff as current tariff when this is the case and otherwise disapproving selection of the proposed new tariff.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2024
From: GUTERMUTH, GEORG; PRIMAS, BERNHARD; BISKOPING, MATTHIAS; SCHLOEDER, MATTHIAS; KOTRIWALA, ARZAM MUZAFFAR
To: ABB SCHWEIZ AG
Reel/Frame 068453/0831 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 23175810 · May 26, 2023 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240394633A1 · Nov 28, 2024
References Cited (26)
US 5924486A · Ehlers · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 8359124B2 · Zhou · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 9626634B2 · Schroeder · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9634488B2 · Sundaram · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10580094B1 · Haynold · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20020019758A1 · Scarpelli · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20040068454A1 · Jacobus · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20080243310A1 · Esposito · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20100198423A1 · Hirst · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110106328A1 · Zhou · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120303412A1 · Etzioni · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130060394A1 · Jones · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130144451A1 · Kumar · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140031999A1 · Oe · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140324532A1 · Ghosh · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20160291554A1 · Hong · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200193346A1 · Elbsat · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230418346A1 · Matthews · 2023 [cited by examiner]
EP 0688085A1 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
Jeon, Hyun Woo, Seokgi Lee, and Chao Wang. “Estimating manufacturing electricity costs by simulating dependence between production parameters.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 55 (2019): 129-140. (Year: 2… [cited by examiner]
Beier, Jan, Sebastian Thiede, and Christoph Herrmann. “Integrating variable renewable electricity supply into manufacturing systems.” Eco-factories of the future. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. 17-40. (Y… [cited by examiner]
Holtewert, Philipp, and Thomas Bauernhansl. “Optimal configuration of manufacturing cells for high flexibility and cost reduction by component substitution.” Procedia CIRP 41 (2016): 111-116. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Mitra, Sumit, et al. “Optimal production planning under time-sensitive electricity prices for continuous power-intensive processes.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 38 (2012): 171-184. (Year: 2012). [cited by examiner]
Shrouf, Fadi, et al. “Optimizing the production scheduling of a single machine to minimize total energy consumption costs.” Journal of Cleaner Production 67 (2014): 197-207. (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Cano et al., “Impact of Different Tariffs on the Optimal Sizing and Operation of a Household with PV, Storage and Electric Vehicle,” [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report in European Patent Application No. 23175810.3, 7 pp. (Nov. 21, 2023). [cited by applicant]