IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,493,285
Granted Patent B2
US 12,493,285 · App. 18/674,537 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Determining a correction to a process

Inventors: Sarathi Roy (Eindhoven, NL); Edo Maria Hulsebos (Waalre, NL); Roy Werkman (Eindhoven, NL); Junru Ruan (Beaverton, OR)
Assignee: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
G05B19/41875G03F7/70508G03F7/70525G05B13/027G05B19/41885G06N3/044G05B2219/33025G05B2219/45028G05B2219/45031
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,493,285
App. No.
18/674,537
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for configuring a semiconductor manufacturing process, the method including: obtaining a first value of a first parameter based on measurements associated with a first operation of a process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process and a first sampling scheme; using a recurrent neural network to determine a predicted value of the first parameter based on the first value; and using the predicted value of the first parameter in configuring a subsequent operation of the process step in the semiconductor manufacturing process.

Claims (52)

1 . A method comprising:

obtaining first sparse data representing measured values of a parameter across one or more substrates subject to a process and measured using a sparse sampling layout;

obtaining dense data representing measured values of the parameter across one or more substrates subject to the process and measured using a dense sampling layout that is more spatially dense than the sparse sampling layout;

applying a model to the sparse data and dense data to determine a sparse-to-dense mismatch;

adapting the model based on the sparse-to-dense mismatch;

obtaining second sparse data representing measured values of the parameter across one or more substrates subject to the process and measured using a sparse sampling layout;

applying the adapted model to the second sparse data to determine a sparse model result; and

determining a correction to the process based on the sparse model result.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the adapting the model based on the sparse-to-dense mismatch comprises:

evaluating different contributions of respective parts of the model to the sparse-to-dense mismatch;

determining weighting factors for weighting the respective parts of the model to reduce the sparse-to-dense mismatch; and

adapting the model with the weighting factors.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the determining weighting factors comprises determining weighting factors for weighting the respective parts of the model to minimize the sparse-to-dense mismatch.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining the sparse-to-dense mismatch comprises training a matrix on the first sparse data and the dense data, and further comprising modifying the second sparse data using the matrix.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining second sparse data comprises obtaining second sparse data by downsampling second dense data representing measured values of the parameter across a plurality of substrates subject to the process, the dense data measured using different sparse sampling layouts distributed over the plurality of substrates.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the sparse model result comprises sparse model residuals, the method further comprises applying the model to the sparse model residuals to determine a dense model result, and the determining a correction to the process is further based on the dense model result.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sparse model result comprises sparse model residuals, the method further comprises applying the model to the sparse model residuals to determine a dense model result, and the determining a correction to the process is further based on the dense model result.

8 . A semiconductor manufacturing process comprising:

manufacturing a semiconductor; and

performing the method according to claim 1 .

9 . A lithographic apparatus comprising:

a support structure configured to support a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern a beam of radiation according to a desired pattern;

a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;

a projection system configured the project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; and

a processing unit configured to perform the method of claim 1 .

10 . A lithographic cell comprising the lithographic apparatus of claim 9 .

11 . A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions therein, the instructions, upon execution by a computer system, configured to cause the computer system to at least:

obtain first sparse data representing measured values of a parameter across one or more substrates subject to a process and measured using a sparse sampling layout;

obtain dense data representing measured values of the parameter across one or more substrates subject to the process and measured using a dense sampling layout that is more spatially dense than the sparse sampling layout;

apply a model to the sparse data and dense data to determine a sparse-to-dense mismatch;

adapt the model based on the sparse-to-dense mismatch;

obtain second sparse data representing measured values of the parameter across one or more substrates subject to the process and measured using a sparse sampling layout;

apply the adapted model to the second sparse data to determine a sparse model result; and

determine a correction to the process based on the sparse model result.

12 . The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to adapt the model are further configured to cause the computer system to:

evaluate different contributions of respective parts of the model to the sparse-to-dense mismatch;

determine weighting factors for weighting the respective parts of the model to reduce the sparse-to-dense mismatch; and

adapt the model with the weighting factors.

13 . The computer program product of claim 12 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to determine the weight factors are further configured to cause the computer system to determine weighting factors for weighting the respective parts of the model to minimize the sparse-to-dense mismatch.

14 . The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to:

train a matrix on the first sparse data and the dense data, and

modify the second sparse data using the matrix.

15 . The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the computer system to obtain second sparse data are further configured to cause the computer system to obtain second sparse data by downsampling second dense data representing measured values of the parameter across a plurality of substrates subject to the process, the dense data measured using different sparse sampling layouts distributed over the plurality of substrates.

16 . The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the sparse model result comprises sparse model residuals and wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to apply the model to the sparse model residuals to determine a dense model result, and further determine the correction to the process based on the dense model result.

17 . The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the sparse model result comprises sparse model residuals and wherein the instructions are further configured to cause the computer system to apply the model to the sparse model residuals to determine a dense model result, and further determine the correction to the process based on the dense model result.

18 . The computer program product of claim 11 , wherein the parameter comprises overlay.

19 . A lithographic apparatus comprising:

a support structure configured to support a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern a beam of radiation according to a desired pattern;

a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;

a projection system configured the project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate; and

the computer program product of claim 11 .

20 . A lithographic cell comprising the lithographic apparatus of claim 19 .

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: ROY, SARATHI; HULSEBOS, EDO MARIA; WERKMAN, ROY
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 072213/0756 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: RUAN, JUNRU
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 072213/0816 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: ROY, SARATHI
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 072213/0844 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: ROY, SARATHI
To: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 072213/0879 →
Priority Claims (4)
EP 18204882 · Nov 7, 2018 · regional
EP 19150953 · Jan 9, 2019 · regional
EP 19173992 · May 13, 2019 · regional
EP 19199505 · Sep 25, 2019 · regional
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17367901 · Jul 6, 2021
Continuation 17174159 · Feb 11, 2021
Continuation PCTEP2019077353 · Oct 9, 2019
Related Publication 20240345569A1 · Oct 17, 2024
References Cited (57)
US 6952253B2 · Lof et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 11494636B2 · Jung et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030054642A1 · Kagotani et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030223055A1 · Agarwal et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040207824A1 · Lof et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060078806A1 · Hansen · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060170899A1 · De Kruif et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090063378A1 · Izikson · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100049680A1 · Huang et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110199596A1 · Middlebrooks · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120208301A1 · Izikson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160246185A1 · Ypma · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160299438A1 · Mos · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170017162A1 · Chang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170177997A1 · Karlinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170193680A1 · Zhang · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170200265A1 · Bhaskar et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170357895A1 · Karlinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364798A1 · Karlinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180012180A1 · Jones et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180067900A1 · Mos et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190257767A1 · Shaubi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392363A1 · Kohli · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200005139A1 · Cherian · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200104639A1 · Didari et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200294224A1 · Shaubi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 101794325 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
EP 3279735 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2002134395 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006013013 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006114901 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006179937 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2009032183 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011233744 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017536584 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019075555 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019102495 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020180061769 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 20190041908 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
TW 201037455 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
TW 201837617 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013092106 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015049087 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020234863 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Application No. PCT/EP2019/077353, dated Jan. 29, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Taiwanese Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 109128463, dated Nov. 4, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Lin, T, et al.: “A novel key-variable sifting algorithm for virtual metrology”, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA (May 2008). [cited by applicant]
Su, Y. et al.: “Implementation Considerations of Various Virtual Metrology Algorithms”, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, Scottsdale, AZ, pp. 276-281 (2007). [cited by applicant]
Wang, J. et al. “Bilateral LSTM: A Two-Dimensional Long Short-Term Memory Model With Multiply Memory Units for Short-Term Cycle Time Forecasting in Re-entrant Manufacturing Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Info… [cited by applicant]
Levin, T. et al.: “Automated process control optimization to control low volume products based on high volume products data”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5755 (May 17, 2005). [cited by applicant]
Yahiro, T. et al.: “Feed-forward alignment correction for advanced overlay process control using a standalone alignment station ‘Litho Booster’”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 10585 (Mar. 13, 2018). [cited by applicant]
Yu et al. “Using EWMA control schemes for monitoring wafer quality in negative binomial process,” Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 51, pp. 400-405 (2011). [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Taiwanese Patent Application No. 111134065, dated Apr. 7, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Korean Patent Application No. 10-2021-7013677, dated Jan. 12, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Japanese Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application 2021-524168, dated Oct. 25, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2023-077714, dated Apr. 2, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2023-7029798, dated Apr. 29, 2024. [cited by applicant]