IP Library Granted Patent US 12,415,008
Granted Patent B2
US 12,415,008 · App. 18/678,858 · Granted Sep 16, 2025

Sanitation monitoring system using pathogen surrogates and surrogate tracking

Inventors: Antonios Zografos (Pleasanton, CA); Laurie M. Clotilde (Oakland, CA); Peter Mattei (Lemon Grove, CA)
Assignee: SafeTraces, Inc.
A61L2/28G06T11/60G06T19/006A61L2202/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,415,008
App. No.
18/678,858
Granted
Sep 16, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sanitation management system maintains records of exemplary locations on an item to be sanitized and indicates those locations to a person or system charged with applying a pathogen surrogate prior to a sanitation process. The sanitation management system maintains records of where the pathogen surrogate was applied prior to the sanitation process. Following the sanitation process, the sanitation management system indicates to an inspector, or an inspection system, locations of where the pathogen surrogate was applied for the purpose of facilitating testing of the sanitation process by checking for the presence of the pathogen surrogate at some or all of those locations. This can ensure that the inspection process is relevant to the sanitation process and less likely to generate false negatives where the inspection finds a lack of the pathogen surrogate not due to cleaning, but due to lack of application of the pathogen surrogate.

Claims (34)

1. A sanitation management system comprising:

a computer capable of maintaining records of exemplary locations on an item to be sanitized and records of where a pathogen surrogate was applied prior to a sanitation process, the pathogen surrogate comprising a carrier that mimics biological behavior of pathogens that create biofilms;

an augmented reality display that can display marks corresponding to the exemplary locations undergoing sanitation;

an interface to gather information about how the pathogen surrogate was applied to the exemplary locations; and

an inspection interface to provide sampling locations at which to check for presence of the pathogen surrogate at some or all of the exemplary locations.

2. The sanitation management system of claim 1 , wherein the pathogen surrogate comprises non-coding DNA sequences that form tags or tag sequences.

3. The sanitation management system of claim 2 , wherein the pathogen surrogate comprises tags, or tag sequences, and the carrier.

4. The sanitation management system of claim 3 , wherein the carrier comprises one or more of water, alcohol, wax, oil, or other base.

5. The sanitation management system of claim 4 , wherein the carrier comprises a carrier biofilm and the carrier biofilm has characteristics selected to mimic biological behavior of microorganisms that create natural biofilms.

6. The sanitation management system of claim 1 , wherein the pathogen surrogate comprises a tag bound to the carrier, wherein the tag comprises a DNA sequence corresponding to an N-bit tag value, and wherein the carrier is non-toxic.

7. The sanitation management system of claim 1 , wherein the pathogen surrogate comprises a plurality of tags wherein each tag of the plurality of tags comprises a DNA sequence bound to an instance of the carrier with the DNA sequence representing tag value, wherein the plurality of tags represent a plurality of tag values and wherein the tags of the plurality of tags are unbound to each other.

8. The sanitation management system of claim 1 , wherein the carrier is a PLGA-based carrier comprising a biodegradable copolymer of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) having a determined PLGA hydrolysis rate dependent on a ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid used, whereby a degradation rate of the pathogen surrogate is aligned with a target pathogen.

9. The sanitation management system of claim 1 , wherein the records of where the pathogen surrogate was applied comprises records for a plurality of pathogen surrogates that are applied, the plurality of pathogen surrogates comprising at least a first pathogen surrogate comprising a first carrier and a second pathogen surrogate comprising a second carrier, wherein the first carrier has a first level of resilience to the sanitation process and the second carrier has a second level of resilience to the sanitation process, whereby a low resilience carrier is more easily removed during the sanitation process as compared to a high resilience carrier, to provide an indication of a degree of sanitation.

10. The sanitation management system of claim 9 , wherein each pathogen surrogate of the plurality of pathogen surrogates is applied with an associated degree of resilience, and the sanitation management system further comprises a sampler for reading relative concentrations of the plurality of pathogen surrogates following the sanitation process.

11. The sanitation management system of claim 10 , wherein each pathogen surrogate further comprises a plurality of tags, each bound to a particular carrier characterized by a degree of resilience, whereby the degree of sanitation is determined based on which of the plurality of tags are found in that the sampling locations.

12. A method of performing sanitation of an item to be sanitized, the method comprising:

reading, into a computer system capable of providing a display, records of exemplary locations on the item to be sanitized;

obtaining a pathogen surrogate comprising a carrier that mimics biological behavior of pathogens that create biofilms;

displaying, to a person or a system charged with applying the pathogen surrogate prior to a sanitation process, indicia corresponding to the exemplary locations undergoing the sanitation process;

applying the pathogen surrogate to application locations of the exemplary locations;

recording information about how the pathogen surrogate was applied to the application locations; and

following a sanitation process sanitizing the item, sampling selected locations of the application locations to check for presence of the pathogen surrogate at some or all of the selected locations.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein displaying the indicia comprises displaying the indicia on an augmented reality display used by the person charged with applying the pathogen surrogate.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein recording information about how the pathogen surrogate was applied to the application locations comprises:

following a prompt to the person charged with applying the pathogen surrogate, using a camera, determining that the person applied the pathogen surrogate; and

determining that where the person applied the pathogen corresponds to a prompted location.

15. The method of claim 12 , wherein the pathogen surrogate comprises a plurality of tags wherein each tag of the plurality of tags comprises a DNA sequence bound to an instance of the carrier with the DNA sequence representing tag value, wherein the plurality of tags represents a plurality of tag values and wherein the tags of the plurality of tags are unbound to each other.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the carrier comprises a carrier biofilm and the carrier biofilm has characteristics selected to mimic biological behavior of microorganisms that create natural biofilms.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein the carrier is a PLGA-based carrier comprising a biodegradable copolymer of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) having a determined PLGA hydrolysis rate dependent on a ratio of lactic acid to glycolic acid used, whereby a degradation rate of the pathogen surrogate is aligned with a target pathogen.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein recording information about how the pathogen surrogate was applied to the application locations comprises recording records for a plurality of pathogen surrogates that are applied, the plurality of pathogen surrogates comprising at least a first pathogen surrogate comprising a first carrier and a second pathogen surrogate comprising a second carrier, wherein the first carrier has a first level of resilience to the sanitation process and the second carrier has a second level of resilience to the sanitation process, whereby a low resilience carrier is more easily removed during the sanitation process as compared to a high resilience carrier, to provide an indication of a degree of sanitation.

19. The method of claim 18 , further comprising:

applying each pathogen surrogate of the plurality of pathogen surrogates with an associated degree of resilience; and

following the sanitation process, reading a sampler to determine relative concentrations of the plurality of pathogen surrogates following the sanitation process.

20. The method of claim 12 , wherein each pathogen surrogate further comprises a plurality of tags, each bound to a particular carrier characterized by a degree of resilience, whereby the degree of sanitation is determined based on which of the plurality of tags are found in that the sampling locations.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 30, 2024
From: ZOGRAFOS, ANTONIOS; CLOTILDE, LAURIE M.; MATTEI, PETER
To: SAFETRACES, INC.
Reel/Frame 067570/0978 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17486767 · Sep 27, 2021
Continuation 16741668 · Jan 13, 2020
Continuation 15963017 · Apr 25, 2018
Related Publication 20250018077A1 · Jan 16, 2025
References Cited (101)
US 1913069A · Chance · 1933 [cited by applicant]
US 4593360A · Cocks · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 6312911B1 · Bancroft et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 8293535B2 · Farquar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 10556032B2 · Zografos et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11129915B2 · Zografos et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 12016967B2 · Zografos · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020129523A1 · Hunt · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040166520A1 · Connolly · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050031487A1 · Rosenblatt et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060037222A1 · Hunt et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060111845A1 · Forbis et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090070134A1 · Rodgers · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100159434A1 · Lampotag et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100261193A1 · Webster et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110165569A1 · Macula · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110177539A1 · Sutton et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120112883A1 · Wallace et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130052751A1 · Farquar et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130122807A1 · Tenarvitz et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130183749A1 · Aamodt · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140046722A1 · Rosenbloom et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140057276A1 · Farquar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140108039A1 · Rensvold et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140167917A2 · Wallace et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140220576A1 · Macula · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140255984A1 · Sharpin · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140272097A1 · Jung et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140340423A1 · Taylor et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150034309A1 · Blair · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150205985A1 · Jinadatha · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150314026A1 · Mauzerall et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150322426A1 · Zografos et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150361490A1 · Farquar et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160038083A1 · Ding et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160102335A1 · Franciskovich et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160171179A1 · Donofrio et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160188943A1 · Franz · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160306934A1 · Sperry · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160307459A1 · Chestnut · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170038353A1 · Zografos et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170081707A1 · Dillon et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170197002A1 · Dobrinsky et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170322701A1 · Bowman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170333859A1 · Lind · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180108178A1 · Murugappan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180126021A1 · Valentine · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180252738A1 · Denney · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180369438A1 · Grossman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190029002A1 · Kotzer et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190086296A1 · West · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190087533A1 · O'Hara · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190120727A1 · Harding et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190211324A1 · Zografos et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190241982A1 · Hogan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190318807A1 · O'Hara et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20240261449A1 · Hebrink · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CN 101379188A · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 104024426A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104131008A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
CN 104513863A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004063856A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008137831A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011163296A2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2012037876A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014164958A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015038526A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017049160A2 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019157227A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Andrews, “DNA Spray-On Technology Could Revolutionize Food Traceability”, Food Safety News, http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2014/11/dna-laced-spray-technology-could-revolutionize-food-traceability/#.W1kRNNVKjRY, Nov. 17, … [cited by applicant]
Busta et al., “The Use of Indicators and Surrogate Microorganisms for the Evaluation of Pathogens in Fresh and Fresh-Cut Produce,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2(s1), Jan. 2003, pp. 179-185. [cited by applicant]
Bystrykh, “Generalized DNA Barcode Design Based on Hamming Codes,” PLOS One 7(5):e36852, May 17, 2012, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Danyluk et al., “Process Validation: Selection and Use of Surrogates,” University of Florida Institute of Food and I /rgicultural Sciences, presentation dated Apr. 2014, 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report mailed Jun. 28, 2018, European Patent Application No. 15878244.1, filed May 1, 2015, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 26, 2019, European Patent Application No. 16833458.9, filed Jun. 17, 2016, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report mailed dated Oct. 20, 2020, European Patent Application No. 19738614.7, filed Jan. 10, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Farquar, “DNATrax (DNA Tagged Reagents for Aerosol eXperimenls),” Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, presentation LLNL-PRES-642415, Aug. 2013, retrieved from the internet at http://web.archive.org/ , veb/2016022623… [cited by applicant]
Galimberti et al., “DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability”, Food Research International, vol. 50, 2013, pp. 55-63. [cited by applicant]
Galimberti et al., “DNA barcoding for minor crops and food traceability”, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Advances in Agriculture, vol. 2014, Article ID.831875, 2014, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Harding et al., “Unique DNA-barcoded aerosol test particles for studying aerosol transport,” Aerosol Science and Technology 50(5), Mar. 22, 2016, pp. 429-435. [cited by applicant]
Hou et al., “Rapid bioparticle concentration and detection by combining a discharge driven vortex with surface enhanced Raman scattering,” Biomicrofluids 1.014106, Feb. 16, 2007, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 12, 2015, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/028880, filed May 1, 2015, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Sep. 8, 2016, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/038083, filed Jun. 17, 2016, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, mailed Mar. 15, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/013069, filed Jan. 10, 2019, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 8, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/029002, filed Apr. 24, 2019, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed May 24, 2021, International Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/016065, filed Feb. 1, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kumar et al., “A rapid screening for adulterants in olive oil using DNA barcodes.” Food Chemistry 127.3 (2011): 1335-1341, 2011, pp. 1336-1341. [cited by applicant]
Leier et al., “Cryptography with DNA binary strands.” Biosystems 57 .1, 2000, pp. 13-22. [cited by applicant]
Ma et al., “Development of Thermal Surrogate Microorganisms in Ground Beef for In-Plant Critical Control Point Validation Studies,” Journal of Food Protection, 70(4), Apr. 2007, pp. 952-957. [cited by applicant]
Naaum, “Novel Methods of Species and Product Authenticity and Traceability Testing Using DNA Analysis for Food and Agricultural Applications,” Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Integrative Biology University of Guelp… [cited by applicant]
Niebuhr et al., “Evaluation of non-pathogenic surrogate bacteria as process validation indicators for [cited by applicant]
Ovissipour et al., “DNA-based surrogate indicator for sanitation verification and predict inactivation of [cited by applicant]
Oxford Gene Technology, “DNA Storage and Quality,” Aug. 2011 [retrieved Oct. 30, 2018 hllps://www.ogt.com/resources/literature/403 dna storage_ and_ quality], 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Puddu et al., “Magnetically Recoverable, Thermostable, Hydrophobic DNA/Silica Encapsulates and Their Application as Invisible Oil Tags,” ACS Nano 8(3):2677-2685, Feb. 25, 2014, pp. 2677-2685. [cited by applicant]
Ruther, “Assistive Systems for Quality Assurance by Context-aware User Interfaces in Health Care and Production,” Diss. Universitalsbibliolliek Bieiefeld, 2014, 168 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sharma et al., “Hydrological Tracers Using Nanobiotechnology: Proof of Concept,” Environmental Science and Technology, 46(16):8928-8936, Aug. 21, 2012, pp. 8928-8936. [cited by applicant]
Sinclair et al., “A Criteria for Selection of Surrogates Used to Study the Fate and Control of Pathogens in the Environment,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 78(6), published online Jan. 13, 2012, published in p… [cited by applicant]
Singh et al., “DNA QR coding for data security using DNA sequence.” International Journal of Information Technology 12.2, Jan. 18, 2020, pp. 571-576. [cited by applicant]
Vassou et al., “DNA barcoding for species identification from dried and powdered plant parts: A case study with authentication of the raw drug market samples of Sida cordifolia.” Gene 559.1, 2015, pp. 86-93. [cited by applicant]
Yaari et al., “Theranostic barcoded nanoparticles for personalized cancer medicine.” Nature communications, 7.1 (2016): 13325, 2016, pp. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Yeater et al., “Effectiveness of Sanitzing Products on Controlling Selected Pathogen Surrogates on Retail Deli Slicers,” Journal of Food Protection, 78(4), Apr. 2015, pp. 707-715. [cited by applicant]