IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,195,030
Granted Patent B2
US 12,195,030 · App. 18/691,595 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Method for operating a vehicle in an automated driving operation

Inventors: Steffen Kempe (Ulm, DE); Rihab Laarousi (Gärtringen, DE); Daniela Wolf (Sindelfingen, DE)
Assignee: MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
B60W50/14B60W60/00186B60W60/0053B60W60/0057B60W2420/403B60W2420/408B60W2556/20B60W2556/25
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,195,030
App. No.
18/691,595
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A respective range of environment recording sensors of the vehicle is estimated by evaluating sensor signals of the sensors to check whether the ranges of the sensors respectively is sufficient for automated driving operation. If only one of, or only a predetermined subset of, the sensors do not have a sufficient estimated range, the vehicle continues to be moved in automated driving operation maintaining a speed of the vehicle or reducing it to a predetermined limited extent. A request to take over a driving task is output instantly or after a pre-determined time delay. If all of the sensors or more or different sensors than the predetermined subset do not have a sufficient estimated range, the vehicle continues to be moved with the speed of the vehicle reduced to a predetermined more significant extent, and the request to take over the task of driving the vehicle is instantly output.

Claims (14)

1. A method for operating a vehicle in an automated driving operation, the method comprising:

estimating a respective range of environment recording sensors of the vehicle by evaluating sensor signals of the environment recording sensors;

determining whether the environment recording sensors respectively have a sufficient estimated range for the automated driving operation,

wherein, if it is determined that only one of the environment recording sensors does not have a sufficient estimated range or that only a predetermined subset of the environment recording sensors respectively do not have a sufficient estimated range, the vehicle continues to be moved in the automated driving operation, wherein a speed of the vehicle is kept constant or reduced to a predetermined limited extent, and wherein a request to take over a driving task is output to a vehicle driver instantly or after a predetermined time delay,

wherein, if it is determined that all of the environment recording sensors or more or different environment recording sensors than the predetermined subset respectively do not have a sufficient estimated range, the vehicle continues to be moved in the automated driving operation, wherein the speed of the vehicle is reduced to a predetermined more significant extent, and wherein the request to take over the task of driving the vehicle is instantly output to the vehicle driver, and

wherein the automated driving operation is continued at the original speed, and no request to take over the driving task is output to the vehicle driver if, within the predetermined time delay until the request to take over the driving task is output to the vehicle driver, it is determined that the environment recording sensors respectively have a sufficient estimated range for the automated driving operation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective estimated range is determined as being sufficient if the vehicle can be braked to a standstill within this estimated range with a predetermined delay or if the respective estimated range exceeds a minimum sensor range that is predetermined for a current speed of the vehicle.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the automated driving operation is ended if the vehicle driver does not take over the driving task within a predetermined or predeterminable takeover interval of time following the output of the request.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective range is estimated of those environment recording sensors of the vehicle provided to record an environment of the vehicle in a direction of travel of the vehicle.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective range of environment recording sensors of different types is estimated.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respective range of at least one radar sensor, of at least one lidar sensor, and of at least one camera sensor is estimated.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a plausibility test of the respective estimated range is first performed, and using the respective plausibility tested estimated range, it is checked whether the environment recording sensors respectively have a sufficient estimated range for the automated driving operation.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the estimated range of the respective environment recording sensor is assessed as being implausible if the environment recording sensor does not record an object over a predetermined period of time which, according to its estimated range, it should have recorded.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein if an estimated range of an environment recording sensor is assessed as being implausible, the estimated range of this environment recording sensor is corrected to a smaller value.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: KEMPE, STEFFEN; LAAROUSI, RIHAB; WOLF, DANIELA
To: MERCEDES-BENZ GROUP AG
Reel/Frame 067168/0479 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2021 004 646.3 · Sep 14, 2021 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240262379A1 · Aug 8, 2024
References Cited (23)
US 3760415A · Holmstrom · 1973 [cited by examiner]
US 4931767A · Albrecht et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 11634150B2 · Ono et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11787424B2 · Keller et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20120101704A1 · Wagner · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20190004513A1 · Chiba et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200339151A1 · Batts et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20230373530A1 · Kume · 2023 [cited by examiner]
DE 3735267C3 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
DE 19934670A1 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
DE 102010049091A1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
DE 102014212216A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
DE 102017003741A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018003784A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 102018127059A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
DE 102019130037A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
JP 2020064402A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017022417A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020088857A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Jun. 28, 2024 in related/corresponding KR Application No. 10-2024-7005836. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Aug. 6, 2024 in related/corresponding JP Application No. 2024-516354. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Nov. 11, 2022 in related/corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2022/070559. [cited by applicant]
Office Action created May 20, 2022 in related/corresponding DE Application No. 10 2021 004 646.3. [cited by applicant]