IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,585,526
Granted Patent B2
US 12,585,526 · App. 18/708,620 · Granted Mar 24, 2026

Medical imaging device fault handling

Inventors: Qi Gao (Eindhoven, NL); Meru Adagouda Patil (Bangalore, IN); Soubhik Paul (Bangalore, IN); Nagaraju Bussa (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06F11/0781G06F11/0778
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,585,526
App. No.
18/708,620
Granted
Mar 24, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Proposed are concepts pertaining to aiding fault diagnosis through the consideration of the relevance of different log files to a fault. In particular, embodiments of the invention propose generating predicted relevance scores for different log files, and/or content contained therein. The most relevant log file(s), or parts thereof, may then be prioritized for provision to an engineer, for example.

Claims (92)

1 . A method for diagnosing a fault of a medical imaging device, the method comprising:

determining a relevance of log files to the fault of the medical imaging device, the medical imaging device comprising a plurality of subsystems, and each log file being associated with a respective subsystem of the medical imaging device, the determining a relevance of log files to the fault of the medical imaging device comprising:

obtaining initial problem input data relating to the fault of the medical imaging device;

performing a first natural language processing analysis on the initial problem input data to identify one or more features of the medical imaging device fault;

providing one or more features of the medical imaging device fault to a machine learning algorithm, the machine learning algorithm being trained to predict, for each of the plurality of subsystems of the medical imaging device, a fault probability indicating a likelihood that the fault of the medical imaging device originated from the subsystem;

obtaining a prediction result from the machine learning algorithm, the prediction result comprising a fault probability for each of the plurality of subsystems of the medical imaging device; and

determining, for content of each log file, a relevance score based on the obtained prediction result; and

wherein the method for diagnosing the fault of the medical imaging device further comprises:

generating a prioritized list of the log files based on the determined relevance of the content of a plurality of log files.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the method for diagnosing the fault of the medical imaging device further comprises:

transmitting the log files in the prioritized list over a data communication channel to a remote processing device, and in a priority order defined by the prioritized list, the remote processing device being configured for analysing the transmitted log files and for diagnosing the fault of the medical imaging device based on a result of the analysing.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein obtaining initial problem input data comprises:

receiving, via in input interface, initial problem input data provided by a respondent in response to a request for data.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the request for data comprises a fault analysis questionnaire.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning algorithm is trained using a training algorithm configured to receive an array of training inputs and respective known outputs, wherein a training input comprises one or more features of a fault of a medical imaging device and respective known output comprises, for each of the plurality of subsystems of the medical imaging device, a fault probability indicating a likelihood that the fault of medical imaging device originated from the subsystem.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning algorithm comprises a binary classifier trained to make a decision about the fault of the medical imaging device originating in a software subsystem or a hardware subsystem.

7 . The method of any of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining, for content of each log file, a relevance score comprises:

determining, for content of each log file, system relevance scores indicating a relevance of the log file content to each of the subsystems;

determining, for each subsystem, an error probability indicating a probability that the fault of the medical imaging device relates to the subsystem; and

processing the system relevance scores and error probabilities to obtain, for content of each log file, a relevance score.

8 . The method of claim 7 wherein the processing comprises:

processing the system relevance scores and error probabilities based on the following equation:

R

⁡

(

e

,

m

,

f

)

=

R

comp

(

f

)

⁢

P

comp

(

e

,

m

)

+

∑

i

=

1

n

⁢

R

sub

i

(

f

)

⁢

P

sub

i

(

e

,

m

)

wherein: R(e,m,f) is the relevance score of a log file f for the medical imaging device m with the fault e; R comp (f) indicates how relevant the log file f is for a component related fault; R sub i (f) indicates how relevant the log file f is for a fault in a subsystem; P comp (e,m) is the probability of the fault e being component-related; and P sub i (e,m) is the probability of the fault e being related to a subsystem.

9 . A method for determining severity of a fault of a medical imaging device comprising a plurality of subsystems, the method comprising:

obtaining initial input data from a user relating to the fault of the medical imaging device;

performing a first natural language processing analysis on the initial input data to determine a first severity score relating to a description of the fault;

analysing the initial input data and the plurality of subsystems to determine a second severity score relating to the subsystems of the medical imaging device; and

determining an overall severity score indicating a severity of the fault based on the first severity score and the second severity score;

wherein the method further comprises for a plurality of log files associated with respective subsystems of the medical imaging device, generating a prioritized list of the plurality of log files based on the determined severity of the fault.

10 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

determining a third severity score relating to a priority of a user of the medical imaging device,

and wherein determining an overall severity score is further based on the third severity score.

11 . The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

applying a weighting to the overall severity score based on at least one of: the first severity score; the second severity score; and a parameter value of a log file identified for the fault.

12 . A method for diagnosing a fault of a medical imaging device, the method comprising:

determining the relevance of log file content to a fault of a medical imaging device according to claim 1 ;

determining a severity of the fault of the medical imaging device; and

generating a prioritized list of the log files based on the determined relevance of the plurality of log files and the determined severity of the fault of the medical imaging device, and preferably further based on a parameter value of each log file, such as log file size.

13 . A computer program comprising code configured to implement the method of claim 1 when executed on a processing system.

14 . A system for determining a relevance of log files to a fault of a medical imaging device, the medical imaging device comprising a plurality of subsystems, and each log file being associated with a respective subsystem of the medical imaging device, the system comprising:

a data interface configured to obtain initial problem input data relating to the fault of the medical imaging device;

a natural language processing component configured to perform a first natural language processing analysis on the initial problem input data to identify one or more features of the medical imaging device fault; and

a machine learning algorithm configured to receive one or more features of the medical imaging device fault, the machine learning algorithm being trained to output a prediction result comprising a fault probability for each of the plurality of subsystems of the medical imaging device, a fault probability indicating a likelihood that the fault of the medical imaging device originated from the subsystem; and

a processor configured to determine, for each log file, a relevance score based on the obtained prediction result; and

wherein the processor is further configured to:

generate a prioritized list of the log files based on the determined relevance of a plurality of log files; and

transmit the log files in the prioritized list over a data communication channel to a remote processing device, and in a priority order defined by the prioritized list, the remote processing device being configured for analysing the transmitted log files and for diagnosing the fault of the medical imaging device based on a result of the analysing.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2024
From: GAO, QI; PATIL, MERU ADAGOUDA; PAUL, SOUBHIK; BUSSA, NAGARAJU
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 067356/0160 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 21209234 · Nov 19, 2021 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250013519A1 · Jan 9, 2025
References Cited (11)
US 6882271B2 · Hendrickson · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 11157373B2 · Alcorn · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20170302540A1 · Monahan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190007282A1 · Hsieh · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200089983A1 · Manickam · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210133054A1 · Alcorn · 2021 [cited by applicant]
EP 3336636B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
IN 201821035006A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion Dated Feb. 15, 2023 For International Application No. PCT/EP2022/082168 Filed Nov. 17, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Kahles, et al: “Automating Root Cause Analysis via Machine Learning in Agile Software Testing Environments”, Proceedings—2019 IEEE 12th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation, ICST 201… [cited by applicant]
Du, et al: “DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep Learning”, in Proceedings of the 24 th ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 17). Dallas, TX, USA: ACM, Nov… [cited by applicant]