IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,657,505
Granted Patent B2
US 12,657,505 · App. 18/724,850 · Granted Jun 16, 2026

Efficient quantum error correction in neutral atoms by conversion to erasure errors

Inventors: Jeffrey Thompson (Princeton, NJ); Shimon Kolkowitz (Madison, WI)
Assignees: THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY; WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
G06N10/70G06N10/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,657,505
App. No.
18/724,850
Granted
Jun 16, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for quantum error correction includes: trapping and/or manipulating an array of qubits that include encoded neutral atoms or ions and forms a computational space; encoding the array of qubits to a state characterized in that an error during at least one of an idling, gate, or other operation results in a respective qubit transition to a disjointed state where that error can be detected without disturbing the qubits remaining in the computational space; performing a syndrome measurement of a quantum error correcting code; identifying the presence and location of an error by detecting the corresponding neutral atom or ion has left the computational space after performing the operation; identifying a logical error in the quantum error correcting code associated with a loss of qubit information based on the identified error location and results of the syndrome measurement; and adjusting subsequent computational steps based on the identified logical error.

Claims (59)

1 . A system for quantum error correction, comprising:

a quantum system comprising an array of qubits;

an optical system configured to trap, manipulate, and/or detect the array of qubits using light;

a processor; and

a memory, including instructions stored thereon, which when executed by the processor, cause the quantum system to:

trap and/or manipulate the array of qubits by the optical system, wherein the array of qubits includes encoded neutral atoms or ions and forms a computational space;

encode each qubit in the array of qubits to a state characterized in that an error during at least one operation including idling, a gate, or other operation, results in a respective qubit transition to a disjointed state where that error can be detected without disturbing the qubits remaining in the computational space, wherein the array of qubits form a quantum error correcting code and the detected error comprises an erasure error;

perform a syndrome measurement of a quantum error correcting code;

identify a presence and location of an error by detecting that the corresponding neutral atom or ion has left the computational space after performing the at least one operation;

identify a logical error in the quantum error correcting code associated with a loss of qubit information based on the identified error location and results of the syndrome measurement; and

adjust subsequent computational steps based on the identified logical error.

2 . The quantum system of claim 1 , wherein adjusting subsequent computational steps includes at least one of fixing the error or rejecting the results of a portion of the computation and repeating the portion of the computation.

3 . The quantum system of claim 1 , wherein for the gate operation the instructions when executed by the processor further cause the quantum system to:

process the qubits in accordance with the gate operation, wherein the gate operation is performed by optical coupling of qubits to an excited state;

detect the error by detecting that the corresponding neutral atom or ion has left the computational space after performing the gate operation;

identify the location or a time of the detected error; and

replace or reinitialize an atom or an ion of a qubit associated with the detected error.

4 . The quantum system of claim 1 , wherein during idling or a gate operation, errors may be caused by Raman or Rayleigh scattering, or spontaneous decay, which results in a transition outside of the computational space.

5 . The quantum system of claim 4 , wherein the instructions when executed by the processor, further cause the quantum system to:

optically pump metastable states other than computational states to a ground state to facilitate detection while avoiding transitions into the computational space.

6 . The quantum system of claim 5 , where population in the ground states is detected using cycling fluorescence on a transition that does not disturb the computational space.

7 . The quantum system of claim 3 , wherein during a gate operation, wherein the excited state comprises a highly excited Rydberg state and errors may be caused by thermal photons via absorption or simulated emission while in the excited state, which results in a transition outside of the computational space.

8 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the instructions when executed by the processor, further cause the quantum system to:

directly detect a population remaining in Rydberg states at an end of each gate operation without performing error syndrome measurements with ancilla qubits.

9 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the detection is performed by:

optically pumping metastable states other than computational states to a ground state to facilitate detection while avoiding transitions into the computational space.

10 . The quantum system of claim 9 , wherein the detection is further performed by:

detecting atoms in trapped Rydberg states by waiting for the atoms to decay to the ground state and detecting cycling fluorescence from the ground state.

11 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the detection is performed by:

detecting atoms remaining in Rydberg states by ionizing them using an autoionizing excitation on a core electron and then detecting cycling fluorescence from the same transition in the ion.

12 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the detection is performed by:

detecting atoms remaining in Rydberg states by ionizing them using an autoionizing excitation and detecting ions directly with an ion detector and ion optics.

13 . The quantum system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions when executed by the processor, further cause the quantum system to:

encode a qubit in metastable electronic states, wherein a transition outside of those states are indicative of an error.

14 . The quantum system of claim 13 , wherein the qubits comprise 171-ytterbium atoms, and the encoding states comprise hyperfine states of a 6s6p 3 P 0 F=1/2 level in 171 Yb.

15 . The system of claim 1 , wherein transitions outside of the computational space are detected by measuring a 6s 2 1 S 0 ground state population, using cycling fluorescence on the 6s 2 1 S 0 ->6s6p 1 P 1 transition with a wavelength near 399 nm, which does not disturb atoms remaining in the computational space.

16 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the highly excited Rydberg state comprises a state belonging to a 6sns 3 S 1 F=3/2 Rydberg level with principal quantum number n substantially within a range of 40-100.

17 . The quantum system of claim 7 , wherein the highly excited Rydberg state includes Rydberg levels with a Rydberg electron having orbital angular momentum L=0, L=1 or L=2, and principal quantum number substantially within a range of 40-100, and a total angular momentum F=1/2, 3/2, or 5/2.

18 . The system of claim 7 , wherein a population remaining in Rydberg states at an end of the gate is converted into Yb + ions by driving a 6s 1/2 ->6p 1/2 inner electron transition near 369 nm, resulting in autoionization.

19 . The system of claim 7 , wherein Yb + ions are detected using cycling fluorescence on the Yb + ion 6s 1/2 ->6p 1/2 transition with a wavelength near 369 nm, which does not disturb ions remaining in the computational space.

20 . The quantum system of claim 1 , wherein the instructions when executed by the processor, further cause the quantum system to:

replace, using an optical tweezer, each neutral atom or ion that has left the computational space with a replacement neutral atom or ion having a predefined state.

21 . A method for quantum error correction, comprising:

trapping and/or manipulating an array of qubits, wherein the array of qubits includes encoded neutral atoms or ions and forms a computational space;

encoding the array of qubits to a state characterized in that an error during at least one operation including idling, a gate, or other operation results in a respective qubit transition to a disjointed state where that error can be detected without disturbing the qubits remaining in the computational space, wherein the array of qubits form a quantum error correcting code and the detected error comprises an erasure error;

performing a syndrome measurement of a quantum error correcting code;

identifying the presence and location of an error by detecting the corresponding neutral atom or ion has left the computational space after performing the at least one operation;

identifying a logical error in the quantum error correcting code associated with a loss of qubit information based on the identified error location and results of the syndrome measurement; and

adjusting subsequent computational steps based on the identified logical error.

22 . A quantum system for quantum error correction, comprising:

an optical system configured to trap, manipulate, and/or detect an array of qubits using light;

a processor; and

a memory, including instruction stored thereon, which when executed by the processor, cause the quantum system to:

trap and/or manipulate the array of qubits, wherein the array of qubits includes encoded neutral atoms or ions and forms a computational space;

encode the array of qubits to a state characterized in that an error during at least one of an idling, gate, or other operation results in a respective qubit transition to a disjointed state where that error can be detected without disturbing the qubits remaining in the computational space;

for each gate operation detect an erasure error and replace or reinitialize an atom or an ion of a qubit associated with the detected erasure error;

identify an error location within the quantum error correcting code based on the detected error;

identify a logical error in the quantum error correcting code associated with a loss of qubit information based on the identified error location; and

adjust the subsequent computational steps to correct the error.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 20, 2025
From: KOLKOWITZ, SHIMON
To: WISCONSIN ALUMNI RESEARCH FOUNDATION
Reel/Frame 070275/0017 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY DATA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 67860 FRAME 216. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jul 24, 2024
From: THOMPSON, JEFFREY
To: THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 068564/0274 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2024
From: THOMPSON, JEFFREY; KOLKOWITZ, SHIMON
To: THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 067860/0216 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63296080 · Jan 3, 2022
Related Publication 20250165843A1 · May 22, 2025
References Cited (15)
US 11748652B1 · Kubica · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20160112066A1 · Ashikhmin · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200116623A1 · Cooper-Roy · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200334101A1 · Albert · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210124640A1 · Nickerson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210264310A1 · Gottesman · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210383189A1 · Cong · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220198311A1 · Delfosse · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220216884A1 · Delfosse · 2022 [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2023/010045 dated May 3, 2023, pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Cong, I. et al., “Hardware-Efficient, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Rydberg Atoms” arXiv:2105.13501v1 (May 2021) pp. 1-29. [cited by applicant]
Madjarov, Y. et al., “High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms” arXiv:2001.04455v2 (Nov. 2020) pp. 1-16. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report issued by the European Patent Office in connection with International Application No. 23735184.6, dated Oct. 22, 2025. [cited by applicant]
M. Grassl, et al., “Codes for the Quantum Erasure Channel”, Cornell University Library, Oct. 28, 1996, pp. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
James M. Auger, et al., “A blueprint for fault-tolerant quantum computation with Rydberg atoms”, Cornell University Library, Jul. 20, 2017, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]