IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,443,871
Granted Patent B2
US 12,443,871 · App. 18/734,466 · Granted Oct 14, 2025

Scalable tensor-network-based noise mitigation for near-term quantum computing

Inventors: Guillermo García Pérez (Helsinki, FI); Sergei Filippov (Helsinki, FI)
Assignee: ALGORITHMIQ OY
G06N10/40G06N3/042
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,443,871
App. No.
18/734,466
Granted
Oct 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one aspect, there is provided a noise mitigation method for an execution of a quantum circuit by a quantum processor. In another aspect, there is provided a computing system comprising a quantum processor and a classical computer, the computing system being configured to carry out the method. In another aspect, there is a computer program product including instructions which, when the program is carried out by a computer system comprising a classical computer and a quantum processor, cause the computer system to carry out the method. In another aspect, there is provided a computer program product including instructions which, when the program is carried out by a classical computer, cause the classical computer to carry out the tensor network contractions according to the method.

Claims (47)

1. A noise mitigation method for a noisy physical execution of a quantum circuit by a quantum processor, the method comprising:

establishing a model of a noisy physical execution of the quantum circuit by the quantum processor, the model being representative of a noisy physical execution of a unitary operation by the quantum processor which results in a noisy final physical state of N qudits of the quantum processor, the model being represented by a quantum channel, wherein a density operator is at least an approximation of the noisy final physical state of the N qudits of the quantum processor;

executing the noisy physical execution of the quantum circuit one or more times by the quantum processor by applying a sequence of G physical operations to the N qudits of the quantum processor to thereby obtain a set of measurement outcomes for each execution of the quantum circuit, wherein each measurement outcome comprises a physical quantum measurement applied to the noisy final physical state of the N qudits after each execution of the quantum circuit by the sequence of G physical operations;

deriving a quasi-state tensor network representation of a quasi-state comprising an approximation of the density operator of the noisy final state based on the set of measurement outcomes of the execution of the quantum circuit and a set of dual effects corresponding to the set of measurement outcomes;

deriving an observable tensor network representation of a Hermitian operator associated with an observable for a system of N qudits;

deriving a noise mitigation tensor network representation of a noise mitigation map, wherein the noise mitigation map is a concatenation of an inverse of the quantum channel followed by a unitary operation, wherein each of the tensor network representations comprises respectively a plurality of quasi-state tensors, observable tensors and noise mitigation tensors;

providing the quasi-state tensor network representation, the observable tensor network representation and the noise mitigation tensor network representation to a classical computer; and

executing, by the classical computer, a tensor network contraction algorithm to thereby calculate a value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for a final quantum state of the N qudits of the quantum circuit, the tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting a tensor network representation in terms of the quasi-state tensors, the observable tensors and the noise mitigation tensors according to a predetermined contracting rule of physical and virtual indices of the tensors to thereby obtain a noise mitigated value of an expectation value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for the final quantum state of the quantum circuit.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the noisy physical execution of the unitary operation is by an application of a sequence of one or more quantum gates, each quantum gate being described by a gate unitary operation, and wherein establishing the model comprises partitioning the sequence of quantum gates in one or more subsequences of quantum gates, each of the subsequences comprising one or more quantum gates which are executed subsequently and/or simultaneously and being described by a subsequence unitary operation, wherein each subsequence of quantum gates comprises a single quantum gate or a single layer of quantum gates, and wherein establishing the model comprises establishing for each subsequence of quantum gates a subsequence model representative of the noisy physical execution of the subsequence unitary operation by the quantum processor and being described by a subsequence channel.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein establishing a respective subsequence model comprises applying quantum process tomography to the noisy implementation of the respective subsequence of quantum gates described by the subsequence unitary operation by the quantum processor to thereby determined the respective subsequence channel.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the respective subsequence channel is modelled as the concatenation of the respective subsequence unitary operation and a noise channel representative of the noise in the execution of the respective subsequence of quantum gates by the quantum processor.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation comprises deriving a first tensor network representation of a first map comprising a plurality of first tensors, deriving for an inverse of each subsequence channel, an inverse channel tensor network representation comprising a plurality of inverse channel tensors, and deriving for each subsequence unitary operation, a subsequence tensor network representation comprising a plurality of subsequence tensors, and wherein deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation of the noise mitigation map is by an execution of a first tensor network contraction algorithm by the classical computer, the first tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting the first tensors, inverse channel tensors and subsequence tensors according to a predetermined first contraction rule to thereby obtain the noise mitigation tensors.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the first tensor network contraction algorithm further comprising a compression of the tensors resulting from the contraction of at least some of the first tensors, the inverse channel tensors and the subsequence tensors to thereby obtain noise mitigation tensors with a bond dimension below a predetermined threshold value.

7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the first tensor network contraction algorithm comprises an iterative contraction procedure following a rule for iteratively composing the noise mitigation map from 2K maps in T steps, the rule comprising specifying an initial map M 1 comprising one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps, wherein a t-th map M t , t≥2, is defined according to M t =L t ∘M t−1 or M t =M t−1 ∘R t or M t =L t ·M t−1 ∘R t , wherein L t and R t are one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps such that M T is equal to the noise mitigation map, and wherein the iterative contraction procedure comprises a step of deriving a tensor network representation of M 1 comprising the subsequence and/or inverse channel tensors of the 2K maps whose composition results in M 1 , and T−1 iterative steps, wherein in the t-th iterative step, t=1, . . . , T−1, a (t+1)-th tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representations of M, and the tensor network representation of respective ones of R t+1 and L t+1 according to a (t+1)-th contraction rule to thereby obtain a plurality of (t+1)-th tensors of the (t+1)-th tensor network representation.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein for at least one iterative step, the first tensor network contraction algorithm comprises instruction for compressing the (t+1)-th tensors such that their bond dimension is below a predetermined threshold value.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein compressing the tensors comprises an execution of a truncation algorithms or an application of a variational algorithm.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representation of M t according to the (t+1)-th contraction rule.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one tensor network representation comprises at least one tensor associated with each qudit, and a single tensor associated with each qudit, wherein the tensor B [k] associated with the k-th qudit has at least one physical index and at least one virtual index.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein for at least one operator or map Q, the respective tensor network representation is a matrix product operator representation, Q=Σ a 1 , . . . ,a N=0 X−1 A a 0 [0] ⊗A a 0 a 1 [1] ⊗ . . . ⊗A a N−3 a N−2 [N−2] ⊗A a N−2 [N−1] , wherein for any values of the virtual indicies a k−1 , a k the map A a k−1 a k [k] is acting on the k-th qudit, the map A a 0 [0] is acting on the 0-th qubit and the map A a N−2 [N−1] is acting on the (N−1)-th qubit, and wherein χ is the bond dimension.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein for at least one operator or map, the operator or map of the respective tensor network representation is a projected entangled pair operator representation or a tree tensor network representation.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the effects are L-producible, L≥1, i.e., each effect is a tensor product of operators each of which is acting on at most L qudits, i.e., Π m(k 0 , . . . , k N−1 ) =Π k 0 (0) ⊗Π k 1 (1) ⊗ . . . ⊗Π k r−1 (r−1) , wherein Π k n (n) acts on at most L qudits.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein deriving at least one of the tensor network representations is at least partially carried out by an algorithm executed by the classical computer.

16. A computing system comprising a quantum processor and a classical computer, the computing system being configured to establish a model of a noisy physical execution of a quantum circuit by the quantum processor, the model being representative of a noisy physical execution of a unitary operation U by the quantum processor which results in a noisy final physical state of N qudits of the quantum processor, the model being represented by a quantum channel, wherein a density operator is at least an approximation of the noisy final physical state of the N qudits of the quantum processor;

execute the noisy physical execution of the quantum circuit one or more times by the quantum processor by applying a sequence of G physical operations to the N qudits of the quantum processor to thereby obtain a set of measurement outcomes for each execution of the quantum circuit, wherein each measurement outcome comprises a physical quantum measurement applied to the noisy final physical state of the N qudits after each execution of the quantum circuit by the sequence of G physical operations;

derive a quasi-state tensor network representation of a quasi-state comprising an approximation of the density operator of the noisy final state based on the set of measurement outcomes of the execution of the quantum circuit and a set of dual effects corresponding to the set of measurement outcomes;

derive an observable tensor network representation of a Hermitian operator which is associated with an observable for a system of N qudits;

derive a noise mitigation tensor network representation of a noise mitigation map, wherein the noise mitigation map is a concatenation of an inverse of the quantum channel followed by a unitary operation, wherein each of the tensor network representations comprises respectively a plurality of quasi-state tensors, observable tensors and noise mitigation tensors;

provide the quasi-state tensor network representation, the observable tensor network representation and the noise mitigation tensor network representation to a classical computer; and

execute, by the classical computer, a tensor network contraction algorithm to thereby calculate a value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for a final quantum state of the N qudits of the quantum circuit, the tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting a tensor network representation of in terms of the quasi-state tensors, the observable tensors and the noise mitigation tensors according to a predetermined contracting rule of physical and virtual indices of the tensors to thereby obtain a noise mitigated value of an expectation value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for the final quantum state of the quantum circuit.

17. A non-transitory computer program product including instructions which, when the program is carried out by a computer system comprising a classical computer and a quantum processor, cause the computer system to:

establish a model of a noisy physical execution of a quantum circuit by the quantum processor, the model being representative of a noisy physical execution of a unitary operation by the quantum processor which results in a noisy physical final state of N qudits of the quantum processor, the model being represented by a quantum channel, wherein a density operator is at least an approximation of the noisy final physical state of the N qudits of the quantum processor;

execute the noisy physical execution of the quantum circuit one or more times by the quantum processor by applying a sequence of G physical operations to the N qudits of the quantum processor to thereby obtain a set of measurement outcomes for each execution of the quantum circuit, wherein each measurement outcome comprises a physical quantum measurement applied to the noisy final physical state of the N qudits after each execution of the quantum circuit by the sequence of G physical operations;

derive a quasi-state tensor network representation of a quasi-state comprising an approximation of the density operator of the noisy final state based on the set of measurement outcomes of the execution of the quantum circuit and a set of dual effects corresponding to the set of measurement outcomes;

derive an observable tensor network representation of a Hermitian operator which is associated with an observable for a system of N qudits;

derive a noise mitigation tensor network representation of a noise mitigation map, wherein the noise mitigation map is a concatenation of an inverse of the quantum channel ε followed by a unitary operation, wherein each of the tensor network representations comprises respectively a plurality of quasi-state tensors, observable tensors and noise mitigation tensors;

provide the quasi-state tensor network representation, the observable tensor network representation and the noise mitigation tensor network representation to a classical computer; and

execute, by the classical computer, a tensor network contraction algorithm to thereby calculate a value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for a final quantum state of the N qudits of the quantum circuit, the tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting a tensor network representation in terms of the quasi-state tensors, the observable tensors and the noise mitigation tensors according to a predetermined contracting rule of physical and virtual indices of the tensors to thereby obtain a noise mitigated value of an expectation value of the observable associated with the Hermitian operator for the final quantum state of the quantum circuit.

18. The computing system of claim 16 , wherein:

the noisy physical execution of the unitary operation is by an application of a sequence of one or more quantum gates, each quantum gate being described by a gate unitary operation, and wherein establishing the model comprises partitioning the sequence of quantum gates in one or more subsequences of quantum gates, each of the subsequences comprising one or more quantum gates which are executed subsequently and/or simultaneously and being described by a subsequence unitary operation, wherein each subsequence of quantum gates comprises a single quantum gate or a single layer of quantum gates, and wherein establishing the model comprises establishing for each subsequence of quantum gates a subsequence model representative of the noisy physical execution of the subsequence unitary operation by the quantum processor and being described by a subsequence channel; and

deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation comprises deriving a first tensor network representation of a first map comprising a plurality of first tensors, deriving for the inverse of each subsequence channel, an inverse channel tensor network representation comprising a plurality of inverse channel tensors, and deriving for each subsequence unitary operation, a subsequence tensor network representation comprising a plurality of subsequence tensors, and wherein deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation of the noise mitigation map is by an execution of a first tensor network contraction algorithm by the classical computer, the first tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting the first tensors, inverse channel tensors and subsequence tensors according to a predetermined first contraction rule to thereby obtain the noise mitigation tensors.

19. The computing system of claim 18 , wherein the first tensor network contraction algorithm comprises an iterative contraction procedure following a rule for iteratively composing the noise mitigation map from 2K maps in T steps, the rule comprising specifying an initial map M 1 comprising one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps, wherein a t-th map M t , t≥2, is defined according to M t =L t ∘M t−1 or M t =M t−1 ∘R, or M t =L t ∘M t−1 ∘R t , wherein Lt and Rt are one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps such that M T is equal to the noise mitigation map, and wherein the iterative contraction procedure comprises a step of deriving a tensor network representation of M 1 comprising the subsequence and/or inverse channel tensors of the 2K maps whose composition results in M 1 , and T−1 iterative steps, wherein in the t-th iterative step, t=1, . . . , T−1, a (t+1)-th tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representations of M, and the tensor network representation of respective ones of R t+1 and L t+1 according to a (t+1)-th contraction rule to thereby obtain a plurality of (t+1)-th tensors of the (t+1)-th tensor network representation.

20. The computing system of claim 19 , wherein the tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representation of Mt according to the (t+1)-th contraction rule.

21. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein:

the noisy physical execution of the unitary operation is by an application of a sequence of one or more quantum gates, each quantum gate being described by a gate unitary operation, and wherein establishing the model comprises partitioning the sequence of quantum gates in one or more subsequences of quantum gates, each of the subsequences comprising one or more quantum gates which are executed subsequently and/or simultaneously and being described by a subsequence unitary operation, wherein each subsequence of quantum gates comprises a single quantum gate or a single layer of quantum gates, and wherein establishing the model comprises establishing for each subsequence of quantum gates a subsequence model representative of the noisy physical execution of the subsequence unitary operation by the quantum processor and being described by a subsequence channel; and

deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation comprises deriving a first tensor network representation of a first map comprising a plurality of first tensors, deriving for the inverse of each subsequence channel, an inverse channel tensor network representation comprising a plurality of inverse channel tensors, and deriving for each subsequence unitary operation, a subsequence tensor network representation comprising a plurality of subsequence tensors, and wherein deriving the noise mitigation tensor network representation of the noise mitigation map is by an execution of a first tensor network contraction algorithm by the classical computer, the first tensor network contraction algorithm including instructions for contracting the first tensors, inverse channel tensors and subsequence tensors according to a predetermined first contraction rule to thereby obtain the noise mitigation tensors.

22. The computing program product of claim 21 , wherein the first tensor network contraction algorithm comprises an iterative contraction procedure following a rule for iteratively composing the noise mitigation map from 2K maps in T steps, the rule comprising specifying an initial map M 1 comprising one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps, wherein a t-th map M t , t≥2, is defined according to M t =L t ∘M t−1 or M t =M t−1 ∘R t or M t =L t ∘M t−1 ∘R t , wherein L t and R t are one of the 2K maps or a composition of a plurality of the 2K maps such that M is equal to the noise mitigation map, and wherein the iterative contraction procedure comprises a step of deriving a tensor network representation of M 1 comprising the subsequence and/or inverse channel tensors of the maps whose composition results in M 1 , and T−1 iterative steps, wherein in the t-th iterative step, t=1, . . . , T−1, a (t+1)-th tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representations of Mt and the tensor network representation of respective ones of R t+1 and L t+1 according to a (t+1)-th contraction rule to thereby obtain a plurality of (t+1)-th tensors of the (t+1)-th tensor network representation.

23. The computing program product of claim 22 , wherein the tensor network representation of M t+1 is derived by contracting the tensor network representation of M t according to the (t+1)-th contraction rule.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2024
From: GARCÍA PÉREZ, GUILLERMO; FILIPPOV, SERGEI
To: ALGORITHMIQ OY
Reel/Frame 067630/0875 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2023065131 · Jun 6, 2023
Related Publication 20240412091A1 · Dec 12, 2024
References Cited (48)
US 20220092460A1 · Piveteau · 2022 [cited by examiner]
Filippov et al. “Matrix product channel: Variationally optimized quantum tensor network to mitigate noise and reduce errors for the variational quantum eigensolver”, Dec. 20, 2022, arXiv:2212.10225v1, pp. 1-11. (Year: 2… [cited by examiner]
J. Preskill, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation,” in Introduction to Quantum Computation and Information (1998) pp. 213-269. [cited by applicant]
D. Gottesman, “Opportunities and challenges in fault-tolerant quantum computation” (2022), arXiv:2210.15844 [quant-ph], 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Y. Suzuki, et al., “Quantum error mitigation as a universal error reduction technique: Applications from the nisq to the fault-tolerant quantum computing eras,” PRX Quantum 3, 010345 (2022), 33 pages. [cited by applicant]
F. D. Malone, et al., “Towards the simulation of large scale protein-ligand interactions on NISQ-era quantum computers,” Chemical Science 13, 3094 (2022), 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. J. M. Kirsopp, et al., “Quantum computational quantification of protein-ligand interactions,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 122, e26975 (2021), 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. Robert, et al., “Resource-efficient quantum algorithm for protein folding,” npj Quantum Information 7, 1 (2021), 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. D. Guimarães, et al., “Noise-assisted digital quantum simulation of open systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14592 (2023), 19 pages. [cited by applicant]
K. Temme, et al., “Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017), 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Y. Li and S. C. Benjamin, “Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimisation,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017), 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Endo, et al., “Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications,” Phys. Rev. X 8, 031027 (2018), 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
E. Van Den Berg, et al., “Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse pauli-lindblad models on noisy quantum processors,” Nature Physics, 1 (2022), 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Y. Guo and S. Yang, “Quantum error mitigation via matrix product operators,” PRX Quantum 3, 040313 (2022), 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
G. García-Pérez, et al., “Learning to measure: Adaptive informationally complete generalized measurements for quantum algorithms,” PRX Quantum 2, 040342 (2021), 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
H.-Y. Huang, et al., “Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements,” Nature Physics 16, 1050 (2020), 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
C. Hadfield, et al., “Measurements of quantum hamiltonians with locally-biased classical shadows,” Communications in Mathematical Physics 391, 951 (2022), 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
H.-Y. Huang, et al., “Efficient estimation of Pauli observables by derandomization,” Physical Review Letters 127, 030503 (2021), 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. I. Cirac, et al., “Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems,” Rev. Nod. Phys. 93, 015003 (2021), 72 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. Miller, et al., “The bonsai algorithm: grow your own fermion-toqubit mapping,” arXiv preprint ar Xiv:2212.09731 (2022), 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. H. Werner, et al., “Positive tensor network approach for simulating open quantum many-body Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 237201 (2016), 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
G. Torlai, et al., “Quantum process tomorgraphy with unsupervised learning and tensor networks,” Nature Communications 14, 2858 (2023), 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Srinivasan, et al., “Towards a trace-preserving tensor network representation of quantum channels,” in Second Workshop on Quantum Tensor Networks in Machine Learning, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing … [cited by applicant]
S. Filippov, et al., “Matrix product channel: Variationally optimized quantum tensor network to mitigate noise and reduce errors for the variational quantum eigensolver,” arXiv:2212. 10225v (2022), 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
D. Perez-García, et al., “Matrix product state representations,” Quantum Information and Computation 7, 401 (2007), 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
F. Verstraete, et al., “Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems,” Advances in Physics 57, 143 (2008), 83 pages. [cited by applicant]
U. Schollwöck, “The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states,” Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), 118 pages. [cited by applicant]
C. Hubig, et al., “Generic construction of efficient matrix product operators,” Physical Review B 95, 035129 (2017), 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Montangero, et al., Introduction to tensor network methods (Springer, 2018), 172 pages. [cited by applicant]
M. R. Geller and Z. Zhou, “Efficient error models for fault-tolerant architectures and the pauli twirling approximation,” Phys. Rev. A 88. 012314 (2013), 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, “Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling,” Phys. Rev.A 94, 052325 (2016), 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Boyd and L. Vandenberghe, Introduction to applied linear algebra: vectors, matrices, and least squares (Cambridge university press, 2018), 473 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. Gray, “Quimb: A python package for quantum information and many-body calculations,” Journal of Open Source Software 3. 819 (2018), 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. Gray and S. Kourtis, “Hyper-optimized tensor network contraction,” Quantum 5, 410 (2021), 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010), 710 pages. [cited by applicant]
E. Nielsen, et al., “Gate set tomography,” Quantum 5, 557 (2021), 59 pages. [cited by applicant]
F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, “Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully,” Phys. Rev. B 73, 091123 (2006), 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
D. Gottesman, “The heisenberg representation of quantum computers,” arXiv preprint quant-ph/9807006 (1998), 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Aaronson and D. Gottesman, “Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits,” Phys. Rev. A 70. 052328 (2001), 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Anders and H. J. Briegel, “Fast simulation of stabilizer circuits using a graph-state representation,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 022331 (2006), 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
C. Gidney, “Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator,” Quantum 5, 497 (2021), 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. Peruzzo, et al., “A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor,” Nature Communications 5. 1 (2014), 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. R. McClean, et al., “The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms,” New Journal of Physics 18. 023023 (2015), 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
M. L. (https://mathoverflow.net/users/143/michael lugo), “Sum of ‘the first k’ binomial coefficients for fixed N,” MathOverflow (2017), https://mathoverflow.net/q/17236 (version: Oct. 1, 2017), https://mathoverflow.net/… [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/EP2023/065131 dated Jan. 18, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
S. Filippov, et al., “Matrix product channel: Variationally optimized quantum tensor network to mitigate noise and reduce errors for the variational quantum eigensolver,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 OLIN … [cited by applicant]
G. Garcia-Perez, et al., “Virtual linear map algorithm for classical boost in near-term quantum computing,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 OLIN Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY, arXiv.2207.01360v1, Jul.… [cited by applicant]
Y. Guo, et al., “Quantum error mitigation via matrix product operators,” arxiv.org, Cornell University Library, 201 OLIN Library Cornell University Ithaca, NY, arXiv:2201.00752v4, Aug. 7, 2022, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]