IP Library Granted Patent US 12,367,504
Granted Patent B2
US 12,367,504 · App. 18/759,931 · Granted Jul 22, 2025

Systems and methods for match evaluation based on change in telematics inferences via a telematics marketplace

Inventor: Kenneth Jason Sanchez (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: QUANATA, LLC
G06Q30/0201B60W40/09G06N5/04G06Q30/0204B60W2556/55
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,367,504
App. No.
18/759,931
Granted
Jul 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer implemented including: collecting, via one or more sensors, a first set of operator data associated with a first group of vehicle operators during a first time period; determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and using one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the first set of operator data, a first set of telematics inferences, the one or more trained machine learning models being trained using training data sets comprising sensor data associated with a second group of vehicle operators to predict telematics inferences; collecting, via the one or more sensors, a second set of operator data associated with the first group of vehicle operators during a second time period; determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and based on the second set of operator data, a second set of telematics inferences; determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators, one or more match evaluations based at least in part upon the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences; and modifying one or more weights of the one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the one or more match evaluations. Other embodiments are described.

Claims (56)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

collecting, via one or more sensors, a first set of operator data associated with a first group of vehicle operators during a first time period;

determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and using one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the first set of operator data, a first set of telematics inferences, the one or more trained machine learning models trained using training data sets comprising sensor data associated with a second group of vehicle operators to predict telematics inferences, and the one or more trained machine learning models comprising one or more of a reinforcement learning model or a convolutional neural network;

collecting, via the one or more sensors, a second set of operator data associated with the first group of vehicle operators during a second time period;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and based on the second set of operator data, a second set of telematics inferences;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators, one or more match evaluations based at least in part upon one or more differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences; and

modifying one or more weights of the one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the one or more match evaluations associated with the differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences comprise, respectively, one or more of:

a predicted profitability and an actual profitability;

a predicted period of retention and an actual period of retention;

a predicted revenue and an actual revenue;

predicted costs and actual costs; or

one or more predicted behavioral scores and one or more actual behavioral scores.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the one or more match evaluations comprises determining whether one or more actual metrics of the second set of telematics inferences exceed, meet, or fall below one or more predicted metrics of the first set of telematics inferences.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first time period occurs prior to a user acquisition by one or more marketplace participants; and

the second time period occurs after the user acquisition by the one or more marketplace participants.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more sensors are controlled by one or more mobile applications used by the first group of vehicle operators.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the one or more mobile applications comprise a system software application, an entertainment software application, a gaming software application, a navigation software application, or an environment software application.

7. A system comprising one or more processors and one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

collecting, via one or more sensors, a first set of operator data associated with a first group of vehicle operators during a first time period;

determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and using one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the first set of operator data, a first set of telematics inferences, the one or more trained machine learning models trained using training data sets comprising sensor data associated with a second group of vehicle operators to predict telematics inferences, and the one or more trained machine learning models comprising one or more of a reinforcement learning model or a convolutional neural network;

collecting, via the one or more sensors, a second set of operator data associated with the first group of vehicle operators during a second time period;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and based on the second set of operator data, a second set of telematics inferences;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators, one or more match evaluations based at least in part upon one or more differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences; and

modifying one or more weights of the one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the one or more match evaluations associated with the differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences comprise, respectively, one or more of:

a predicted profitability and an actual profitability;

a predicted period of retention and an actual period of retention;

a predicted revenue and an actual revenue;

predicted costs and actual costs; or

one or more predicted behavioral scores and one or more actual behavioral scores.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein determining the one or more match evaluations comprises determining whether one or more actual metrics of the second set of telematics inferences exceed, meet, or fall below one or more predicted metrics of the first set of telematics inferences.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein:

the first time period occurs prior to a user acquisition by one or more marketplace participants; and

the second time period occurs after the user acquisition by the one or more marketplace participants.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more sensors are controlled by one or more mobile applications used by the first group of vehicle operators.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the one or more mobile applications comprise a system software application, an entertainment software application, a gaming software application, a navigation software application, or an environment software application.

13. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computing instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

collecting, via one or more sensors, a first set of operator data associated with a first group of vehicle operators during a first time period;

determining, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and using one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the first set of operator data, a first set of telematics inferences, the one or more trained machine learning models trained using training data sets comprising sensor data associated with a second group of vehicle operators to predict telematics inferences, and the one or more trained machine learning models comprising one or more of a reinforcement learning model or a convolutional neural network;

collecting, via the one or more sensors, a second set of operator data associated with the first group of vehicle operators during a second time period;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators and based on the second set of operator data, a second set of telematics inferences;

determining and updating, for each vehicle operator of the first group of vehicle operators, one or more match evaluations based at least in part upon one or more differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences; and

modifying one or more weights of the one or more trained machine learning models based at least in part upon the one or more match evaluations associated with the differences between the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences.

14. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein the first set of telematics inferences and the second set of telematics inferences comprise, respectively, one or more of:

a predicted profitability and an actual profitability;

a predicted period of retention and an actual period of retention;

a predicted revenue and an actual revenue;

predicted costs and actual costs; or

one or more predicted behavioral scores and one or more actual behavioral scores.

15. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein determining the one or more match evaluations comprises determining whether one or more actual metrics of the second set of telematics inferences exceed, meet, or fall below one or more predicted metrics of the first set of telematics inferences.

16. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein:

the first time period occurs prior to a user acquisition by one or more marketplace participants; and

the second time period occurs after the user acquisition by the one or more marketplace participants.

17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 13 , wherein the one or more sensors are controlled by one or more mobile applications used by the first group of vehicle operators.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 11, 2024
From: SANCHEZ, KENNETH JASON
To: BLUEOWL, LLC
Reel/Frame 067961/0273 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jul 11, 2024
From: BLUEOWL, LLC
To: QUANATA, LLC
Reel/Frame 068281/0734 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 17493660 · Oct 4, 2021
Related Publication 20240354784A1 · Oct 24, 2024
References Cited (189)
US 7424438B2 · Vianello · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7818588B2 · Duri et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7904219B1 · Lowrey et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7917253B2 · Inbarajan et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7937278B1 · Cripe et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8044809B2 · Farmer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8136146B2 · Hahn et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8140359B2 · Daniel · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8160952B1 · Fell et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8239220B2 · Kidd et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8364613B1 · Lin et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8527302B2 · Johnson, Jr. et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8554600B2 · Reisman · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8560456B2 · Williams · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8577703B2 · Mcclellan et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8595034B2 · Bauer et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8712893B1 · Brandmaier et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8731627B2 · Inabathuni et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8892451B2 · Everett et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9082072B1 · Wedding, Jr. et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9087332B2 · Bagherjeiran et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9135756B2 · Doughty et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9306924B2 · Lehmann · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9489640B2 · Neuhauser et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10134042B1 · Prasad et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10163163B1 · He et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10185999B1 · Konrardy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10216485B2 · Misra et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10360576B1 · Hsu-Hoffman · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10360601B1 · Adegan · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10373257B1 · Iqbal et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10423982B2 · Wasserman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10430745B2 · Rani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10462225B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10510120B1 · Roll · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10580081B2 · Rackley, III et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10664920B1 · Roll et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10676097B1 · Goldfarb et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10713728B1 · Roll et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11676014B1 · Hallac · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20030139179A1 · Fuchs et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030200121A1 · Santoloci · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040139034A1 · Farmer · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040153362A1 · Bauer et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040180647A1 · Schwinke et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050197889A1 · Prigogin et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060053038A1 · Warren et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060253307A1 · Warren et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070016542A1 · Rosauer et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027726A1 · Warren et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080288889A1 · Hunt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090002148A1 · Horvitz · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090006870A1 · Duri et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090089160A1 · Oesterling · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090109037A1 · Farmer · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100017236A1 · Duddle et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100030582A1 · Rippel et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100030586A1 · Taylor et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100076646A1 · Basir et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100114734A1 · Giuli et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100131303A1 · Collopy et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100268619A1 · Farmer · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110130916A1 · Mayer · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120036038A1 · Farmer · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120066007A1 · Ferrick · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120072244A1 · Collins et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120271689A1 · Etheredge et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120290308A1 · Detwiller et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120303203A1 · Olsen et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138460A1 · Schumann, Jr. et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130179198A1 · Bowne et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130190967A1 · Hassib · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130204813A1 · Master et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130244210A1 · Nath et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140032045A1 · Smirnov et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140058761A1 · Freiberger et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140164579A1 · Douthitt et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140172467A1 · He et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140195272A1 · Sadiq et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229207A1 · Swamy et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140278574A1 · Barber · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140316825A1 · Van Dijk et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140350970A1 · Schumann, Jr. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140359552A1 · Misra et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140372221A1 · Momin et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379523A1 · Park · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150134455A1 · Gorpynich et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150158486A1 · Healey et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150228004A1 · Bednarek et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150269681A1 · Kalinadhabhotla · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150294565A1 · Follmer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150370251A1 · Siegel et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160035020A1 · Du Preez · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160203278A1 · Shoemaker · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160225095A1 · Biemer et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160267396A1 · Gray et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170053295A1 · Tiell et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170054611A1 · Tiell · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170124660A1 · Srivastava · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170255966A1 · Khoury · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170255981A1 · Van Niekerk et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170257345A1 · Westra et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170364821A1 · Mathur et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025430A1 · Perl et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180075380A1 · Perl et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180260908A1 · Collopy et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180300816A1 · Perl et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180315318A1 · Farnham, IV et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190031097A1 · O'herlihy et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190050870A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190050904A1 · Wasserman et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190086229A1 · Chintakindi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102689A1 · Lassoued et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102840A1 · Perl · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190147513A1 · Giuli et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190347582A1 · Allen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190384870A1 · Shiraishi et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200013498A1 · Gelber · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103892A1 · Cella et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200108840A1 · Andres et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200126324A1 · Hutchins et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200211122A1 · Chen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200357075A1 · Dahl · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20230033876A1 · Villero et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
AU 2018101217 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
BG 2743 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107845039 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108171708 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 108492053 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CN 109118055 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110852894 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
GB 2523227 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
GB 2548738 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 4494791 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
KR 101823015 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
KR 102129324 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006062693 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008071064 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014106299 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015187558 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017195228 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018007953 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020015526 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
16. L Longhi, M Nanni et al. (Car telematics big data analytics for insurance and innovative mobility services)—Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized . . . , 2020 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
M Siami, M Naderpour, J Lu (A mobile telematics pattern recognition framework for driving behavior extraction) Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020—ieeexplore.ieee.org 2020. [cited by applicant]
M Mccarthy, M Seidi, S Mohan, J Hopkin . . . (Access to in-vehicle data and resources) Study comissioned . . . , 2017—michaellsena.com). 2017. [cited by applicant]
Abdelraham et al., “Data-driven Robust Scoring Approach for Driver Profiling Applications”, doi: 10.1109/glocom.2018.8647971, Dec. 2018, pp. 1-6. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Alghuson, “An Integrated Score-Based Traffic Law Enforcement and Network Management in Connected Vehicle Environment”, Southern Methodist University, 2020, pp. 1-227. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Analytics and insights services that help you understand your book of business and individual customers from every angle, Insurance & Mobility Solutions, Retrieved from https://ims.tech/analytics/, Jul. 2020, 11 pages. … [cited by applicant]
Baecke et al., “The value of vehicle telematics data in insurance risk selection processes”, Decision Support Systems, vol. 98, Jun. 2017, pp. 69-79. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Bian et al., “Good drivers pay less: A study of usage-based vehicle insurance models”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 107, 2018, pp. 20-34. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Bourque, “eBay-Like Bidding Meets Facebook with Social Media Auction App BuddyBid”, SocialMediaToday, Retrieved from https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/ebay-like-bidding-meets-facebook-with-social-media-auction-app-b… [cited by applicant]
Cheng et al., Research on safe Driving Scoring System and Personalized Ratemaking of Vehicle Insurance based on OBD Data, The 3rd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering (ICCSE'18). Doi:10.11453265689.… [cited by applicant]
Crawford, Bradley, “Mew Methods of Payment and New Forms of Money”, Banking & Finance Law Review 20:3: 393-409. HAB Press Limited, Toronto, Canada (Year:2004). 2004. [cited by applicant]
Driving score, “Score and rate consistently from multiple sources”, Risk Solutions, Retrieved from https://risk.lexisnexis.com/products/driving-score, Jul. 2020, pp. 1-3. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Duri et al., “Data Protection and Data Sharing in Telematics”, Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 9, No. 6, 2004, pp. 693-701. 2004. [cited by applicant]
Duri et al. “Framework for Security and Privacy in Automotive Telematics”, In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Mobile commerce, 2002, pp. 25-32. 2002. [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., “A Comparison of Underwriting Decision Making Between Telematics-Enabled UBI and Traditional Auto Insurance”, Advances in Managment and Applied Economics, vol. 7, No. 1, 2017, pp. 17-30. 2017. [cited by applicant]
FICO Safe Driving Score, Retrieved from https://www.fico.com/en resource-download-file/4571. See highlighted sections, Jan. 2023, 3 pages. 2020. [cited by applicant]
FloowDrive, “The Floow”, Retrieved from https://www.theflow.com/our-solutions/flowdrive, Jul. 2020, pp. 1-7 2020. [cited by applicant]
Floowscore, “The Floow”, Retrieved from https://www.thefloow.com/our-solutions/floowscore/, Jul. 2020, pp. 1-3. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Garrison et al., “New Verisk Data Exchange Integration for Insurance Telematic Now Available on the Geotab Marketplace”, Verisk, Retrieved from https://www.verisk.com/press-release/2020/may-verisk-data-exchange-integrat… [cited by applicant]
Honcho launches reverse auction car insurance app, Finextra, Retrieved from https://www.fixextra.com/ pressarticle/79851/honcho-launches-reverse-auction-car-insurance-app, Sep. 2019, pp. 1-4. 2019. [cited by applicant]
How does the car insurance tier system affect my premium?, Cover, Retrieved from https://cover.com/blog/car-insurance-tiers/, Jan. 2020, pp. 1-5. 2020. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040272, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 8 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040282, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 9 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040291, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 10 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040295, mailed on Oct. 15, 2021, 8 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040308, mailed on Oct. 14, 2021, 7 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040314, mailed on Oct. 15, 2021, 7 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040317, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 13 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040320, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 12 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040325, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 10 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2021/040329, mailed on Oct. 5, 2021, 11 pages. 2021. [cited by applicant]
Lavendelis et al., “Multi-Agent Auction Based Simulation Tool for an Insurance Policy Market”, Applied Computer Systems, vol. 15, No. 1, 2014, pp. 5-13. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “A risky driving behavior scoring model for the personalized automobile insurance pricing”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering, ICCSE'17. doi: 10.1145/3126973.31… [cited by applicant]
Machine Learning and FICO Scores, FICO Decisions, Retrieved from https://www.mba.org/assets/Documents/Member%20White%20Papers/Machine_Learning_and_FICO_Scores_4611WP_EN.pdf, 2018, pp. 1-11. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Maerien et al., “A Secure Multi-Application Platform for Vehicle Telematics”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 1988, IEEE 38th, 2010, pp. 1-6. 2010. [cited by applicant]
Reininger et al., “A first look at vehicle data collection via smartphone sensors”, In 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), 2015, pp. 1-6. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Siami et al., “Generating a Risk Profile for Car Insurance Policyholders: a Deep Learning Conceptual Model”, In Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 2017, pp. 1-8. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Snapshot, ConnectedWorld, Retrieved from https://connectedworld.com/product-items/snapshot/, Aug. 2020, 5 pages. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Telematics Exchange, LexisNexis-Risk Solutions, Retrieved from https://risk.lexisnexis.com/products/telematics-exchange, Jul. 2020, pp. 1-3. 2020. [cited by applicant]
Toledo et al., “Can feedback from in-vehicle data recorders improve drive behavior and reduce fuel consumption?”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 94, 2016, pp. 194-204. 2016. [cited by applicant]
Tramer et al., “Stealing Machine Learning Models via Prediction APIs”, Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Symposium, August 215, pp. 601-618. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Verma, “Multi-tenancy redefined with admin partitions”, https://www.citrix.com/blogs/2014/11/20/multi-tenancy-redefined-with-admin-partitions/, Nov. 2014, 5 pages. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Weidner et al., “Telematics driving profile classification in car insurance pricing”, Annals of actuarial science, vol. 11, No. 2, 2017, pp. 213-236. 2017. [cited by applicant]
Werner, “Analytics behind the perfect risk score & predictive model”, Retrieved from https://testbacblog.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/click-here-to-access-octos-white-paper.pdf, Oct. 2018, 12 pages. 2018. [cited by applicant]
Werner, “Increased data connectivity set to take telematics based auto insurance in new directions”, Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180908034100/https://www.willistowerswatson.com/en-us/insights/2016/08/ne… [cited by applicant]
“Commercial Vehicle Telematics Market Report,” Proquest Document ID: 2047381839, Asia News Monitor Jun. 1, 2018. [cited by applicant]