IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,352,162
Granted Patent B2
US 12,352,162 · App. 18/760,237 · Granted Jul 8, 2025

Fluid holdup monitoring in downhole fluid sampling tools

Inventors: Zhonghuan Chen (Houston, TX); Bin Dai (Houston, TX); Christopher Michael Jones (Houston, TX); Wei Zhang (Houston, TX)
Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
E21B49/081G01N9/32G01N21/3577G01N2021/178
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,352,162
App. No.
18/760,237
Granted
Jul 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods to identify fluid holdups during downhole fluid sampling operations includes obtaining, using a sampling tool positioned within a wellbore, one or more fluid measurements using at least one sensor having a first set of spatial resolution, obtaining one or more second fluid measurements having a second spatial resolution, calculating a first fluid ratio using the at least one sensor having the first set of spatial resolution measurements, calculating a second fluid ratio of the second fluid measurements using the at least one sensor having the second set of spatial resolution, wherein the second set of spatial resolution is lower than the first set of spatial resolution, and identifying fluid holdup within the sampling tool when the differences between the two fluid ratios are higher than a limit or a similarity of the two fluid ratios are lower than a limit.

Claims (39)

1. A method to identify fluid holdups during downhole fluid sampling operations, the method comprising:

obtaining, using a sampling tool positioned within a wellbore, one or more fluid measurements using at least one sensor having a first set of spatial resolution;

obtaining, using the sampling tool, one or more second fluid measurements having a second spatial resolution;

calculating a first fluid ratio using the at least one sensor having the first set of spatial resolution measurements;

calculating a second fluid ratio of the second fluid measurements using the at least one sensor having the second set of spatial resolution, wherein the second set of spatial resolution is lower than the first set of spatial resolution; and

identifying fluid holdup within the sampling tool when differences between the two fluid ratios are higher than a limit or a similarity of the two fluid ratios are lower than a limit.

2. The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are mud ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

3. The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are formation fluid ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

4. The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor having a first set of spatial resolution is selected from the group of sensors consisting of an optical spectroscopy, index of refraction, fluorescence, a laser, and any combination thereof.

5. The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the at least one sensor having a second spatial resolution is selected from the group of sensors consisting of a density, capacitance, dielectric spectroscopy, viscosity sensor, and any combination thereof.

6. The method as defined in claim 1 , further comprising flushing the fluid holdups out of the sampling tool.

7. A system to identify fluid holdups during downhole fluid sampling operations, the system comprising:

a fluid sampling tool comprising:

a first spatial resolution sensor; and

a second spatial resolution sensor; and

processing circuitry to perform operations comprising:

obtaining, using the first spatial resolution sensor, one or more fluid measurements;

obtaining, using the second spatial resolution sensor, one or more fluid measurements, wherein the second spatial resolution sensor has a lower spatial resolution than the first spatial resolution sensor;

calculating a first fluid ratio using the first spatial resolution sensor;

calculating a second fluid ratio using the second spatial resolution sensor; and

identifying fluid holdup within the fluid sampling tool when differences between the two fluid ratios are higher than a limit or a similarity of the two fluid ratios are lower than a limit.

8. The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are mud ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

9. The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are formation fluid ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

10. The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein the at least one sensor having a first set of spatial resolution is selected from the group of sensors consisting of an optical spectroscopy, index of refraction, fluorescence, a laser, and any combination thereof.

11. The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein the at least one sensor having a second spatial resolution is selected from the group of sensors consisting of a density, capacitance, dielectric spectroscopy, viscosity sensor, and any combination thereof.

12. The system as defined in claim 7 , further comprising flushing the fluid holdups out of the sampling tool.

13. The system as defined in claim 7 , wherein identifying the fluid holdup within the sampling tool is performed in real time.

14. A non-transitory computer program product including instruction which, when executed by at least one processor, causes the processor to a method comprising:

obtaining, using a sampling tool positioned within a wellbore, one or more fluid measurements using first spatial resolution sensor;

obtaining, using the sampling tool, one or more fluid measurements using a second spatial resolution sensor, wherein the second spatial resolution sensor has a lower spatial resolution than the first spatial resolution sensor;

calculating a first fluid ratio using the first spatial resolution sensor;

calculating a second fluid ratio using the second spatial resolution sensor; and

identifying fluid holdup within the sampling tool when differences between the two fluid ratios are higher than a limit or a similarity of the two fluid ratios are lower than a limit.

15. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are mud ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

16. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , wherein the first and second fluid ratios are formation fluid ratios of the first and second fluid measurements.

17. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , wherein the first spatial resolution sensor is selected from the group of sensors consisting of an optical spectroscopy, index of refraction, fluorescence, a laser, and any combination thereof.

18. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , wherein the second spatial resolution sensor is selected from the group of sensors consisting of a density, capacitance, dielectric spectroscopy, viscosity sensor, and any combination thereof.

19. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , further comprising flushing the fluid holdups out of the sampling tool.

20. The non-transitory computer program product as defined in claim 14 , wherein identifying the fluid holdup within the sampling tool is performed in real time.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2024
From: CHEN, ZHONGHUAN; DAI, BIN; JONES, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL; ZHANG, WEI
To: HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 067884/0782 →
Continuity (2)
Division 17572684 · Jan 11, 2022
Related Publication 20240352854A1 · Oct 24, 2024
References Cited (22)
US 5361632A · Magnani · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5631413A · Young et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6028307A · Young et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7316166B2 · Atkinson · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7408645B2 · DiFoggio · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 10927672B2 · Dai et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11808147B2 · Chen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12055038B2 · Chen · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20060139646A1 · DiFoggio · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20100206063A1 · Fujisawa et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120018152A1 · Zuilekom et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140096957A1 · van Zuilekom et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170198574A1 · Donzier et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180245465A1 · Khan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210332699A1 · Dai et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230220771A1 · Chen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
CN 202451148 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019052235 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2022/011917, dated Sep. 27, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/572,684 dated Sep. 20, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/572,684 dated Dec. 8, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 17/572,684 dated Mar. 21, 2024. [cited by applicant]