Message routing optimization system
Disclosed are systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media for message routing optimization. The message routing optimization system receives requests to transmit messages to recipient devices. The message routing optimization system determines whether to allocate the messages to an optimal routing provider or a secondary routing provider. The message routing optimization ranks the set of routing providers based on a conversion rate index and determines the optimal routing and secondary routing providers based on the ranking. The message routing optimization system allocates messages to the selected routing providers to be delivered to their intended recipients.
1. A method, comprising:
forwarding, by one or more processors, a first plurality of messages to a plurality of routing providers;
receiving feedback data comprising a plurality of feedback indicators reflecting message delivery to respective message recipients by the plurality of routing providers;
determining, based on the feedback data, for each routing provider of the plurality of routing providers, an upper confidence bound of a corresponding performance level; and
identifying, based on the upper confidence bounds of the performance levels, a subset of the plurality of routing providers.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feedback data includes live feedback data and testing feedback data, wherein the live feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting user messages by the plurality of routing providers, and wherein the testing feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting test messages by the plurality of routing providers.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
allocating a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocating a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers;
wherein the first number of messages exceeds the second number of messages.
4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
allocating, based on a predefined allocation ratio, a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocating, based on the predefined allocation ratio, a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
allocating a plurality of messages of a second plurality of messages to a first routing provider of the subset of the plurality of routing providers, wherein the first routing provider exhibits a highest upper confidence bound of the performance level among the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a performance level of a routing provider is an estimated likelihood of a successful delivery to an intended recipient of a message of the first plurality of messages allocated to the routing provider.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feedback data characterizes one of: a transmission of a message of the first plurality of messages by a routing provider, a receipt of the message by its intended recipient, a predefined action performed by the intended recipient, or an amount of time elapsed until the message was received by the intended recipient.
8. A system, comprising:
a memory; and
one or more processors, coupled to the memory, the one or more processors configured to:
forward a first plurality of messages to a plurality of routing providers;
receive feedback data comprising a plurality of feedback indicators reflecting message delivery to respective message recipients by the plurality of routing providers;
determine, based on the feedback data, for each routing provider of the plurality of routing providers, an upper confidence bound of a corresponding performance level; and
identify, based on the upper confidence bounds of the performance levels, a subset of the plurality of routing providers.
9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the feedback data includes live feedback data and testing feedback data, wherein the live feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting user messages by the plurality of routing providers, and wherein the testing feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting test messages by the plurality of routing providers.
10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
allocate a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocate a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers;
wherein the first number of messages exceeds the second number of messages.
11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
allocate, based on a predefined allocation ratio, a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocate, based on the predefined allocation ratio, a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:
allocate a plurality of messages of a second plurality of messages to a first routing provider of the subset of the plurality of routing providers, wherein the first routing provider exhibits a highest upper confidence bound of the performance level among the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
13. The system of claim 8 , wherein a performance level of a routing provider is an estimated likelihood of a successful delivery to an intended recipient of a message of the first plurality of messages allocated to the routing provider.
14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the feedback data characterizes one of: a transmission of a message of the first plurality of messages by a routing provider, a receipt of the message by its intended recipient, a predefined action performed by the intended recipient, or an amount of time elapsed until the message was received by the intended recipient.
15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising executable instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
forward a first plurality of messages to a plurality of routing providers;
receive feedback data comprising a plurality of feedback indicators reflecting message delivery to respective message recipients by the plurality of routing providers;
determine, based on the feedback data, for each routing provider of the plurality of routing providers, an upper confidence bound of a corresponding performance level; and
identify, based on the upper confidence bounds of the performance levels, a subset of the plurality of routing providers.
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the feedback data includes live feedback data and testing feedback data, wherein the live feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting user messages by the plurality of routing providers, and wherein the testing feedback data characterizes message delivery performance of transmitting test messages by the plurality of routing providers.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising executable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
allocate a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocate a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers;
wherein the first number of messages exceeds the second number of messages.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising executable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
allocate, based on a predefined allocation ratio, a first number of messages of a second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers of the subset of the plurality of routing providers; and
allocate, based on the predefined allocation ratio, a second number of messages of the second plurality of messages to one or more routing providers that do not belong to the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising executable instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to:
allocate a plurality of messages of a second plurality of messages to a first routing provider of the subset of the plurality of routing providers, wherein the first routing provider exhibits a highest upper confidence bound of the performance level among the subset of the plurality of routing providers.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the feedback data characterizes one of: a transmission of a message of the first plurality of messages by a routing provider, a receipt of the message by its intended recipient, a predefined action performed by the intended recipient, or an amount of time elapsed until the message was received by the intended recipient.