IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,709,001
Granted Patent B2
US 12,709,001 · App. 18/764,343 · Granted Aug 18, 2026

Learning-based tensegrity robot joint

Inventors: Ka-Wai Kwok (Hong Kong, HK); Yifeng Hao (Hong Kong, HK)
Assignee: The University of Hong Kong
B25J9/1075B25J9/163
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,709,001
App. No.
18/764,343
Filed
Jul 4, 2024
Granted
Aug 18, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3618
USPC
74/490.05
Abstract

A tensegrity joint comprising: a first inner structure having a first frame and a first strut extending orthogonally from the first frame; a second inner structure having a second frame and a second strut extending orthogonally from the second frame; at least three actuation tendons, each being fixed at a respective hole at the first frame and being guided and allowed to slide through a respective hole at the second frame; a central tendon connecting an apex of the first strut and an apex of the second strut such that the central tendon is in balance with the pulling forces exerted by the at least three actuation tendons; and an outer elastic protection sheath configured to wrap around a cylindrical surface between the first and second inner structures.

Claims (39)

1 . A tensegrity joint comprising:

a first inner structure having a first frame and a first strut extending orthogonally from the first frame;

a second inner structure having a second frame and a second strut extending orthogonally from the second frame;

at least three actuation tendons, each being fixed at a respective hole at the first frame and being guided and allowed to slide through a respective hole at the second frame;

a central tendon connecting an apex of the first strut and an apex of the second strut such that the central tendon is in balance with the pulling forces exerted by the at least three actuation tendons;

an outer elastic protection sheath configured to wrap around a cylindrical surface between the first and second inner structures; and

a fiber-Bragg-gratings sensor wounded helically around and embedded inside the outer elastic protection sheath and configured for sensing configurations of the tensegrity joint in real time for closed-loop feedback control.

2 . The tensegrity joint of claim 1 , wherein the outer elastic protection sheath is prestressed to pull the first and second inner structures to each other to provide resistance to torsional force and restore the tensegrity joint to an original or natural equilibrium.

3 . The tensegrity joint of claim 1 , wherein the first strut and the second strut are positioned relative to each other at a level to allow the tensegrity joint to bend at a bending angle.

4 . The tensegrity joint of claim 1 , wherein each of the actuation tendons and central tendon is made of braided metal wires.

5 . The tensegrity joint of claim 1 , wherein the first and second frames are circular.

6 . The tensegrity joint of claim 1 , wherein the first and second struts are “L”-shaped.

7 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 1 , wherein the outer elastic protection sheath is made of silicone.

8 . A learning-based tensegrity robot joint, comprising:

the tensegrity joint of claim 1 ; and

a learning-based controller configured for controlling the tensegrity joint.

9 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the outer elastic protection sheath is prestressed to pull the first and second inner structures to each other to provide resistance to torsional force and restore the tensegrity joint to an original or natural equilibrium.

10 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the first strut and the second strut are positioned relative to each other at a level to allow the tensegrity joint to bend at a bending angle.

11 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein each of the actuation tendons and central tendon is made of braided metal wires.

12 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the first and second frames are circular.

13 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the first and second struts are “L”-shaped.

14 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the outer elastic protection sheath is made of silicone.

15 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , further comprising at least three motors for pulling the at least three actuation tendons respectively.

16 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , wherein the learning-based controller is trained on basis of a training dataset prepared by a sampling technique including:

generating, based on a geometric model of the tensegrity joint, an actuation sequence containing initial tendon configurations; and

executing all the initial tendon configurations contained in the generated actuation sequence and correcting, during actual joint movement, each of the initial tendon configurations in a torque-control manner by multiple trials of releasing and pulling the tendon individually.

17 . The learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 16 , wherein the learning-based controller is further trained on basis of sensing feedback provided by the fiber-Bragg-gratings sensor.

18 . A method for training the learning-based tensegrity robot joint of claim 8 , the method comprising:

training the learning-based controller of the learning-based tensegrity robot joint on basis of a first training dataset prepared by a sampling technique;

installing an end-effector on the learning-based tensegrity robot joint;

commanding the learning-based controller to move the end-effector to move along a spiral path for a plurality of pre-set distances within a workspace;

tracking a tip position of the end-effector by a tracker and detecting a strain change of the outer elastic protection sheath by the fiber-Bragg-gratings sensor after the end-effector is moved with each of the pre-set distances; and

collecting the tracked tip positions and detected strain changes to form a second training dataset to train the learning-based controller to operate as a close-loop controller.

19 . The method according to claim 18 , wherein the geometric model is deduced by assuming:

there is no axial rotation of the central tendon in the absence of external disturbance; and

the central tendon is perpendicular to the first frame.

20 . The method according to claim 16 , wherein the sampling technique includes:

generating, based on a geometric model of the tensegrity joint, an actuation sequence containing initial tendon configurations; and

executing all the initial tendon configurations contained in the generated actuation sequence and correcting, during actual joint movement, each of the initial tendon configurations in a torque-control manner by multiple trials of releasing and pulling the tendon individually.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 8, 2024
From: KWOK, KA-WAI; HAO, YIFENG
To: THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG
Reel/Frame 068206/0796 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63512911 · Jul 11, 2023
Related Publication 20250018558A1 · Jan 16, 2025
References Cited (45)
US 11400585B2 · Manfredi · 2022 [cited by examiner]
“Soft Tensegrity Robots” video by Jean-Baptiste Mouret, uploaded on Jun. 28, 2018 and publicly available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuLQDhrk9tQ (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Vishal Ramadoss et al., “Hedra: A Bio-Inspired Modular Tensegrity Robot With Polyhedral Parallel Modules”, 2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft), 2022, p. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Jie Zhang et al., “Versatile Like a Seahorse Tail: A Bio-Inspired Programmable Continuum Robot for Conformal Grasping”, Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2022, vol. 4, No. 2200263, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Bitao Yao et al., “Sensorless and adaptive admittance control of industrial robot in physical human—robot interaction”, Robotics and Computer—Integrated Manufacturing, 2018, vol. 51, p. 158-168. [cited by applicant]
Weitian Wang et al., “Facilitating Human-Robot Collaborative Tasks by Teaching-Learning-Collaboration From Human Demonstrations”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2019, vol. 16, p. 640-653. [cited by applicant]
Jason Chan et al., “Active Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): Initial Experience with the TSolution One® TKA System”, Surgical Technology International, 2020, vol. 37, p. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Cécile Batailler et al., “Concepts and techniques of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: the Rosa knee system”, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2021, vol. 141, No. 12, p. 2049-2… [cited by applicant]
Huu Minh Le et al., “A Survey on Actuators-Driven Surgical Robots”, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2016, vol. 247, p. 323-354. [cited by applicant]
Anand Kumar Mishra et al., “Simba: Tendon-Driven Modular Continuum Arm with Soft Reconfigurable Gripper”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2017, vol. 4, No. 4, p. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Taehoon Lee et al., “Design of a 2DoF Ankle Exoskeleton with a Polycentric Structure and a Bi-Directional Tendon-Driven Actuator Controlled Using a PID Neural Network”, Actuators, 2021, vol. 10, No. 9, p. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Takahisa Kato et al., “Tendon-Driven Continuum Robot for Endoscopic Surgery: Preclinical Development and Validation of a Tension Propagation Model”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, vol. 20, p. 2252-2263. [cited by applicant]
D. B. Camarillo et al., “Mechanics Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Manipulators”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2008, vol. 24, No. 6, p. 1262-1273. [cited by applicant]
Yan Wang et al., “Design and Experimental Validation of a Miniaturized Robotic Tendon-Driven Articulated Surgical Drill for Enhancing Distal Dexterity in Minimally Invasive Spine Fusion”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mecha… [cited by applicant]
Massimo Vespignani et al., “Design of SUPERball v2, a Compliant Tensegrity Robot for Absorbing Large Impacts”, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2018, p. 2865-2871. [cited by applicant]
Yixiang Liu et al., “A Tensegrity-Based Inchworm-Like Robot for Crawling in Pipes With Varying Diameters”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, vol. 7, No. 4, p. 11553-11560. [cited by applicant]
Bingxing Chen et al., “Swimming Performance of a Tensegrity Robotic Fish”, Soft Robotics, 2019, vol. 6, No. 4, p. 520-531. [cited by applicant]
Yixiang Liu et al., “Development of a Bio-inspired Soft Robotic Gripper based on Tensegrity Structures”, 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2021, p. 7398-7403. [cited by applicant]
Wen-Yung Li et al., “New Soft Robot Hand Configuration with Combined Biotensegrity and Thin Artificial Muscle”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, vol. 5, p. 4345-4351. [cited by applicant]
Andrew P. Sabelhaus et al., “Inverse Statics Optimization for Compound Tensegrity Robots”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, vol. 5, p. 3982-3989. [cited by applicant]
Shuo Ma et al., “Tensegrity system dynamics based on finite element method”, Composite Structures, 2022, vol. 280, No. 114838, p. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Kun Wang et al., “Real2Sim2Real Transfer for Control of Cable-driven Robots via a Differentiable Physics Engine”, 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2023, p. 1-10. [cited by applicant]
Shuo Ma et al., “The Equilibrium and Form-Finding of General Tensegrity Systems with Rigid Bodies”, Engineering Structures, 2022, vol. 266, No. 114618, p. 1-30. [cited by applicant]
William R. Johnson III et al., “Sensor Tendons for Soft Robot Shape Estimation”, 2022 IEEE Sensors, 2022, p. 1-4. [cited by applicant]
Wen-Yung Li et al., “Shape Recognition of a Tensegrity With Soft Sensor Threads and Artificial Muscles Using a Recurrent Neural Network”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2021, vol. 6, No. 4, p. 6228-6234. [cited by applicant]
Ryota Kobayashi et al., “Soft Tensegrity Robot Driven by Thin Artificial Muscles for the Exploration of Unknown Spatial Configurations”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, vol. 7, p. 5349-5356. [cited by applicant]
Joran W. Booth et al., “Surface Actuation and Sensing of a Tensegrity Structure Using Robotic Skins”, Soft Robotics, 2021, vol. 8, p. 531-541. [cited by applicant]
Hing-Choi Fu et al., “Interfacing Soft and Hard: A Spring Reinforced Actuator”, Soft Robotics, 2020, vol. 7, p. 44-58. [cited by applicant]
Justin D. L. Ho et al., “Localized online learning-based control of a soft redundant manipulator under variable loading”, Advanced Robotics, 2018, vol. 32, p. 1168-1183. [cited by applicant]
Steven Lessard et al., “A Bio-Inspired Tensegrity Manipulator with Multi-DOF, Structurally Compliant Joints”, 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016, p. 5515-5520. [cited by applicant]
Davide Zappetti et al., “Dual Stiffness Tensegrity Platform for Resilient Robotics”, Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2022, vol. 4, No. 2200025, p. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Jie Zhang et al., “Novel Design of a Cable-Driven Continuum Robot With Multiple Motion Patterns”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2022, vol. 7, No. 3, p. 6163-6170. [cited by applicant]
Davide Zappetti et al., “Variable-Stiffness Tensegrity Spine”, Smart Materials and Structures, 2020, vol. 29, No. 075013, p. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Wei Liang et al., “A bioinspired robotic knee with controlled joint surfaces and adjustable ligaments”, Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2022, vol. 17, No. 066006, p. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Shuhei Ikemoto et al., “Development of a Modular Tensegrity Robot Arm Capable of Continuous Bending”, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2021, vol. 8, No. 774253, No. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
Yuhei Yoshimitsu et al., “Development of Pneumatically Driven Tensegrity Manipulator without Mechanical Springs”, 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, p. 1-6. [cited by applicant]
Seok Chang Ryu et al., “FBG-based Shape Sensing Tubes for Continuum Robots”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014, p. 3531-3537. [cited by applicant]
Kui Wang et al., “A Fast Soft Robotic Laser Sweeping System Using Data-Driven Modeling Approach”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023, vol. 39, No. 4, p. 3043-3058. [cited by applicant]
Kui Wang et al., “Large-Scale Surface Shape Sensing with Learning-Based Computational Mechanics”, Advanced Intelligent Systems, 2021, vol. 3, No. 2100089, p. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Xiaomei Wang et al., “Eye-in-Hand Visual Servoing Enhanced With Sparse Strain Measurement for Soft Continuum Robots”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, vol. 5, No. 2, p. 2161-2168. [cited by applicant]
Xiaomei Wang et al., “Learning-Based Visual-Strain Fusion for Eye-in-Hand Continuum Robot Pose Estimation and Control”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2023, vol. 39, p. 2448-2467. [cited by applicant]
Ka-Wai Kwok et al., “Dimensionality Reduction in Controlling Articulated Snake Robot for Endoscopy Under Dynamic Active Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2013, vol. 29, p. 15-31. [cited by applicant]
Yingqi Li et al., “Towards Adaptive Continuous Control of Soft Robotic Manipulator using Reinforcement Learning”, 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, p. 7074-7081. [cited by applicant]
J.Y. Zhang et al., “Adaptive force density method for form-finding problem of tensegrity structures”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, vol. 43, p. 5658-5673. [cited by applicant]
Nizar Bel Hadj Ali et al., “Analysis of clustered tensegrity structures using a modified dynamic relaxation algorithm”, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2011, vol. 48, p. 637-647. [cited by applicant]