IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,376,769
Granted Patent B2
US 12,376,769 · App. 18/816,729 · Granted Aug 5, 2025

Measuring oxygen saturation with quality metric reporting

Inventors: Kate LeeAnn Bechtel (Pleasant Hill, CA); Alex Michael Margiott (Dunbarton, NH); Jennifer Elizabeth Keating (Campbell, CA); Kimberly Merritt Shultz (Mountain View, CA); Scott Coleridge (New York, NY); Joseph Heanue (Oakland, CA)
Assignee: ViOptix, Inc.
A61B5/14552A61B5/4848A61B5/7221A61B5/7275A61B5/742A61B5/743A61B5/7475A61B2560/0214A61B2560/0425A61B2560/0475A61B2562/0238A61B2562/0242A61B2562/046
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,376,769
App. No.
18/816,729
Granted
Aug 5, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An oximeter probe determines an oxygen saturation for the tissue and determines a quality value for the oxygen saturation and associated measurements of the tissue. The quality value is calculated from reflectance data received at the detectors of the oximeter probe. The oximeter probe then displays a value for the oxygen saturation with the error value to indicate a quality level for the oxygen saturation and associated values used to calculate oxygen saturation.

Claims (46)

1. A method comprising:

providing an oximeter device;

using the oximeter device comprises making an oxygen saturation measurement of a tissue comprising emitting light from a source of the oximeter device into the tissue, and receiving light reflected from the tissue at detectors of the oximeter device in response to the emitted light, wherein a plurality of detector responses is obtained for the reflected light;

accessing data points for simulated reflectance curves stored in a memory of the oximeter device;

fitting the detector responses to the data points for the simulated reflectance curves to determine an absorption coefficient value for the tissue;

using the absorption coefficient value, determining an oxygen saturation value for the tissue;

calculating an error value from the fitting of the detector responses to the data points of the simulated reflectance curves, and using the error value, determining a quality metric value for the oxygen saturation value; and

displaying on a screen the oxygen saturation value and the quality metric value.

2. The method of claim 1 comprising when determining the quality metric value, performing a ratiometric calculation.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein calculating the error value comprises using a Tiknonov regularization calculation.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the quality metric value is displayed on the screen as a moving average value of quality metric values.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the quality metric value is displayed as a percentage value via a bar graph.

6. A method comprising:

providing an oximeter device;

using the oximeter device comprising making an oximeter measurement of a tissue comprising emitting light from a source of the oximeter device into the tissue, and receiving light reflected from the tissue at detectors of the oximeter device in response to the emitted light, wherein a plurality of detector responses is obtained for the reflected light;

accessing data points for simulated reflectance curves stored in a memory of the oximeter device;

fitting the detector responses to the data points for the simulated reflectance curves to determine a plurality of absorption coefficient values for the tissue for a plurality of oximeter measurements;

calculating an oximetry value for the tissue from a first absorption coefficient value of the plurality of absorption coefficient values for a first oximeter measurement of the plurality of oximeter measurements;

based on the first absorption coefficient value of the plurality of absorption coefficient values, calculating a first quality metric value for the oximetry value for the first oximeter measurement;

calculating a second quality metric value based on the first quality metric value and at least a second absorption coefficient value of the plurality of absorption coefficient values for at least a second oximeter measurement; and

displaying on a screen the oximetry value and the second quality metric value.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the second oximeter measurement is made before the first oximeter measurement.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein calculating the second quality metric value is based on the first quality metric value, the second absorption coefficient value of the plurality of absorption coefficient values for the second oximeter measurement, and a third absorption coefficient value of the plurality of absorption coefficient values for a third oximeter measurement.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the second and third oximeter measurements are made before the first oximeter measurement.

10. The method of claim 6 comprising calculating an error value from the fit of the detector responses to the data points of the simulated reflectance curves, and the error value is used is determining the second quality metric value.

11. The method of claim 6 wherein the second quality metric value is a moving average value of quality metric values.

12. The method of claim 6 wherein the second quality metric value is displayed as a percentage value via a bar graph.

13. The method of claim 8 wherein the second quality metric value is based on a time average of the first, second, and third absorption coefficient values for the first, second, and third oximeter measurements.

14. A method comprising:

providing an oximeter device;

using the oximeter device comprising making an oximetry measurement of a tissue comprising emitting light from a source of the oximeter device into the tissue, and receiving light reflected from the tissue at detectors of the oximeter device in response to the emitted light, wherein a plurality of detector responses is obtained for the reflected light;

accessing data points for simulated reflectance curves stored in a memory of the oximeter device;

fitting the detector responses to the data points for the simulated reflectance curves to determine an absorption coefficient value for the tissue;

based on the absorption coefficient value, calculating an oximetry value for the tissue;

determining a quality metric value for the oximetry value; and

displaying on a screen the oximetry value and the quality metric value.

15. The method of claim 14 comprising:

providing values for a predetermined detector relationship for the detectors and the reflected light;

comparing the detector responses for the detectors with the values for the predetermined detector relationship; and

based on the comparison of the detector responses with the values for the predetermined detector relationship, determining the quality metric value.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein the quality metric value is determined by performing a ratiometric calculation.

17. The method of claim 14 wherein the oximetry value is an oxygen saturation value for the tissue.

18. The method of claim 14 comprising calculating an error value from the fit of the detector responses to the dat points of the simulated reflectance curves, and the error value is used is determining the quality metric value.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the error value is calculated using a Tiknonov regularization calculation.

20. The method of claim 14 wherein the quality metric value is a moving average value of quality metric values.

21. The method of claim 14 wherein the quality metric value is displayed as a percentage value via a bar graph.

Continuity (7)
Continuation 18114185 · Feb 24, 2023
Continuation 17037545 · Sep 29, 2020
Continuation 15495194 · Apr 24, 2017
Provisional Application 62326673 · Apr 22, 2016
Provisional Application 62326630 · Apr 22, 2016
Provisional Application 62326644 · Apr 22, 2016
Related Publication 20240415427A1 · Dec 19, 2024
References Cited (35)
US 6385821B1 · Modgil et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7236813B2 · Parker · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7532919B2 · Soyemi et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8233955B2 · Al-ali et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8938279B1 · Heaton, II et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20030009092A1 · Parker · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040034294A1 · Kimball et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060053522A1 · Kimbell · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060211925A1 · Lamego et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070244377A1 · Cozad et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080242959A1 · Xu et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080319290A1 · Mao et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090253968A1 · Cho et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100005630A1 · Gitman et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100292549A1 · Shuler · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100298728A1 · Addison et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110205535A1 · Soller et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110224518A1 · Tindi et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110276276A1 · Kashyap et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120289801A1 · Yamaguchi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130023743A1 · Al-ali et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130317331A1 · Bechtel et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140046152A1 · Bechtel et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140049770A1 · Li · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140180043A1 · Addison et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140288386A1 · Zand et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150230758A1 · Ochs · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 0102816A2 · 1984 [cited by applicant]
EP 1889569B1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009090665A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010011763 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2010042264A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014026200 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016040534A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report, PCT Application PCT/US2017/029220, Aug. 3, 2017, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]