IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,570,236
Granted Patent B1
US 12,570,236 · App. 18/827,643 · Granted Mar 10, 2026

Vehicle movement restrictions premised on electronic keys

Inventor: Donna Long (Wichita Falls, TX)
Assignee: Engle Grange, LLC
B60R25/04B60R25/102B60R25/24G07C9/00309B60R2025/1016G07C2009/00793G07C2009/00984G07C2209/63
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,570,236
App. No.
18/827,643
Granted
Mar 10, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

An ignition start system in which authentication of a key is carried out twice, first to activate the ignition switch to allow starting the engine and second at the time prior to moving the vehicle from a parked position. The two step authentication prevents driving off in a car that has been started without having the key for security purposes and also to avoid inconvenient situations that can otherwise occur.

Claims (60)

1 . A method for preventing a motor vehicle from being driven away without its associated electronic key being present, comprising:

placing the motor vehicle in a park mode with the motor vehicle not started;

detecting depression of a brake pedal of the motor vehicle while the motor vehicle is in the park mode;

responsive to the detection of the depression of the brake pedal, perform a first code authentication using wireless signals to determine whether a particular electronic key device linked to the motor vehicle is then present within the motor vehicle;

determining whether the first code authentication was successful;

receiving a start request initiated by a user of the motor vehicle;

permitting, in response to the start request being received, the motor vehicle to be started if the first code authentication was determined to be successful provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed;

starting the motor vehicle if the permitting determines that the motor vehicle is permitted to be started;

subsequently determining after the starting of the motor vehicle whether the brake pedal is no longer depressed;

after the determining determines that after the starting of the motor vehicle the brake pedal is no longer depressed, requiring a second code authentication in order to permit the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location;

subsequently determining after the second key code authentication has been required, whether the brake pedal has been again depressed while the motor vehicle is in the park mode;

responsive to the detection of the brake pedal being again depressed, perform a second code authentication using wireless signals to determine whether a particular electronic key device linked to the motor vehicle is then present within the motor vehicle;

determining whether the second code authentication was successful; and

subsequently, if the determining determines that the second code authentication was successful and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be again depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location.

2 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

after the starting of the motor vehicle and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location without requiring the second code authentication therefor.

3 . The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the particular electronic key device provides a first electronic key used for the first code authentication and a second electronic key used for the second code authentication.

4 . The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein the particular electronic key device provides an electronic key for use with the first code authentication and the second code authentication.

5 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

subsequently, if the determining determines that the second code authentication was not successful, preventing the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode.

6 . The method as recited in claim 5 , wherein the method comprises:

after the starting of the motor vehicle and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location without requiring the second code authentication therefor.

7 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the particular electronic key device provides a first electronic key used for the first code authentication and a second electronic key used for the second code authentication.

8 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the particular electronic key device provides an electronic key for use with the first code authentication and the second code authentication.

9 . The method as recited in claim 6 , wherein the particular electronic key device used for the first code authentication is the same as the particular electronic key device used for the second code authentication.

10 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the particular electronic key device used for the first code authentication is the same as the particular electronic key device used for the second code authentication.

11 . The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises:

displaying a message to the user that the particular electronic key device is not detected if the determining determines that the second code authentication was unsuccessful.

12 . The method as recited in claim 11 , wherein the method comprises:

after the starting of the motor vehicle and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location without performing the second code authentication.

13 . The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the particular electronic key device used for the first code authentication is the same as the particular electronic key device used for the second code authentication.

14 . The method as recited in claim 1 ,

wherein the motor vehicle includes an antenna configured to detect the wireless signals within the motor vehicle, and

wherein the determining of whether the particular electronic key device linked to the motor vehicle is then present within the motor vehicle uses the antenna to detect the wireless signals.

15 . The method as recited in claim 14 , wherein the motor vehicle includes a start push button, and wherein the receiving of the start request initiated by the user of the motor vehicle comprises detecting a push on the start push button.

16 . The method as recited in claim 15 , wherein the method comprises:

after the starting of the motor vehicle and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location without performing the second code authentication.

17 . The method as recited in claim 16 , wherein the method comprises:

displaying a message to the user that the particular electronic key device is not detected if the determining determines that the second code authentication was unsuccessful.

18 . The method as recited in claim 17 , wherein the particular electronic key device used for the first code authentication is the same as the particular electronic key device used for the second code authentication.

19 . A motor vehicle, comprising:

a brake pedal application sensor operatively connected to a brake pedal;

a push to-start button;

a shifter lock; and

a controller operatively connected to the brake pedal application sensor, the push-to-start button, and the shifter lock, the controller configured to prevent a motor vehicle from being driven away without its associated electronic key being present by carrying out the operations of:

placing the motor vehicle in a park mode with the motor vehicle not started;

detecting, via the brake pedal application sensor, depression of the brake pedal of the motor vehicle while the motor vehicle is in the park mode;

responsive to the detection of the depression of the brake pedal, perform a first code authentication using wireless signals to determine whether a particular electronic key device linked to the motor vehicle is then present within the motor vehicle;

determining whether the first code authentication was successful;

receiving, via the push to-start button, a start request initiated by a user of the motor vehicle;

permitting, in response to the start request being received, the motor vehicle to be started if the first code authentication was determined to be successful provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed;

starting the motor vehicle if the permitting determines that the motor vehicle is permitted to be started;

subsequently determining, via the brake pedal application sensor, after the starting of the motor vehicle whether the brake pedal is no longer depressed;

after the determining determines that after the starting of the motor vehicle the brake pedal is no longer depressed, requiring a second code authentication in order to permit the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode by unlocking the shifter lock, such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location;

subsequently determining, via the brake pedal application sensor, after the second key code authentication has been required, whether the brake pedal has been again depressed while the motor vehicle is in the park mode;

responsive to the detection of the brake pedal being again depressed, perform a second code authentication using wireless signals to determine whether a particular electronic key device linked to the motor vehicle is then present within the motor vehicle;

determining whether the second code authentication was successful; and

subsequently, if the determining determines that the second code authentication was successful and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be again depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode by unlocking the shifter lock, such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location.

20 . The motor vehicle as recited in claim 19 , wherein the controller is further configured to carry out the operation of:

after the starting of the motor vehicle and provided that the brake pedal that was detected to be depressed has remained depressed, permitting the motor vehicle to be shifted from the park mode to a drive mode by unlocking the shifter lock, such that the motor vehicle can be driven to another location different than its present location without performing the second code authentication.

Continuity (8)
Continuation 17342260 · Jun 8, 2021
Continuation 17013366 · Sep 4, 2020
Continuation 16566618 · Sep 10, 2019
Continuation 16185459 · Nov 9, 2018
Continuation 15959029 · Apr 20, 2018
Continuation 14036250 · Sep 25, 2013
Division 12858071 · Aug 17, 2010
Provisional Application 61234434 · Aug 17, 2009
References Cited (56)
US 5150593A · Kobayashi · 1992 [cited by examiner]
US 5736935A · Lambropoulos · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6038666A · Hsu · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6236120B1 · Loraas · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6274946B1 · Maeda · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 6624741B1 · Dais et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6653747B1 · Proefke · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6727800B1 · Dutu · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 6788189B2 · Kikkawa et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6927671B2 · DeBono · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6950736B2 · Cho · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7084734B2 · Singh · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7392675B2 · Kito · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 8011214B2 · Katagiri · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 8193915B2 · McCall · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8548645B2 · Long · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8614622B2 · Van Wiemeersch et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9205807B2 · Van Wiemeersch et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9580044B2 · Van Wiemeersch et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9580045B2 · Holub et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10077021B2 · Long · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10189441B2 · Long · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10442397B2 · Long · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10766454B2 · Long · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030135321A1 · Kumazaki et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030137195A1 · Suzuki · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050166650A1 · Shimura · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20090031767A1 · Ko · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090151412A1 · Chung · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100191392A1 · Juzswik · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100255953A1 · McCullough et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110040426A1 · Long · 2011 [cited by examiner]
KR 100901292 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/858,071 mailed Mar. 29, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/858,071 mailed Aug. 5, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,250 mailed Jun. 20, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/036,250 mailed Feb. 23, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,029 mailed Aug. 6, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/959,029 mailed Dec. 12, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/185,459 mailed Feb. 25, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/185,459 mailed Jun. 7, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/566,618 mailed Nov. 26, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/566,618 mailed Feb. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/566,618 mailed May 1, 2020. [cited by applicant]
“Decision re IPR2020-01334—Granting Institution of Inter Parties Review 35 U.S.C. § 314” for U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,645 B2, dated Jan. 21, 2021. [cited by applicant]
“Patent Owner's Preliminary Response” for U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,645 B2, dated Nov. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
“Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,645”, IPR2020-01334, dated Aug. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Liu et al., “An Integrated Automobile Keyless Operation System”, eDrive, Inc., SAE International by Univ of California Berkeley, Aug. 5, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Stembera, “Master Thesis—Cryptanalysis of Hitag-2 Cipher”, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, May 13, 2011. [cited by applicant]
“Declaration of Scott Andrews in Support of Petition for Inter-Partes Review” for U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,645, IPR2020-01334, dated Aug. 25, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Claim Chart for U.S. Pat. No. 8,548,645, IPR2020-01334. [cited by applicant]
“Toyota Avalon Manual-2005” Jan. 2005. [cited by applicant]
Ni et al., “AES Security Protocol Implementation for Automobile Remote Keyless System”, Vehicular Technology Conference, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Schmitz et al., “A New State-of-the-Art Keyless Entry System”, International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, Feb. 23-26, 1998. [cited by applicant]
IPR2020-01334—Final Written Decision Determining All Challenged Claims Unpatentable Granting Petitioner's Motion to Seal Granting Petition's Motion for Entry of Protective Order 35 U.S.C. § 318(a) dated Jan. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]