IP Library Granted Patent US 12,552,532
Granted Patent B2
US 12,552,532 · App. 18/841,892 · Granted Feb 17, 2026

Method for landing a kite system, and kite system

Inventor: Benjamin Alves (Hannover, DE)
Assignee: SkySails Power GmbH
B64C31/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,552,532
App. No.
18/841,892
Granted
Feb 17, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method for landing a kite system ( 23 ), in which the kite system ( 23 ) comprises a kite ( 14 ) and a control pod ( 25 ). The kite ( 14 ) is held on the control pod ( 25 ) via a line system ( 24 ). The control pod ( 25 ) is held during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ) via a tether ( 15 ) on a ground-based attachment point ( 16, 44 ). A sail surface of the kite ( 14 ) is spanned by a first kite part ( 40 ) and a second kite part ( 41 ). A connection ( 36 ) which exists in the sail surface between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ) is separated such that the kite ( 14 ) assumes a different aerodynamic state and falls to the ground with the control pod ( 25 ). The invention also relates to a kite system.

Claims (12)

1 . A method for landing a kite system ( 23 ), wherein the kite system ( 23 ) comprises a kite ( 14 ) and a control pod ( 25 ), wherein the kite ( 14 ) is held on the control pod ( 25 ) via a line system ( 24 ), and wherein the control pod ( 25 ) is held during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ) via a tether ( 15 ) on a ground-based attachment point ( 16 , 44 ), wherein a sail surface of the kite ( 14 ) is spanned by a first kite part ( 40 ) and a second kite part ( 41 ), and wherein a connection which exists in the sail surface between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ) is separated such that the kite ( 14 ) assumes a different aerodynamic state and falls to the ground with the control pod ( 25 ) wherein the kite ( 14 ) has a predetermined separation point which forms the connection between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ), the predetermined separation point is secured by a securing device ( 37 ) during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ), and the predetermined separation point separates under the influence of aerodynamic forces occurring during normal operation of the kite system after the securing device is released.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sail surface comprises an inner surface ( 33 ) facing the control pod and an outer surface ( 32 ) facing away from the control pod, wherein the inner surface ( 33 ) and the outer surface ( 32 ) are spaced apart from each other and span an airfoil.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ) are completely separated from each other such that, after the separation, there is no longer any connection within the sail surface between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ).

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the separation of the connection is triggered by a trigger element ( 42 ).

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the trigger element ( 42 ) is triggered by a control signal from a control unit ( 20 ).

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein, after the triggering of the trigger element ( 42 ), the kite ( 14 ) assumes an aerodynamic state in which the forces acting over the connection are higher than during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ).

7 . The method of claim 4 , wherein lines ( 26 , 27 , 28 ) of the line system ( 24 ) are severed by the triggering of the trigger element ( 42 ).

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined separation point comprises a zip ( 36 ) by means of which the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ) are connected to each other during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ).

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the predetermined separation point is a zip ( 36 ) having teeth designed such that a number of teeth are missing or do not engage in a region in which the securing device ( 37 ) is arranged.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein, by separating the connection between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ), an opening through which an elevated pressure present inside the kite ( 14 ) escapes can be created in an outer skin ( 35 ) of the kite ( 14 ).

11 . A kite system ( 23 ), comprising a kite ( 14 ) and a control pod ( 25 ), wherein the kite ( 14 ) is held on the control pod ( 25 ) via a line system ( 24 ), wherein a sail surface of the kite ( 14 ) is spanned by a first kite part ( 40 ) and a second kite part ( 41 ), and wherein a connection between the first kite part ( 40 ) and the second kite part ( 41 ) is formed in the sail surface, wherein the connection includes a predetermined separation point secured by a securing device during normal operation of the kite system, and after release of the securing device, the predetermined separation point separates under the influence of aerodynamic forces acting on the first and second kite parts ( 40 , 41 ) during normal operation of the kite system, said kite system ( 23 ) further comprising a trigger element ( 42 ) for separating the connection such that, after separating the connection, the kite ( 14 ) assumes a different aerodynamic state and falls to the ground with the control pod ( 25 ).

12 . The kite system of claim 11 , wherein the control pod ( 25 ) is held on a ground-based attachment point ( 16 , 44 ) during normal operation of the kite system ( 23 ) via a tether ( 15 ).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT BY AFFIDAVIT Recorded Jun 12, 2025
From: ALVES, BENJAMIN
To: SKYSAILS POWER GMBH
Reel/Frame 072234/0085 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22159173 · Feb 28, 2022 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250171140A1 · May 29, 2025
References Cited (14)
US 3534931A · Rogallo · 1970 [cited by examiner]
US 4065079A · Winchurch · 1977 [cited by examiner]
US 6845948B2 · Thomas · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 7287481B1 · Wrage et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8963362B2 · Sia · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9908609B1 · Fourie · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10336412B2 · Morris · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11338896B2 · MacCallum · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11780552B2 · MacCallum · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20070157868A1 · Wrage · 2007 [cited by examiner]
CN 207550464U · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 202011107010U1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 3456630A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2023/054290 filed Feb. 21, 2023; Date of Mailing: May 8, 2023; 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]