IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,616,852
Granted Patent B2
US 12,616,852 · App. 18/851,085 · Granted May 5, 2026

Methods and system related to radiotherapy treatment planning

Inventors: Rasmus Helander (Johanneshov, SE); Mats Holmstrom (Varmdo, SE)
Assignee: Raysearch Laboratories AB
A61N5/1031A61N5/1045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,616,852
App. No.
18/851,085
Granted
May 5, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates to the use of machine learning for determining initial machine setting parameters for radiotherapy treatment planning. A machine-learning system is trained on data sets including a dose distribution and a set of machine parameter settings resulting from that dose distribution. The trained system can be used for determining machine parameter settings based on a desired dose distribution, which may be used as initial machine parameter settings for radiation treatment optimization.

Claims (20)

1 . A computer-based method, executed on a radiotherapy treatment planning system, comprising:

inputting to a machine learning system a plurality of historical data sets, each data set including a dose distributions and a corresponding set of machine parameter settings used to deliver the dose distributions;

training the machine learning system, based on the historical data sets, to generate machine parameter settings from a reference dose distribution, wherein the machine parameter settings correspond to initialization values used by a radiotherapy treatment plan optimization algorithm;

generating, using the trained machine learning system, an initial set of machine parameter settings from a reference dose distribution associated with a patient, the initial set being directly usable as initialization values for the radiotherapy treatment plan optimization algorithm;

automatically initializing, using the generated initial machine parameter settings, a radiotherapy treatment plan optimization algorithm that simulates radiation beam paths using the initialization values and adjusts machine parameters to satisfy patient-specific dosimetric objectives and constraints; and

outputting the optimized radiotherapy treatment plan, including the adjusted machine parameter settings, in a format executable by a radiotherapy apparatus to deliver the prescribed dose distribution to the patient.

2 . A machine learning system which has been trained according to claim 1 , the machine learning system being arranged to take input data in the form of one or more desired reference dose distributions and output a set of machine parameter settings including at least one machine parameter setting that is suitable for producing the one or more desired reference dose distribution by the radiotherapy delivery apparatus.

3 . A computer-based method for determining machine parameter settings for a radiotherapy delivery apparatus, using a machine learning system according to claim 2 , the method comprising:

inputting one or more reference dose distributions into the machine learning system;

initializing parameters, by the machine learning system; and

outputting, from the machine learning system, a set of machine parameter settings for the radiotherapy delivery apparatus.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the set of machine parameter settings includes Multi Leaf Collimator leaf settings.

5 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the set of machine parameter settings includes Monitor Unit settings.

6 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the set of machine parameter settings includes one or more of spot placement, spot weights and beam energy.

7 . A method for computer-based radiotherapy treatment plan optimization method including, before performing the plan optimization, performing the method of determining machine parameter settings according to claim 3 and using the resulting at least one machine parameter setting as an initial setting for that machine parameter in the radiotherapy treatment plan optimization.

8 . The method of claim 7 , wherein the plan optimization is performed by optimizing an optimization problem.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the plan optimization is performed by dose mimicking.

10 . A computer program product comprising computer-readable code means which, when run in a computer will cause the computer to perform the method of claim 1 .

11 . A computer program product comprising non-transitory storage means having stored thereon computer-readable code means which, when run in a computer will cause the computer to perform the method of claim 1 .

12 . A computer system comprising a processor and a program memory, the program memory having stored thereon a computer program product according to claim 10 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 26, 2024
From: HELANDER, RASMUS, MR.; HOLMSTROM, MATS, MR.
To: RAYSEARCH LABORATORIES AB (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 068701/0931 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 22166799 · Apr 5, 2022 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20250108233A1 · Apr 3, 2025
References Cited (34)
US 11011264B2 · Zankowski · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11020615B2 · Eriksson · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11167152B2 · Liu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20050143965A1 · Failla · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20110153547A1 · McNutt · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140350863A1 · Hartman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150095043A1 · Cordero Marcos · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160129282A1 · Yin · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160140300A1 · Purdie · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170177812A1 · Sjõlund · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170304651A1 · Takayanagi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180063386A1 · Sharma · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180304097A1 · Bokrantz · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190030370A1 · Hibbard · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190192880A1 · Hibbard · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190333623A1 · Hibbard · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200043573A1 · Fält · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200188692A1 · Liu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200360728A1 · Tilly · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210035340A1 · Wang · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210339046A1 · Lachaine · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220054859A1 · Liu · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220088410A1 · Hibbard · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 109843377A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110944717A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 113891742A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
KR 1020200116766A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019023142A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020256750A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2024, European Patent Office, Rijswijk, Netherlands. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report dated Sep. 19, 2022, European Patent Office, Munich, Germany. [cited by applicant]
Offie Action dated Feb. 22, 2025 in corresponding Chinese application No. CN110944717A, Chinese Patent Office, Beijing, China. [cited by applicant]
Fan et al. “Verification of the machine delivery parameters of a treatment plan via deep learning”. Phys Med Biol. 65 (19): 195007.doi:10.1088/1361-6560/aba165. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Apr. 9, 2025 in corresponding Japanese application No. 2024-552403, Japanese Patent Office, Tokyo, Japan. [cited by applicant]