IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,675,827
Granted Patent B2
US 12,675,827 · App. 18/882,071 · Granted Jul 7, 2026

Blockchain subrogation claims with arbitration

Inventors: Shawn M. Call (Bloomington, IL); Jaime Skaggs (Chenoa, IL); Eric Bellas (Bloomington, IL); Douglas A. Graff (Mountain View, MO); William J. Leise (Normal, IL); Vicki King (Bloomington, IL); Jacob J. Alt (Downs, IL); Eric R. Moore (Heyworth, IL); Stacie A. McCullough (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G06Q40/08G06Q20/0655G06Q2220/00H04L9/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,675,827
App. No.
18/882,071
Filed
Sep 11, 2024
Granted
Jul 7, 2026
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3693
USPC
705/75
Abstract

A shared ledger operated by a group of network participants according to a set of consensus rules manages and resolves subrogation claims between a clamant and a defendant with arbitration. Evidence regarding the value of the subrogation claim is sent to the shared ledger by the parties to the subrogation claim, such as sending data to a smart contract deployed on the shared ledger. The parties to the claim may request arbitration, especially after attempts to settle the claim on-chain between the two parties have failed. An arbitrator may request evidence from the parties and/or request responses from the parties to accept damages calculations and/or settlement offers. Once the claim is resolved, the arbitrator may release funds on the chain to the prevailing party or may accept confirmation that any payments have been made between the parties off-chain.

Claims (33)

1 . A validating network node on a shared ledger network for validating subrogation claim transactions comprising:

a transceiver configured to exchange shared ledger data with peer network nodes, the shared ledger data including subrogation claim transactions including demands for arbitration;

a storage media configured to store a copy of a shared ledger; and

one or more processors configured to:

apply a set of consensus rules to the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes;

append the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes to the copy of the shared ledger if the shared ledger data satisfies the consensus rules; and

execute a subrogation smart contract associated with a subrogation claim including a demand for arbitration of the subrogation claim, wherein the arbitration demand includes an identity of an arbitrator, the subrogation claim smart contract including a contract state and configured to obtain cryptographically signed evidence from participating entities, determine the cryptographically signed evidence is submitted by one of a plurality of predetermined participating entities, and determine that a transaction by the identified arbitrator includes a proof-of-identity to cryptographically prove that the transaction is submitted by the identified arbitrator.

2 . The validating network node of claim 1 , wherein the storage media is further configured to store a copy of a state database of the shared ledger.

3 . The validating network node of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

update a state of the subrogation smart contract.

4 . The validating network node of claim 3 , wherein the update to the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes evidence of an insured loss and a proof-of-identity to cryptographically prove that the update is originated by a participating entity.

5 . The validating network node of claim 3 , wherein the subrogation smart contract further includes a subrogation defendant and a subrogation claimant.

6 . The validating network node of claim 5 , wherein the update to the state of the subrogation claim smart contract indicates that the subrogation defendant has accepted a settlement amount in response to the subrogation defendant providing an indication of acceptance of the settlement amount.

7 . The validating network node of claim 5 , wherein the update to the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes a response to a request to accept a damages calculation from the arbitrator.

8 . The validating network node of claim 5 , wherein the update to the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes medical evidence to prove an injury to the subrogation claimant.

9 . The validating network node of claim 5 , wherein the update to the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes a settlement offer from the subrogation defendant.

10 . The validating network node of claim 1 , wherein the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes includes a cryptographic hash value configured to validate off-chain evidence of an insured loss.

11 . A computer-implemented method for validating subrogation claim transactions in a shared ledger network, the computer-implemented method comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors in a validating network node, shared ledger data from peer network nodes, the shared ledger data including subrogation claim transactions including demands for arbitration;

applying, by the one or more processors, a set of consensus rules to the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes;

appending, by the one or more processors, the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes to a copy of a shared ledger if the shared ledger data satisfies the consensus rules; and

executing, by the one or more processors, a subrogation smart contract associated with a subrogation claim including a demand for arbitration of the subrogation claim, wherein the arbitration demand includes an identity of an arbitrator, the subrogation claim smart contract including a contract state and configured to obtain cryptographically signed evidence from participating entities, determine the cryptographically signed evidence is submitted by one of a plurality of predetermined participating entities, and determine that a transaction by the identified arbitrator includes a proof-of-identity to cryptographically prove that the transaction is submitted by the identified arbitrator.

12 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:

storing, by the one or more processors, a copy of a state database of the shared ledger.

13 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:

updating, by the one or more processors, a state of the subrogation smart contract.

14 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein updating the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes updating, by the one or more processors, the state of the subrogation claim smart contract with evidence of an insured loss and a proof-of-identity to cryptographically prove that the update is originated by a participating entity.

15 . The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the subrogation smart contract further includes a subrogation defendant and a subrogation claimant.

16 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein updating the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes updating, by the one or more processors, the state of the subrogation claim smart contract with an indication that the subrogation defendant has accepted a settlement amount in response to the subrogation defendant providing an indication of acceptance of the settlement amount.

17 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein updating the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes updating, by the one or more processors, the state of the subrogation claim smart contract with a response to a request to accept a damages calculation from the arbitrator.

18 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein updating the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes updating, by the one or more processors, the state of the subrogation claim smart contract with medical evidence to prove an injury to the subrogation claimant.

19 . The computer-implemented method of claim 15 , wherein updating the state of the subrogation claim smart contract includes updating, by the one or more processors, the state of the subrogation claim smart contract with a settlement offer from the subrogation defendant.

20 . The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the shared ledger data received from the peer network nodes includes a cryptographic hash value configured to validate off-chain evidence of an insured loss.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 19, 2024
From: CALL, SHAWN M.; SKAGGS, JAIME; BELLAS, ERIC; GRAFF, DOUGLAS A.; LEISE, WILLIAM J.; KING, VICKI; ALT, JACOB J.; MOORE, ERIC R.; MCCULLOUGH, STACIE A.
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 068632/0616 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation 18206899 · Jun 7, 2023
Continuation 17583497 · Jan 25, 2022
Continuation 15955180 · Apr 17, 2018
Provisional Application 62584424 · Nov 10, 2017
Provisional Application 62584364 · Nov 10, 2017
Provisional Application 62584435 · Nov 10, 2017
Provisional Application 62555177 · Sep 7, 2017
Provisional Application 62555174 · Sep 7, 2017
Provisional Application 62555002 · Sep 6, 2017
Provisional Application 62555014 · Sep 6, 2017
Provisional Application 62510664 · May 24, 2017
Related Publication 20250005679A1 · Jan 2, 2025
References Cited (136)
US 7739133B1 · Hail et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7962385B2 · Falk et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8706586B2 · Rojewski et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8781863B2 · Hogan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8799034B1 · Brandmaier et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9508200B1 · Mullen et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10454878B2 · Khan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10521780B1 · Hopkins, III et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10586062B1 · Rangan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10606669B2 · Jacobs et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10796393B2 · Messerges et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10805085B1 · Liang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10812255B2 · Li · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10824759B1 · Magerkurth et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10833843B1 · Vijayvergia et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10872381B1 · Leise et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10878512B1 · Al-Zoubi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10891694B1 · Leise et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10949926B1 · Call et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10963966B1 · Brandmaier et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11100477B1 · Kemper et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11270383B1 · Call et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20030028404A1 · Herron et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20050086180A1 · Wamsley et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060089895A1 · Joye et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060116914A1 · Stemple · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070185743A1 · Jinks · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080071664A1 · Silverman et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080235064A1 · Gulko et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080243556A1 · Hogan et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20110178906A1 · Joye et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110320226A1 · Graziano et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120136780A1 · El-Awady et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239417A1 · Pourfallah et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130304517A1 · Florence · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140108057A1 · Daniels et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140229206A1 · Rojewski et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140379361A1 · Mahadkar et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150046188A1 · De La Garza · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160125386A1 · Desai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160125546A1 · Bostic · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160217258A1 · Pitroda et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160253663A1 · Clark et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160292672A1 · Fay et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170161827A1 · Imrey et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170186057A1 · Metnick · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170232300A1 · Tran et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170243212A1 · Castinado et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170308893A1 · Saraniecki · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170352012A1 · Hearn · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170372432A1 · McKown · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025334A1 · Pourfallah et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180025442A1 · Isaacson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180046992A1 · Hanrahan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180053257A1 · Nelemans · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180091316A1 · Stradling et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180117447A1 · Tran et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218343A1 · Kolb et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218455A1 · Kolb et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180365684A1 · Reilly et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190019186A1 · Falah et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190026821A1 · Bathen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190080325A1 · Pourfallah et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190102736A1 · Hudson · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190191284A1 · Tran et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190197620A1 · Jayaram et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190354966A1 · Himura et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392437A1 · Castagna et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190392438A1 · Rice · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200058071A1 · Yang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200065763A1 · Rosinzonsky et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200177373A1 · Komandur et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200226677A1 · Dhawan et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200250753A1 · Blount · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200272966A1 · Kirkegaard · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200279328A1 · Zhiri et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341971A1 · Krishnaswamy et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394321A1 · Ramos et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200394322A1 · Ramos et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200409937A1 · Wang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210065293A1 · Sigler et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210090037A1 · Dowding · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210174442A1 · Trudeau et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
AU 2009212995 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
AU 2009212995A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004044696 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004044696A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO20171577449 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2018106187A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018232493 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018232493A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046494 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2021046494A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Semenovich, in “Blockchain, smart contracts, and their potential insurance application,” in Actuaries Institute General Insurance Seminar, (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
“Blockchain”,Wikpedia, (2019). [cited by applicant]
“Managing Terrorism Financing Risk in Remittances and Money Transfers”, Testimony by John Cassara on Jul. 18, 2017, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
“The Blockchain Imperative: The Next Challenge for P&C Carriers” published in Cognizant, Nov. 2016, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
“The Blockchain Imperative: The Next Challenge for P&C Carriers”, published in Cognizant, Nov. 2016. [cited by applicant]
“The Hawala Alternative Remittance System and Its Role in Money Laundering”, by Jost and Sandhu, published in Jan. 2000, 27 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aru, “HashCoin uses Emercoin Blockchain for Vehicle Registration,” Dec. 8, 2016, <https://cointelegraph.com/news/hashcoin-uses-emercoin-blockchain-for-vehicle-registration-and-tracking>. [cited by applicant]
Chichester, Wide Open Spaces: How Blockchains Have Moved Beyond Currency, The Computer & Internet Lawyer (Aug. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Dizman, Beyond cryptocurrency: the role of blockchain in the future. ERP and Blockchain Integration, Thesis, Centria University of Applied Sciences, Bachelor of Business Administration, Business Management (Sep. 2021). [cited by applicant]
Hassan et al., Secured Insurance Framework Using Blockchain and Smart Contract, Scientific Programming, vol. 2021, Article ID 6787406, 11 pages (2021). [cited by applicant]
PWC, “Blockchain in the Insurance Sector,” Dec. 22, 2016, <https://www.the-digital-insurer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/795-blockchain-in-insurance.pdf>. [cited by applicant]
Report of the US Secretary of Tresury to US Congress, Nov. 2002, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
Report to US Congess submitted by US Tresury Secretray, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, on Dec. 31, 2002, 40 pages. [cited by applicant]
Semenovich, Blockchain, smart contracts and their potential insurance applications, Actuaries Institute, General Insurance Seminar, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Thompson, “Misplaced Blame: Islam, Terrorism and the Origins of Hawala”, published in 2007, Max Planck UN Year Book vol. 11, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Call et al., “Blockchain Subrogation Claims With Arbitration”, filed Apr. 17, 2018. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Final Office Action, dated May 21, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Final Office Action, dated Sep. 22, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Jan. 30, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Nonfinal Office Action, mailed Feb. 10, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,180, Notice of Allowance, dated Dec. 27, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,213, Call et al., “Fault Determination of Blockchain Subrogation Claims”, filed Apr. 17, 2018. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,213, Final Office Action, dated Jun. 1, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,213, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Nov. 25, 2019. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,213, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Oct. 14, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/955,213, Notice of Allowance, dated Jan. 8, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,980, Final Office Action, dated Aug. 19, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,980, Final Office Action, dated Jul. 13, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,980, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Feb. 3, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,980, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Mar. 2, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/972,980, Skaggs et al., “Blockchain Subrogation Payments”, filed May 7, 2018. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/168,024, Nonfinal Office Action, dated May 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/168,024, Notice of Allowance, dated Aug. 19, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/238,546, Final Office Action, dated Mar. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/238,546, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Nov. 19, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Yuan et al., Toward biochain based intelligent transportation systems, 2016 IEEE Conference, Nov. 2016. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/583,497, Nonfinal Office Action, dated Sep. 9, 2022. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/583,497, NonFinal Office Action, dated Feb. 9, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/238,546 dated Mar. 23, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/238,546 dated Nov. 19, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/963,293, NonFinal Office Action, dated May 11, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 18/238,765 dated May 9, 2024. [cited by applicant]
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 18/206,899, filed Feb. 7, 2024. [cited by applicant]