IP Library Granted Patent US 12,490,694
Granted Patent B2
US 12,490,694 · App. 18/902,493 · Granted Dec 9, 2025

Systems and methods of irrigation need assessment

Inventor: James Andrew Hill (Garden City, ID)
Assignee: HydroPoint Data Systems, Inc.
A01G25/167
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,490,694
App. No.
18/902,493
Granted
Dec 9, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An irrigation needs assessment system and method used to determine irrigation needs of one or more participants. The irrigation needs assessment system determines irrigation needs based on weather conditions, forecast weather conditions, plant water uptake, and ground moisture content information. Evaporation rate information is also provided from one or more other participants of the irrigation needs assessment service.

Claims (31)

1 . A system for adaptive irrigation control, comprising:

an on-site ground moisture content sensor configured to collect soil moisture data from a first region within an irrigation site;

an irrigation needs assessment service (INAS) server configured to:

receive off-site environmental data, including regional evapotranspiration rates;

aggregate the soil moisture data and the off-site environmental data; and

determine, based on the aggregated data, soil moisture conditions for a second region within the irrigation site that lacks a ground moisture content sensor; and

an irrigation controller configured to adjust irrigation schedules for the second region based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

2 . The system of claim 1 , in which the off-site environmental data includes precipitation probabilities.

3 . The system of claim 1 , in which the off-site environmental data includes temperature forecasts.

4 . The system of claim 1 , in which the determination for the second region accounts for differences in soil type or topography between the first and second regions.

5 . The system of claim 1 , in which the irrigation controller calculates irrigation discharge rates for the second region based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

6 . The system of claim 1 , in which the INAS server dynamically updates the determination for the second region as new soil moisture or environmental data is received.

7 . The system of claim 1 , in which the INAS server communicates with a weather service via a network connection to update environmental data in real time.

8 . The system of claim 1 , in which a user interface is configured to display region-specific irrigation recommendations for manual approval, and the irrigation controller is configured to implement schedules based on approved recommendations.

9 . The system of claim 1 , in which the aggregation of soil moisture data includes excluding anomalous sensor readings based on a validation process.

10 . The system of claim 1 , in which the second region includes distinct areas, and the irrigation controller adjusts schedules for each area based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

11 . A method for adaptive irrigation control, comprising:

collecting soil moisture data from a first region within an irrigation site using an on-site ground moisture content sensor;

receiving off-site environmental data, including regional evapotranspiration rates, at an irrigation needs assessment service (INAS) server;

aggregating the soil moisture data and the off-site environmental data;

determining, based on the aggregated data, soil moisture conditions for a second region within the irrigation site that lacks a ground moisture content sensor; and

adjusting irrigation schedules for the second region based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

12 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving precipitation probabilities as part of the off-site environmental data.

13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising receiving temperature forecasts as part of the off-site environmental data.

14 . The method of claim 11 , in which the determination for the second region accounts for differences in soil type or topography between the first and second regions.

15 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising calculating irrigation discharge rates for the second region based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

16 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising dynamically updating the determination for the second region as new soil moisture or environmental data is received.

17 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising communicating with a weather service via a network connection to update the off-site environmental data in real time.

18 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising displaying region-specific irrigation recommendations on a user interface for manual approval and implementing irrigation schedules based on approved recommendations.

19 . The method of claim 11 , in which the aggregation of soil moisture data includes excluding anomalous sensor readings based on a validation process.

20 . The method of claim 11 , in which the second region includes distinct areas, and further comprising adjusting irrigation schedules for each area based on the determined soil moisture conditions.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2026
From: HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
To: AVIDBANK
Reel/Frame 074290/0706 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2025
From: HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
To: MONTAGE CAPITAL II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 072121/0918 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 4, 2025
From: BASELINE, INC.
To: HYDROPOINT DATA SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 070104/0894 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 30, 2024
From: HILL, JAMES ANDREW
To: BASELINE, INC.
Reel/Frame 068745/0300 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 18314016 · May 8, 2023
Continuation 17011591 · Sep 3, 2020
Provisional Application 62895550 · Sep 4, 2019
Related Publication 20250113789A1 · Apr 10, 2025
References Cited (23)
US 7789321B2 · Hitt · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 8538592B2 · Alexanian · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8606415B1 · Woytowitz · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8660705B2 · Woytowitz · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 8712592B2 · Carlson et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8793024B1 · Woytowitz · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 10602682B1 · Wardle · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10743483B1 · Melrose · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 10955402B2 · Basheer · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20050211791A1 · Clark · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050216130A1 · Clark · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20090216345A1 · Christfort · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100094472A1 · Woytowitz · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110093123A1 · Alexanian · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140343737A1 · Nguyen · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150272017A1 · Hedley et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20190110415A1 · Walker · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190124858A1 · Sarver · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20210059136A1 · Hill · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013042113A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017133625A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2019033158A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021046210A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]