IP Library Granted Patent US 12,632,803
Granted Patent B2
US 12,632,803 · App. 18/913,197 · Granted May 19, 2026

Vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft noise signature mitigation

Inventor: Ian Villa (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: JOBY AERO, INC.
G06Q10/047B64C29/00B64C29/0016G01C21/20G01C21/3461G06Q10/06315G08G5/26G08G5/30G08G5/32G08G5/34G08G5/56B64C29/0025B64C29/0033B64C2220/00G05D1/654G05D2109/23G10K2210/1281G10K2210/3016G10K2210/30231
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,632,803
App. No.
18/913,197
Granted
May 19, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

Vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft can provide opportunities to incorporate aerial transportation into transportation networks for cities and metropolitan areas. However, VTOL aircraft may be noisy. To accommodate this, the aircraft may utilize onboard sensors, offboard sensing, network, and predictive temporal data for noise signature mitigation. By building a composite understanding of real data offboard the aircraft, the aircraft can make adjustments to the way it is flying and verify this against a predicted noise signature (via computational methods) to reduce environmental impact. This might be realized via a change in translative speed, propeller speed, or choices in propulsor usage (e.g., a quiet propulsor vs. a high thrust, noisier propulsor). These noise mitigation actions may also be decided at the network level rather than the vehicle level to balance concerns across a city and relieve computing constraints on the aircraft.

Claims (41)

1 . A computer-implemented method comprising:

accessing data indicative of noise signatures of respective aircraft of a fleet of aircraft and noise data indicative of a noise level within an environment, wherein:

the noise signatures are indicative of a predicted noise impact of the respective aircraft along respective routes of a plurality of routes, and

the noise data is obtained via one or more sensors associated with the respective routes of the plurality of routes;

based on the noise signatures of respective aircraft of the fleet of aircraft and the noise data, computing a changed route for a first aircraft; and

transmitting, over a network to a computing device associated with the first aircraft, a message with instructions to travel according to the changed route.

2 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises computing the changed route for the first aircraft based on: (i) a noise signature of a second aircraft within the fleet of aircraft and (ii) the noise data.

3 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises processing the noise data to the noise signatures to detect a change.

4 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises modifying a route assignment of the first aircraft prior to take-off.

5 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises computing a flight delay for the first aircraft.

6 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the noise data is obtained at one or more vertiport locations along the respective routes of the plurality of routes.

7 . The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the noise level within the environment is the noise level at the one or more vertiport locations.

8 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

based on the data indicative of the noise signatures and the noise data, computing a change in a noise signature of the first aircraft; and

transmitting a message to the first aircraft with instructions to modify operations of the first aircraft based on the change in the noise signature of the first aircraft.

9 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the noise data comprises ambient noise levels in the environment.

10 . The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the computing the changed route comprises modifying in-flight, a current route for the first aircraft.

11 . A computing system comprising:

one or more processors; and

one or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that are executable by the one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

accessing data indicative of noise signatures of respective aircraft of a fleet of aircraft and noise data indicative of a noise level within an environment, wherein:

the noise signatures are indicative of a predicted noise impact of the respective aircraft along respective routes of a plurality of routes, and

the noise data is obtained via one or more sensors associated with the respective routes of the plurality of routes;

based on the noise signatures of respective aircraft of the fleet of aircraft and the noise data, computing a changed route for a first aircraft; and

transmitting, over a network to a computing device associated with the first aircraft, a message with instructions to travel according to the changed route.

12 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises computing the changed route for the first aircraft based on: (i) a noise signature of a second aircraft within the fleet of aircraft and (ii) the noise data.

13 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the operations computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises processing the noise data to the noise signatures to detect a change.

14 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the operations computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises modifying a route assignment of the first aircraft prior to take-off.

15 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the operations computing the changed route for the first aircraft comprises computing a flight delay for the first aircraft.

16 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the noise data is obtained at one or more vertiport locations along the respective routes of the plurality of routes.

17 . The computing system of claim 16 , within the environment is the noise level at the one or more vertiport locations.

18 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise:

based on the data indicative of the noise signatures and the noise data, computing a change in a noise signature of the first aircraft; and

transmitting a message to the first aircraft with instructions to modify operations of the first aircraft based on the change in the noise signature of the first aircraft.

19 . The computing system of claim 11 , wherein the noise data comprises ambient noise levels in the environment.

20 . One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing instructions that are executable by one or more processors to cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the operations comprising:

accessing data indicative of noise signatures of respective aircraft of a fleet of aircraft and noise data indicative of a noise level within an environment, wherein:

the noise signatures are indicative of a predicted noise impact of the respective aircraft along respective routes of a plurality of routes, and

the noise data is obtained via one or more sensors associated with the respective routes of the plurality of routes;

based on the noise signatures of respective aircraft of the fleet of aircraft and the noise data, computing a changed route for a first aircraft; and

transmitting, over a network to a computing device associated with the first aircraft, a message with instructions to travel according to the changed route.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: UBER ELEVATE, LNC.
Reel/Frame 073229/0081 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Dec 16, 2025
From: UBER ELEVATE, INC.
To: JOBY ELEVATE, INC.
Reel/Frame 073997/0133 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 26, 2025
From: JOBY ELEVATE, INC.
To: JOBY AERO, INC.
Reel/Frame 073040/0852 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 15, 2025
From: VILLA, IAN
To: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 072574/0631 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 18324610 · May 26, 2023
Continuation 17216070 · Mar 29, 2021
Continuation 16276425 · Feb 14, 2019
Provisional Application 62668745 · May 8, 2018
Provisional Application 62668176 · May 7, 2018
Related Publication 20250046196A1 · Feb 6, 2025
References Cited (80)
US 3035789A · Young · 1962 [cited by applicant]
US 4022405A · Peterson · 1977 [cited by applicant]
US 5823468A · Bothe · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5839691A · Lariviere · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5842667A · Jones · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 6343127B1 · Billoud · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6892980B2 · Kawai · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 8016226B1 · Wood · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8020804B2 · Yoeli · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8311686B2 · Herkes et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8733690B2 · Bevirt et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8737634B2 · Brown et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8849479B2 · Walter · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9205930B2 · Yanagawa · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9387928B1 · Gentry et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9415870B1 · Beckman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9422055B1 · Beckman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9435661B2 · Brenner et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9442496B1 · Beckman et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9550561B1 · Beckman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9663237B2 · Senkel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9694911B2 · Bevirt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9771157B2 · Gagne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9786961B2 · Dyer et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9802702B1 · Beckman et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9816529B2 · Grissom et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9838436B2 · Michaels · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10140873B2 · Adler et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10152894B2 · Adler et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10216190B2 · Bostick et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10249200B1 · Grenier et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10304344B2 · Moravek et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10330482B2 · Chen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10593215B2 · Villa · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10593217B2 · Shannon · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10752365B2 · Galzin · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10759537B2 · Moore et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10768201B2 · Luo et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10832581B2 · Westervelt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10836470B2 · Liu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10913528B1 · Moore et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10948910B2 · Taveira et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10960785B2 · Villanueva et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11130566B2 · Mikic et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11145211B2 · Goel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11238745B2 · Villa et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11295622B2 · Goel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20100079342A1 · Smith et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20140179535A1 · Stückl et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160311529A1 · Brotherton-Ratcliffe et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170197710A1 · Ma · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170357914A1 · Tulabandbula et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180018887A1 · Sharma et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180053425A1 · Adler et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180216988A1 · Nance · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180308366A1 · Goel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180354636A1 · Darnell et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190146508A1 · Dean et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190221127A1 · Shannon · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190316849A1 · Abrego et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200103922A1 · Nonami et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200182637A1 · Kumar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200388166A1 · Rostamzadeh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 0945841A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
EP 2698749A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
EP 3499634A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
JP 2010095246A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013086795A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018023556A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019089677A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020252024A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Jandl et al.; Prediction of noise exposure levels using simulated flight trajectories; IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2011 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Bennaceur et al., “Passenger-centric urban air mobility: Fairness trade-offs and operational efficiency”, Transportation Research: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jong, “Optimizing cost effectiveness and flexibility of air taxis: A case study for optimization of air taxi operations”, University of Twente, Master's thesis, 2007, 62 pages. [cited by applicant]
Miao et al., “Data-driven robust taxi dispatch under demand uncertainties”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 27, No. 1, 2017, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Miao et al., “Taxi dispatch with real-time sensing data in metropolitan areas: A receding horizon control approach”, In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Sixth International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems, 2015, 15 page… [cited by applicant]
Resa et al.; Applied Data Mining Approach in Ubiquitous World of Air Transportation; 2009 Fourth International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology; pp. 1219-1222 (Year: 2009) 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schmitz et al.; Reduction of VTOL Operational Noise through Flight Trajectory Management; Journal of Aircraft 10.7; pp. 385-394 (Year: 1973). [cited by applicant]
Uber, “Fast-forwarding to a future of on-demand urban air transportation”, 2016, 99 pages. [cited by applicant]
Uragun et al.; The noise reduction techniques for Unmanned Air Vehicles; 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) May 27-30, 2014. Orlando, FL, USA; pp. 800-807 (Year: 2014) 8 pages. [cited by applicant]