IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,748,827
Granted Patent B2
US 12,748,827 · App. 18/951,120 · Granted Sep 29, 2026

Dynamic evaluation of language model prompts for model selection and output validation and methods and systems of the same

Inventors: Payal Jain (London, GB); Tariq Husayn Maonah (London, GB); Mariusz Saternus (Cracow, PL); Daniel Lewandowski (Cracow, PL); Biraj Krushna Rath (London, GB); Stuart Murray (London, GB); Philip Davies (London, GB)
G06F21/31G06F21/6218G06F40/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,748,827
App. No.
18/951,120
Granted
Sep 29, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The systems and methods disclosed herein relate to a model validation platform that enables dynamic validation of a user's prompt for a large language model (LLM) in order to evaluate the validity of the prompt and the suitability of a large language model for processing the prompt. For example, the platform enables an estimation of the resource allocation associated with processing the prompt with a given LLM, as well as a modification of the prompt, prior to the processing the prompt with the selected LLM. The platform can further validate the output prior to transmitting the output to a server system for display to the user. By doing so, the platform enables dynamic evaluation of a request to execute an LLM, as well as evaluation of resulting outputs, for accuracy and efficiency improvements in data processing or software development pipelines.

Claims (103)

1 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions thereon, wherein the instructions when executed by at least one data processor of a system, cause the system to:

receive an output generation request comprising an input for generation of an output using a first artificial intelligence (AI) model;

provide the output generation request to a first input validation model to modify the input,

wherein modifying the input comprises:

determining that the input includes a forbidden token; and

generating the modified input by omitting the forbidden token;

determine a performance metric value associated with the output generation request,

wherein the performance metric value indicates a requirement for the output generation request;

compare the performance metric value of the output generation request with a first performance criterion associated with the first AI model of a plurality of AI models;

in response to determining that the performance metric value satisfies the first performance criterion, provide the modified input to the first AI model to generate the output; and

enable access to the output by a user.

2 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the system to:

determine a user identifier associated with the user;

determine, from a token database, a stored token associated with the user identifier;

compare the stored token and an authentication token associated with the output generation request; and

in response to determining that the stored token and the authentication token associated with the output generation request match, authenticate the user.

3 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the system to:

generate, based on the output generation request, an event record including (1) the performance metric value, (2) a user identifier associated with the user, and (3) the input; and

transmit, to a server system, the event record for storage in an event database.

4 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions for modifying the input cause the system to:

determine that the input includes a first alphanumeric token;

determine that one or more records in a sensitive token database include a representation of the first alphanumeric token; and

modify the input to include a second alphanumeric token in lieu of the first alphanumeric token,

wherein the sensitive token database does not include a record representing the second alphanumeric token.

5 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions for modifying the input cause the system to:

generate a trace token comprising a traceable alphanumeric token; and

generate the modified input to include the trace token.

6 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions for comparing the performance metric value with the first performance criterion cause the system to:

generate a cost metric value associated with the requirement for the output generation request;

determine a threshold cost associated with the first AI model; and

determine that the cost metric value satisfies the threshold cost.

7 . The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the instructions further cause the system to:

extract a code sample from the output, wherein the code sample includes code for a software routine;

compile, within a virtual machine of the system, the code sample to generate an executable program associated with the software routine;

execute, within the virtual machine, the software routine using the executable program;

detect an anomaly in the execution of the software routine;

in response to detecting the anomaly in the execution of the software routine, generate a validation indicator to include an indication of the anomaly; and

in response to generating the validation indicator, enable access to the output by the user.

8 . A system comprising:

at least one hardware processor; and

at least one non-transitory memory storing instructions, which, when executed by the at least one hardware processor, cause the system to:

receive an output generation request comprising an input for generation of an output using a first AI model;

provide the output generation request to a first input validation model to modify the input,

wherein modifying the input comprises:

generating a traceable token; and

generating the modified input to include the traceable token;

determine a performance metric value associated with the output generation request,

wherein the performance metric value indicates a requirement for the output generation request;

compare the performance metric value of the output generation request with a first performance criterion associated with the first AI model of a plurality of AI models;

in response to determining that the performance metric value satisfies the first performance criterion, provide the modified input to the first AI model to generate the output; and

enable access to the output by a user.

9 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further cause the system to:

determine a user identifier associated with the user;

determine, from a token database, a stored token associated with the user identifier;

compare the stored token and an authentication token associated with the output generation request; and

in response to determining that the stored token and the authentication token associated with the output generation request match, authenticate the user.

10 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions further cause the system to:

generate, based on the output generation request, an event record including (1) the performance metric value, (2) a user identifier associated with the user, and (3) the input; and

transmit, to a server system, the event record for storage in an event database.

11 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions for modifying the input cause the system to:

determine that the input includes a first alphanumeric token;

determine that one or more records in a sensitive token database include a representation of the first alphanumeric token; and

modify the input to include a second alphanumeric token in lieu of the first alphanumeric token,

wherein the sensitive token database does not include a record representing the second alphanumeric token.

12 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions for modifying the input cause the system to:

determine that the input includes a forbidden token; and

generate the modified input by omitting the forbidden token.

13 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions for comparing the performance metric value with the first performance criterion cause the system to:

generate a cost metric value associated with the requirement for the output generation request;

determine a threshold cost associated with the first AI model; and

determine that the cost metric value satisfies the threshold cost.

14 . The system of claim 8 , wherein the instructions for providing the output generation request to the first input validation model cause the system to:

identify an attribute of the output generation request;

determine, based on the attribute, the first input validation model of a plurality of prompt validation models; and

provide the output generation request to the first input validation model.

15 . A method comprising:

receiving an output generation request comprising an input for generation of an output using a first AI model of a plurality of AI models;

modifying, using a first input validation model, the output generation request by modifying the input to omit a set of forbidden tokens;

determining a performance metric value associated with the modified output generation request,

wherein the performance metric value indicates a requirement for the modified output generation request;

comparing the performance metric value of the modified output generation request with a first performance criterion associated with the first AI model; and

in response to determining that the performance metric value satisfies the first performance criterion, enabling access to the output by a user.

16 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising:

determining a user identifier associated with the user;

determining, from a token database, a stored token associated with the user identifier;

comparing the stored token and an authentication token associated with the output generation request; and

in response to determining that the stored token and the authentication token associated with the output generation request match, authenticating the user.

17 . The method of claim 15 , comprising:

generating, based on the output generation request, an event record including (1) the performance metric value, (2) a user identifier associated with the user, and (3) the input; and

transmitting, to a server system, the event record for storage in an event database.

18 . The method of claim 15 , comprising:

determining that the input includes a first alphanumeric token;

determining that one or more records in a sensitive token database include a representation of the first alphanumeric token; and

modifying the input to include a second alphanumeric token in lieu of the first alphanumeric token,

wherein the sensitive token database does not include a record representing the second alphanumeric token.

19 . The method of claim 15 , wherein comparing the performance metric value with the first performance criterion comprises:

generating a cost metric value associated with the requirement for the output generation request;

determining a threshold cost associated with the first AI model; and

determining that the cost metric value satisfies the threshold cost.

20 . The method of claim 15 , wherein providing the output generation request to the first input validation model comprises:

identifying an attribute of the output generation request;

determining, based on the attribute, the first input validation model of a plurality of prompt validation models; and

providing the output generation request to the first input validation model.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 18, 2024
From: JAIN, PAYAL; MAONAH, TARIQ HUSAYN; SATERNUS, MARIUSZ; LEWANDOWSKI, DANIEL; RATH, BIRAJ KRUSHNA; MURRAY, STUART; DAVIES, PHILIP
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 069310/0685 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 18633293 · Apr 11, 2024
Related Publication 20250322046A1 · Oct 16, 2025
References Cited (189)
US 5423041A · Burke et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5586218A · Allen · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5671361A · Brown et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 6169981B1 · Werbos · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6208720B1 · Curtis et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6473748B1 · Archer · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6546545B1 · Honarvar et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6587846B1 · Lamuth · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7313552B2 · Lorenz et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7669133B2 · Chikirivao et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7822621B1 · Chappel · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7984513B1 · Kyne et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8572552B2 · Kennaley · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8656343B2 · Fox et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8930298B2 · Demuth et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9020872B2 · Junker · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9215212B2 · Reddy et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9251466B2 · Rajesh · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9842045B2 · Heorhiadi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9858828B1 · Fuka · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10157355B2 · Johnson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10276170B2 · Gruber et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10438212B1 · Jilani et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10554738B1 · Ren · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10607141B2 · Jerram et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10755103B2 · Chang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10764150B1 · Hermoni et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10943067B1 · Brown et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10949337B1 · Yalla et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 10951485B1 · Hermoni et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11042647B1 · Joyce et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11074107B1 · Nandakumar · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11106801B1 · Levine et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11153177B1 · Hermoni et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11164078B2 · Jin et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11227047B1 · Vashisht et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11227187B1 · Weinberger · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11271822B1 · Hermoni et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11315196B1 · Narayan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11328068B1 · Niedzwiedz et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11436777B1 · Karli et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11470106B1 · Lin et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11481553B1 · Durvasula et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11503075B1 · Sirianni et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11516222B1 · Srinivasan et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11531943B1 · Kumar · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11562078B2 · Sabourin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11573848B2 · Linck · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11586436B1 · Jennings · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11593390B2 · Sundel · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11656852B2 · Mazurskiy · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11663409B2 · Terry et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11663662B2 · Chen et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11676685B2 · Jaganathan et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11681610B2 · Chang et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11709757B1 · Kurian et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11734591B2 · Turner et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11741226B2 · Dixit · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11750717B2 · Walsh · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11765100B1 · Sloane et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11803792B2 · Makhija et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11811730B1 · Kandasamy et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11823108B1 · Bradbury et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11842408B1 · Martinez et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11853735B1 · Choudhury et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11874934B1 · Rao et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11875123B1 · Ben David et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11875130B1 · Bosnjakovic et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11915152B2 · Baker · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11924027B1 · Mysore · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11947435B2 · Boulineau · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11960515B1 · Pallakonda et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 11983806B1 · Ramesh · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11990139B1 · Sandrew · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 11995412B1 · Mishra · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12001463B1 · Pallakonda et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12007963B1 · Rajagopalan et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12026599B1 · Lewis et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12028368B1 · Cohen et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12094010B1 · Hampapur et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12131819B1 · Murray et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12135949B1 · Cameron et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12149553B1 · Fly et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12149558B1 · Brown et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12155781B1 · Helfgott et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 12182258B2 · Stokes et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20170262164A1 · Jain et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170279826A1 · Mohanty et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180020021A1 · Gilmore et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200133711A1 · Webster et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200219009A1 · Dao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200233979A1 · Tahmasebi Maraghoosh et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200380118A1 · Miller et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200387608A1 · Miller et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210089941A1 · Chen et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210173935A1 · Ramasamy et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256125A1 · Miller et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220050928A1 · Shukla et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220114399A1 · Castiglione et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220179906A1 · Desai et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220198304A1 · Szczepanik et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220263843A1 · Aslam et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220263855A1 · Engelberg et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220263860A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220278889A1 · Malleshaiah et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220286474A1 · Kuppa et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220294789A1 · Tikhomirov et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220294810A1 · Tyagi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220303300A1 · Egan · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220303302A1 · Hwang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220303352A1 · Herzog et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220311681A1 · Palladino · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220318654A1 · Lin · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220327620A1 · Ndoutoumou · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220342846A1 · Kunchakarra et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220345457A1 · Jeffords et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220358023A1 · Moser et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220366140A1 · Saito et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220368728A1 · Murray et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220377093A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220400135A1 · Gamra · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414213A1 · Dixit · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220414536A1 · M L et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230007039A1 · Waplington · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230009999A1 · Higuchi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230044102A1 · Anderson et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230109021A1 · Curtin et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230148116A1 · Stokes et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230169397A1 · Smith et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230177441A1 · Durvasula et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230252393A1 · Orzechowski et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230269272A1 · Dambrot et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230274003A1 · Liu et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230359789A1 · Andre et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230362200A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230396641A1 · Hebbagodi et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230412635A1 · Binyamini et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240012734A1 · Lee et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240020538A1 · Socher et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240054233A1 · Ohayon et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240054249A1 · Loubet Moundi et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240095077A1 · Singh et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240129345A1 · Kassam · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20240202442A1 · Saito et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240256678A1 · Thompson · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240364749A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240403428A1 · Lal et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240403437A1 · Szigeti et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240403445A1 · Straub et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240406145A1 · Crabtree et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240411896A1 · Myers et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240414211A1 · Boyer et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 106502890A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2021160499A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022125803A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO 2024020416A1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Generative machine learning models; IPCCOM000272835D, Aug. 17, 2023. (Year: 2023). [cited by examiner]
Behravesh et al, “Rule Modeling Engine for Optimizing Complex Event Processing Patterns”, IEEE, pp. 128-135 (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]
Burnashev et al, “Design and Implementation of Integrated Development Environment for Building Rule-Based Expert Systems”, IEEE, pp. 1-4 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Cuadrado et al, “An Autonomous Engine for Services Configuration and Deployment”, IEEE, pp. 520-536 (Year: 2012). [cited by applicant]
Fickas, “Design Issues in a Rule-Based System”, ACM, pp. 208-215 (Year: 1985). [cited by applicant]
Ge et al, “Automatic Generation of Rule-based Software Configuration Management Systems”, ACM, pp. 659 (Year: 2005). [cited by applicant]
Genesis et al “CI Ref: A Tool for Visualizing the Historical Data of Software Refactorings in Java Projects”, ACM, pp. 174-179 (Year: 2023). [cited by applicant]
Guana et al, “Backward Propagation of Code Refinements on Transformational Code Generation Environments”, IEEE, pp. 55-60 (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
Halvonik et al, “Large Language Models and Rule-Based Approaches in Domain-Specific Communication”, IEEE, pp. 107046-107058 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Huang et al, “AI Coding: Learning to Construct Error Correction Codes”, IEEE, pp. 26-39 (Year: 2020). [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al, “Self-Planning Code Generation with Large Language Models”, ACM, pp. 1-30 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Kibria et al, “Big Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Artificial Intelligence in Next-Generation Wireless Networks”, IEEE, pp. 32328-32338 (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Kumar et al, “A Rule-based Recommendation System for Selection of Software Development Life Cycle Models”, ACM, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
Langley et al, “Applications of Machine Learning and Rule Induction”, ACM, pp. 54-64 (Year: 1995). [cited by applicant]
Idrizi “Exploring the Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Adaptive learning systems”, ACM, pp. 100-105 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Mezini, Programming and Execution Models for Next Generation Code Intelligence Systems (Keynote), ACM, pp. 1-2 (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Rattanasawad et al, “A Review and Comparison of Rule Languages and Rule-based Inference Engines for the Semantic Web”, IEEE, pp. 1-6 (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
Soares et al, “Explaining Deep Learning Models Through Rule-Based Approximation and Visualization”, IEEE, pp. 2399-2407 (Year: 2021). [cited by applicant]
Sottara et al., “Enhancing a Production Rule Engine with Predictive Models Using PMML”, ACM, pp. 39-47 (Year: 2011). [cited by applicant]
Sun et al, “Efficient Rule Engine for Smart Building Systems”, IEEE, pp. 1658-1669 (Year: 2015). [cited by applicant]
Vartak et al “MODELDB: A System for Machine Learning Model Management”, ACM, pp. 1-3 (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Vereschak et al, “Trust in AI-assisted Decision Making: Perspectives from Those Behind the System and Those for Whom the Decision is Made”, ACM, pp. 1-14 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Verma et al, “Integration of Rule based and Case based Reasoning System to Support Decision Making”, IEEE, pp. 106-108 (Year: 2014). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al, “Design and realization of distributed Rule Engine for scene linkage of Internet of Things”, IEEE, pp. 396-401 (Year: 2024). [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al, “Developing a Rule Engine for Automated Feature Recognition from CAD Models”, IEEE, pp. 3925-3930 (Year: 2009). [cited by applicant]
Guldimann, P., et al. “COMPL-AI Framework: A Technical Interpretation and LLM Benchmarking Suite for the EU Artificial Intelligence Act,” arXiv:2410.07959v1 [cs.CL] Oct. 10, 2024, 38 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion received in Application No. PCT/US24/47571, dated Dec. 9, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Empower Your Team with a Compliance Co-Pilot, Sedric, retrieved on Sep. 25, 2024. https://www.sedric.ai/. [cited by applicant]
Cranium, Adopt & Accelerate AI Safely, retrieved on Nov. 7, 2024, from https://cranium.ai/. [cited by applicant]
Hu, Q., J., et al., “Routerbench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing System,” arXiv:2403.12031v2 [cs.LG] Mar. 28, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Nauta, M., et al., “From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review of Evaluating Explainable AI” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55 No. 13s Article 295, 2023 [retrieved Jul. 3, 2024]. [cited by applicant]
Peers, M., “What California AI Bill Could Mean,” The Briefing, published and retrieved Aug. 30, 2024, 8 pages, https://www.theinformation.com/articles/what-california-ai-bill-could-mean. [cited by applicant]
Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Li, X., Jin, J., Qian, H., Liu, Z., Li, C., Dou, Z., Ho, T., & Yu, P. S. (2024). Trustworthiness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems: A Survey. ArXiv. /abs/2409.10102. [cited by applicant]