IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,545,401
Granted Patent B2
US 12,545,401 · App. 19/017,161 · Granted Feb 10, 2026

Systems and methods for propeller thrust protection

Inventors: Giovanni Droandi (San Jose, CA); Nathan Thomas Depenbusch (Mountain View, CA)
Assignee: Archer Aviation Inc.
B64C29/0033B64D31/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,545,401
App. No.
19/017,161
Granted
Feb 10, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure relates generally to flight control of electric aircraft and other powered aerial vehicles. In one embodiment, a method is disclosed, comprising: receiving a descent rate command from a pilot input device, determining a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and controlling the aircraft's descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate when at least one of the at least two propellers is within a first threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

Claims (58)

1 . A computer-implemented method for an aircraft, comprising:

receiving, using at least one hardware processor, a descent rate command from a pilot input device;

determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and

controlling, using the at least one hardware processor, an aircraft descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate when at least one of the at least two propellers is within a first threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

2 . The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is determined, using the at least one hardware processor, based on an airspeed of the aircraft and at least one of: a pitch angle of the aircraft or a tilt angle of the propeller.

3 . The method of claim 2 ,

wherein the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is determined, using the at least one hardware processor, based on at least one of: a thrust of the propeller, a torque of the propeller, a propeller speed, or a vibration of the propeller.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is determined, using the at least one hardware processor, based on an airspeed of the aircraft, a pitch angle of the aircraft, and a blade pitch of the propeller.

5 . The method of any of claim 1 , wherein the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is determined, using the at least one hardware processor, based on a thrust value.

6 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the thrust value is a thrust provided by the corresponding propeller while the aircraft is in a hover phase.

7 . The method of claim 5 , wherein the thrust value varies based on a type of the corresponding propeller.

8 . The method of claim 5 , wherein:

the at least two propellers include a lift propeller and a tilt propeller; and

the thrust value of the lift propeller is different from the thrust value of the tilt propeller.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state comprises determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a proximity of a state of the propeller to a multi-dimensional vortex ring state boundary.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the descent rate comprises:

determining, using at least one hardware processor, a maximum allowable descent rate;

inputting, using the at least one hardware processor, the maximum allowable descent rate and the descent rate command into a model which generates a descent rate command; and

controlling, using the at least one hardware processor, one or more of flight elements of the aircraft based on the generated descent rate command.

11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the descent rate comprises determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a maximum allowable descent rate based on at least one of: roll of the aircraft, pitch of the aircraft, or forward speed of the aircraft.

12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing, using the at least one hardware processor, a warning to the pilot based on at least one of the at least two propellers being within a second threshold proximity to the vortex ring state;

wherein the second threshold proximity is different from the first threshold proximity; and

wherein the warning includes at least one of: a displaying of text, a turning on of a light, a changing of a light color, an audible notification, or a haptic notification.

13 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the second threshold proximity is further from the vortex ring state than the first threshold proximity.

14 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling at least one of: propeller tilt angle, aircraft roll angle, aircraft pitch angle, or propeller speed based on at least one of the at least two propellers being within the threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting, using the at least one hardware processor, an airspeed of the aircraft, wherein the determining the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is performed upon determining, using the at least one hardware processor, the airspeed is below a threshold speed.

16 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting, using the at least one hardware processor, an airspeed of the aircraft, wherein the controlling the aircraft's descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate is performed upon determining, using the at least one hardware processor, the detected airspeed is less than a threshold.

17 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting, using the at least one hardware processor, whether the aircraft is receiving powered lift support, wherein the determining the proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state is performed, using the at least one hardware processor, upon detecting the aircraft is receiving powered lift support.

18 . The method of claim 1 , wherein controlling the descent rate comprises controlling, using the at least one hardware processor, the aircraft based on a determined maximum allowable descent rate.

19 . The method of claim 18 , further comprising detecting, using the at least one hardware processor, a vibration of at least one of the at least two propellers, wherein the maximum allowable descent rate is reduced based on the detected vibration exceeding a threshold vibration.

20 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the pilot input device is at least one inceptor device.

21 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, using the at least one hardware processor, at least one of the at least two propellers has entered a vortex ring state; and

controlling, using the at least one hardware processor, tilt angle of at least one of the at least two propellers based on the determination.

22 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, using the at least one hardware processor, an aircraft maneuver rate command from the pilot input device;

determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and

controlling, using the at least one hardware processor, an aircraft maneuver rate to be less than the commanded maneuver rate based on at least one of the at least two propellers being within a threshold proximity to the vortex ring state; and

wherein the maneuver rate is at least one of: yaw rate, roll rate, or pitch rate.

23 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a respective proximity of each propeller of the at least two propellers to the vortex ring state.

24 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a first proximity of a first propeller to the vortex ring state and a second proximity of a second propeller to the vortex ring state.

25 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, using the at least one hardware processor, a proximity of a propeller blade of each propeller of at least two propellers to the vortex ring state.

26 . A control system comprising at least one processor configured to execute instructions to cause the system to perform operations comprising:

receiving a descent rate command from a pilot input device;

determining a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and

controlling an aircraft descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate when at least one of the at least two propellers is within a first threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

27 . A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving a descent rate command from a pilot input device;

determining a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and

controlling an aircraft descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate when at least one of the at least two propellers is within a first threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

28 . An aircraft comprising at least one processor configured to execute instructions to perform operations comprising:

receiving a descent rate command from a pilot input device;

determining a proximity of each propeller of at least two propellers to a vortex ring state; and

controlling an aircraft descent rate to be less than the commanded descent rate when at least one of the at least two propellers is within a first threshold proximity to the vortex ring state.

29 . The aircraft of claim 28 , wherein the at least two propellers comprise at least one propeller positioned on the opposite side of a fuselage of the aircraft from another propeller.

30 . The aircraft of claim 28 , wherein the at least two propellers comprise at least four propellers.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2025
From: DROANDI, GIOVANNI; DEPENBUSCH, NATHAN THOMAS
To: ARCHER AVIATION INC.
Reel/Frame 071111/0590 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation PCTUS2024037414 · Jul 10, 2024
Provisional Application 63512784 · Jul 10, 2023
Related Publication 20250223032A1 · Jul 10, 2025
References Cited (36)
US 5001646A · Caldwell et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 8616492B2 · Oliver · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9037316B2 · Abildgaard et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9511880B2 · He et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9898033B1 · Long · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11454990B1 · List et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11554855B2 · Brand et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12164311B1 · Gandhi · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20020153452A1 · King et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20040093130A1 · Osder et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20060006279A1 · Kisor · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060008279A1 · Kisor · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20090089006A1 · Certain · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100076625A1 · Yoeli · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20130138270A1 · Christensen et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20180339791A1 · Quaranta · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190332125A1 · Irwin, III et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200333805A1 · English et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200393851A1 · Kim et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210097873A1 · Sassinsky · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210197962A1 · Brand · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220326704A1 · Moy et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 114613197A · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 3263452B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 399405981 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 3891067B1 · 2024 [cited by applicant]
WO 2020180373A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2022136981A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Walker, G., et al., “F-35B Integrated Flight-Propulsion Control Development”, 2013 international powered lift conference, 2013, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Vigano, L., et al., “Development of augmented control laws for a tilt rotor in low and high speed flight modes”, European Rotorcraft Forum, 2017, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Denham, J., et al., “Converging on a precision Hover control strategy for the F-35B STOVL aircraft.”, AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2008, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Whittle, R., “Flying The Osprey Is Not Dangerous, Just Different: Veteran Pilots”, Breaking Defense, Sep. 5, 2012, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kang, Y., et al., “Development of flight control system and troubleshooting on flight test of a tilt-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle”, International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 17.1, 2016, p. 120-131, 12 pa… [cited by applicant]
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion for application No. PCT/US2024/037414 mailed on Oct. 2, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “A Vortex-ring-state-avoiding Descending Control Strategy for Multi-rotor UAVs”, Proceedings of the 34th Chinese Conference, Jul. 28-30, 2015, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Talaeizadeh et al., “Quadcopter Fast Pure Descent Maneuver Avoiding Vortex Ring State Using Yaw-Rate Control Scheme”, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, No. 2, Apr. 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]