IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,400,267
Granted Patent B2
US 12,400,267 · App. 19/040,549 · Granted Aug 26, 2025

Transaction and settlement validation service

Inventors: Damien Patton (Plano, TX); Christian Gratton (Eaton Rapids, MI)
Assignee: TRETE Inc.
G06Q40/04G06F16/215G06F16/2358G06F16/2379G06F16/275G06Q20/363G06Q20/3674G06Q20/3829G06Q20/389G06Q20/401G06Q20/42G06Q30/0613G06Q40/06H04L9/50H04L67/1097G06F16/27G06Q2220/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,400,267
App. No.
19/040,549
Granted
Aug 26, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In certain aspects of the disclosure, a computer-implemented method includes receiving an initial order based on a user input. The method includes mapping out correct steps from the initial order to settlement. The method includes validating instructions at each step. The method includes recording data pertaining to permit the settlement of the transaction.

Claims (56)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

accessing transaction data at an Alternative Trading System (ATS), the transaction data defining a transaction requesting transfer of an asset between a first user and a second user of the ATS, the transaction associated with a transaction type including a sequence of transaction stages;

utilizing a computerized validation service outside of the ATS to independently validate appropriate completion of the transaction as well as each transaction stage in a transaction stage subset, the transaction stage subset including at least two transaction stages from among the sequence of transaction stages, including:

formulating a parallel transaction flow representing transaction stages of the transaction based on the transaction type; and

utilizing the parallel transaction flow precomputing intended transaction stage output for a transaction stage in the transaction stage subset based on rules of the ATS and the transaction data;

in parallel with utilizing the computerized validation service, detecting initiation of an actual transaction flow implementing the transaction at the ATS;

validating performance of the transaction stage concurrently with performance of the actual transaction flow at the ATS, including:

digitally intercepting actual output from the transaction stage of the actual transaction flow;

comparing the intercepted actual output against the precomputed intended transaction stage output;

gathering comparison results from the comparison; and

controlling further performance of the transaction at the ATS based on the comparison results.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein controlling further performance of the transaction comprises:

approving transaction progression to another transaction stage of the transaction based on the comparison results; and

electronically notifying the ATS of the approval.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein electronically notifying the ATS of the approval comprises sending an approval key to the ATS.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein digitally intercepting actual output comprises intercepting at least two of: a seller ID, a property ID, a buyer ID, a share ID, an amount of shares, and a value of shares.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein sending an approval key comprises sending an encrypted approval key.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein controlling further performance of the transaction comprises:

preventing progression to another transaction stage of the transaction based on the comparison results identifying a transaction error; and

electronically notifying the ATS of the error.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising:

receiving updated actual output of retrying the transaction stage from an artificial intelligence self-healing process subsequent to notifying the ATS of the error;

further comparing the updated actual output against the precomputed intended transaction stage output;

gathering further comparison results from the further comparison; and

approving transaction progression to the next transaction stage based on the further comparison results.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein gathering comparison results comprises detecting that the actual output matches the precomputed intended transaction stage output.

9. A system comprising;

a computerized alternative trading system (ATS);

a computerized validation service;

one or more processors; and

system memory coupled to the one or more processors and storing instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to:

access transaction data corresponding to a transaction requesting transfer of an asset between a first user and a second user of the ATS, the transaction associated with a transaction type including a sequence of transaction stages;

utilize the computerized validation service to independently validate appropriate completion of the transaction as well as each transaction stage in a transaction stage subset, the transaction stage subset including at least two transaction stages from among the sequence of transaction stages, including:

formulate a parallel transaction flow representing transaction stages of the transaction based on the transaction type; and

utilize the parallel transaction flow to precompute intended transaction stage output for a transaction stage in the transaction stage subset based on rules of the ATS and the transaction data;

in parallel with utilizing the computerized validation service, detect initiation of an actual transaction flow implementing the transaction at the ATS;

validate performance of the transaction stage concurrently with performance of the actual transaction flow at the ATS, including:

digitally intercept actual output from the transaction stage of the actual transaction flow;

compare the intercepted actual output against the precomputed intended transaction stage output;

gather comparison results from the comparison; and

control further performance of the transaction at the ATS based on the comparison results.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to control further performance of the transaction comprise instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to:

approve transaction progression to another transaction stage of the transaction based on the comparison results; and

electronically notify the ATS of the approval.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to electronically notify the ATS of the approval comprise instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to send an approval key to the ATS.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to digitally intercept actual output comprise instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to intercept at least two of: a seller ID, a property ID, a buyer ID, a share ID, an amount of shares, and a value of shares.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to send an approval key comprise instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to send an encrypted approval key.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to control further performance of the transaction comprise instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to:

prevent progression to another transaction stage of the transaction based on the comparison results identifying a transaction error; and

electronically notify the ATS.

15. The system of claim 14 , further comprising instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to:

receive updated actual output of retrying the transaction stage from an artificial intelligence self-healing process subsequent to notifying the ATS of the error;

further compare the updated actual output against the precomputed intended transaction stage output;

gather further comparison results from the further comparison; and

approve transaction progression to another transaction stage of the transaction based on the further comparison results.

16. The system of claim 9 , wherein the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to gather comparison results comprise the instructions configured to cause the one or more processors to detect that the actual output matches the precomputed intended transaction stage output.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 20, 2025
From: PATTON, DAMIEN; GRATTON, CHRISTIAN
To: TRETE INC.
Reel/Frame 070278/0103 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation 18616184 · Mar 26, 2024
Provisional Application 63615136 · Dec 27, 2023
Provisional Application 63615128 · Dec 27, 2023
Provisional Application 63615145 · Dec 27, 2023
Provisional Application 63615108 · Dec 27, 2023
Provisional Application 63600381 · Nov 17, 2023
Provisional Application 63596471 · Nov 6, 2023
Provisional Application 63515337 · Jul 24, 2023
Provisional Application 63509266 · Jun 20, 2023
Provisional Application 63509264 · Jun 20, 2023
Provisional Application 63509261 · Jun 20, 2023
Provisional Application 63509257 · Jun 20, 2023
Provisional Application 63454622 · Mar 24, 2023
Related Publication 20250173719A1 · May 29, 2025
References Cited (32)
US 10587628B2 · Setty · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11637691B2 · Venkataramappa · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20070027781A1 · Tripp · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20130117156A1 · Azmi · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20160275626A1 · Lee · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190278852A1 · Jayachandran · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200143372A1 · Liu · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220207509A1 · Hiura · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220222657A1 · Nichani · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220366494A1 · Cella · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220391896A1 · Lei · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230245112A1 · De Caro · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240046360A1 · Negron · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240177150A1 · Guo · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CA 3062805A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 3173084A1 · 2021 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019141984A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Tam, KC. “Transactions in Hyperledger Fabric.” Medium. Jul. 21, 2019. Retrieved from: <https://kctheservant.medium.com/transactions-in-hyperledger-fabric-50e068dda8a9> on Mar. 21, 2025. [cited by examiner]
HyperLedger Fabric Docs—Transactions. Retrieved from: <https://web.archive.org/web/20220501185900/https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-1.4/txflow.html> on Mar. 21, 2025. [cited by examiner]
Amoussou, Mandela, “What is a Cap Table, and Why are they Important?”, from Digital Securities, Published Jan. 10, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Politou, E. et al., “Blockchain Mutability: Challenges and Proposed Solutions”, from IEEE Transcations on Emerging Topics in Computing, Published Oct. 25, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,143, Mailing Date Aug. 8, 2024, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,143, Maling Date Oct. 17, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,165, Mailing Date Aug. 9, 2024, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,165, Mailing Date Sep. 16, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,173, Mailing Date May 24, 2024, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,173, Mailing Date Aug. 28, 2024, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,179, Mailing Date Jun. 4, 2024, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,179, Mailing Date Sep. 25, 2024, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,184, Mailing Date Jun. 7, 2024, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,184, Mailing Date Oct. 2, 2024, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/616,184, Mailing Date Jan. 6, 2025, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]