Latency management in an event driven gaming network
One exemplary aspect relates to normalizing latency in a networking environment to reduce the chances of creating an unfair advantage. While an exemplary aspect will be discussed in relation to a gaming environment, it is to be appreciated that the techniques disclosed herein can be applied to other environments where latency normalization or the ability to maintain latency between various endpoints is desired. For example, other environments include eSporting, on-line betting, fantasy esports, streaming services, etc. Some more specific examples include World of Warcraft®, Overwatch®, H1Z1®, PUBG®, Fortnite®, Realm Royale®, Planet Side 2®, real-time strategy games, slot machines, electronic poker tournaments, etc.
1 . A computer-implemented method for provisioning a network based on latency requirements, the method comprising:
measuring, via at least one processor, endpoint latencies over one or more networks to a plurality of endpoints;
determining, via the at least one processor, latency sensitivities for at least one latency-sensitive event;
grouping, via the at least one processor, the plurality of endpoints into at least two groups based on the measured endpoint latencies, wherein a first group has a first common latency range and a second group has a second common latency range;
provisioning, via the at least one processor, network resources for each of the at least two groups based on their respective common latency ranges and the latency sensitivities of the at least one latency-sensitive event, wherein the first group of the at least two groups receives greater network resources than the second group of the at least two groups;
logging, via the at least one processor, information related to the at least one latency-sensitive event in a notarized ledger;
sending, via the at least one processor, event information related to the at least one latency-sensitive event to the plurality of endpoints using the provisioned network resources; and
enabling presentation of the event information on the plurality of endpoints at a synchronized time.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one latency-sensitive event is associated with a video game.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one latency-sensitive event is associated with an eSports competition.
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one latency-sensitive event is associated with online betting.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one latency-sensitive event is associated with a streaming service.
6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the notarized ledger is a blockchain-based ledger.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the notarized ledger is a distributed ledger.
8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the notarized ledger is a peer-to-peer ledger.
9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising offering, via the at least one processor, a subscription to a low latency communication channel to at least one endpoint.
10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein provisioning network resources further includes allocating bandwidth based on the latency sensitivities.
11 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, via the at least one processor, a delay for sending the event information to each of the at least two groups based on their respective common latency ranges.
12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising excluding, via the at least one processor, at least one endpoint from receiving the event information based on a measured latency of the at least one endpoint exceeding a threshold.
13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating, via the at least one processor, a non-latency sensitive event for endpoints with latencies exceeding a threshold.
14 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the latency sensitivities are determined based on a type of the at least one latency-sensitive event.
15 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting, via the at least one processor, the latency sensitivities as the at least one latency-sensitive event evolves.
16 . The method of claim 1 , wherein measuring endpoint latencies includes using GPS-based time information.
17 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, via the at least one processor, latency guarantees as part of a Quality of Service (QOS) agreement.
18 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising dynamically switching, via the at least one processor, communication channels for at least one endpoint based on changing latency measurements.
19 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the provisioned network resources include redundant communication paths to guarantee latency measures.
20 . A system, comprising:
at least one computer readable memory storing software instructions; and
at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory and that performs the following operations upon execution of the software instructions:
measuring endpoint latencies over one or more networks to a plurality of endpoints;
determining latency sensitivities for at least one latency-sensitive event;
grouping the plurality of endpoints into at least two groups based on the measured endpoint latencies, wherein a first group has a first common latency range and a second group has a second common latency range;
provisioning network resources for each of the at least two groups based on their respective common latency ranges and the latency sensitivities of the at least one latency-sensitive event;
logging information related to the at least one latency-sensitive event in a notarized ledger;
sending event information related to the at least one latency-sensitive event to the plurality of endpoints using the provisioned network resources; and
enabling presentation of the event information on the plurality of endpoints at a synchronized time.