IP Library Granted Patent US 12,734,367
Granted Patent B2
US 12,734,367 · App. 19/126,999 · Granted Sep 15, 2026

Techniques for predicting and treating refractory ventricular fibrillation

Inventors: Jason Coult (Seattle, WA); Thomas Rea (Seattle, WA); Peter J. Kudenchuk (Seattle, WA); Heemun Kwok (Seattle, WA); Jose Nathan Kutz (Seattle, WA)
Assignee: University of Washington
A61N1/3925A61N1/39044G16H50/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,734,367
App. No.
19/126,999
Granted
Sep 15, 2026
Kind
B2
Abstract

An example method includes identifying a first segment of an electrocardiogram (ECG) that ends prior to administration of an electrical shock and identifying at least one second segment of the ECG that begins after the administration of the electrical shock. The example method further includes predicting, based on the first segment and the at least one second segment, that the ECG is indicative of a defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm. The first segment is converted into a first scalogram, and the at least one segment is converted into at least one second scalogram. The defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm is predicted based on comparisons between the scalograms and the eigenscalograms. An indication of the predicted defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm is output.

Claims (79)

1 . A medical device, comprising:

at least one sensor configured to detect an electrocardiogram (ECG) of a patient who is in a state of cardiac arrest;

an output device configured to output an instruction to administer a treatment; and

a processor configured to:

identify a pre-shock segment of the ECG, the pre-shock segment being detected by the sensor when a heart of the patient is in a state of ventricular fibrillation (VF) during a time interval preceding administration of an initial electrical shock to the heart of the patient;

identify at least one post-shock segment of the ECG, the at least one post-shock segment being detected by the sensor during a time interval following administration of the initial electrical shock to the heart of the patient;

predict, based on the pre-shock segment and the at least one post-shock segment, that the patient is exhibiting shock-refractory VF by:

converting the pre-shock segment into a first scalogram;

converting the at least one post-shock segment into at least one second scalogram;

generating comparisons between the first scalogram and the at least one second scalogram to eigenscalograms; and

determining whether the comparisons are indicative of shock-refractory VF; and

in response to predicting that the patient is exhibiting shock-refractory VF, cause the output device to output the instruction to administer a treatment.

2 . The medical device of claim 1 , wherein the processor is configured to convert the pre-shock segment into the first scalogram by performing a Morlet wavelet transform on the pre-shock segment, and

wherein the processor is configured to convert the at least one post-shock segment into the at least one second scalogram by performing the Morlet wavelet transform on the at least one post-shock segment.

3 . The medical device of claim 1 , wherein the patient is receiving first chest compressions during the time interval preceding administration of the initial electrical shock to the heart of the patient and the processor is further configured to remove artifacts associated with the first chest compressions from the pre-shock segment of the ECG, and/or

wherein the patient is receiving second chest compressions during the time interval following the administration of the initial electrical shock to the heart of the patient and the processor is further configured to reduce artifacts associated with the second chest compressions from the at least one post-shock segment of the ECG.

4 . The medical device of claim 3 , wherein the processor is further configured to:

reduce artifacts associated with the second chest compressions from the at least one post-shock segment of the ECG by normalizing wavelet coefficient magnitude values of the at least one second scalogram, and

normalize the first scalograms and the second scalograms by dividing wavelet coefficient magnitude values within each scalogram frequency by at least one of a maximum, median, or mean wavelet coefficient magnitude within each scalogram frequency.

5 . The medical device of claim 1 , wherein the treatment comprises administration of an antiarrhythmic medication to the patient, administration of a subsequent electrical shock at a different vector than the initial electrical shock, administration of a double-sequential defibrillation (DSD) treatment, administration of cardiac catheterization treatment, withholding of vasopressor treatment, or administration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment.

6 . The medical device of claim 1 , wherein generating comparisons between the first scalogram and the at least one second scalogram to eigenscalograms comprises:

identifying pre-shock dot products by comparing the pre-shock scalogram to the eigenscalograms;

identifying post-shock dot products by comparing the at least one post-shock scalogram to the eigenscalograms, and

wherein determining that the comparisons are indicative of shock-refractory VF comprises

inputting the pre-shock dot products and the post-shock dot products into a trained machine learning (ML) model; and

receiving a classification that the patient is susceptible to shock-refractory VF from the trained ML model.

7 . The medical device of claim 1 , wherein the output device is configured to output the instruction to administer the treatment during a CPR period following the administration of the initial electrical shock to the patient, and

wherein the CPR period ends about 2 minutes after administration of the initial electrical shock to the patient.

8 . A method, comprising:

identifying a first segment of an electrocardiogram (ECG) that ends prior to administration of an electrical shock;

identifying at least one second segment of the ECG that begins after the administration of the electrical shock;

predicting, based on the first segment and the at least one second segment, that the ECG is indicative of a defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm by:

converting the first segment into a first scalogram;

comparing the first scalogram to eigenscalograms;

converting the at least one second segment into at least one second scalogram; and

comparing the at least one second scalogram to eigenscalograms; and

outputting an indication of the predicted defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm.

9 . The method of claim 8 , wherein converting the first segment into a first scalogram comprises performing a wavelet transform on the first segment, and

wherein converting the at least one second segment into at least one second scalogram comprises performing a wavelet transform on the at least one second segment.

10 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the at least one second segment comprises chest compression artifacts, and

wherein the method further comprises:

reducing the chest compression artifacts from the at least one segment by normalizing wavelet coefficient magnitude values of the second scalograms.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein normalizing the wavelet coefficient magnitude values of the second scalograms comprises dividing the wavelet coefficient magnitude values within each scalogram frequency by at least one of a maximum, a median, or a mean wavelet coefficient magnitude within each scalogram frequency.

12 . The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

trimming the first scalogram to a first frequency range,

trimming the second scalogram to a second frequency range, and

wherein the first frequency range is broader than the second frequency range.

13 . The method of claim 8 , wherein comparing the first scalogram to eigenscalograms comprises determining first dot products of the first segment,

wherein comparing the at least one second scalogram to the eigenscalograms comprises determining second dot products of the at least one second segment, and

wherein determining that the ECG is indicative of the defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm comprises inputting the first dot products and the second dot products into a classifier, the classifier being at least one of a trained random forest model, SVM, or k-nearest neighbor model.

14 . The method of claim 8 , the electrical shock being a first electrical shock, the method further comprising:

outputting an instruction to administer an additional treatment,

wherein the additional treatment comprises at least one of administration of an antiarrhythmic medication, administration of a second electrical shock at a different vector than the first electric shock, administration of the second electrical shock at a higher energy level than the first electrical shock, administration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, administration of a cardiac catheterization treatment, or administration of DSD.

15 . The method of claim 8 , wherein predicting, based on the first segment and the second segment, that the ECG is indicative of the defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm further comprises:

determining that the first segment exhibits VF; and

determining that at least one of a frequency, energy, or magnitude of the VF is below a threshold.

16 . The method of claim 8 , wherein outputting the indication of the predicted defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm occurs during a CPR period following the electrical shock, and/or

wherein outputting the indication of the predicted defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm occurs within two minutes of administration of the electrical shock.

17 . The method of claim 8 , wherein identifying the at least one second segment of the ECG that begins after the administration of the electrical shock comprises:

identifying a third segment of the ECG that begins after the administration of the electrical shock;

determining that the defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm cannot be predicted based on the first segment and the third segment; and

in response to determining that the defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm cannot be predicted based on the first segment and the third segment, identifying the at least one second segment of the ECG that comprises the third segment and a fourth segment of the ECG that begins after the third segment.

18 . The method of claim 8 , wherein the at least one second segment of the ECG comprises multiple segments of the ECG that begin after the administration of the electrical shock, and

wherein the multiple segments occur within about 1 minute after the administration of the electrical shock.

19 . A computing device, comprising:

at least one processor; and

memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

identifying a first segment of an electrocardiogram (ECG) that ends prior to administration of an electrical shock;

identifying at least one second segment of the ECG that begins after the administration of the electrical shock;

predicting, based on the first segment and the at least one second segment, that the ECG is indicative of a defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm by:

converting the first segment into a first scalogram;

comparing the first scalogram to eigenscalograms:

converting the at least one second segment into at least one second scalogram; and

comparing the at least one second scalogram to eigenscalograms; and

outputting an indication of the predicted defibrillation-resistant heart rhythm.

20 . The computing device of claim 19 , wherein the operations further comprise:

trimming the first scalogram to a first frequency range,

trimming the second scalogram to a second frequency range, and

wherein the first frequency range is broader than the second frequency range.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2026
From: COULT, JASON; REA, THOMAS; KUDENCHUK, PETER J.; KWOK, HEEMUN; KUTZ, JOSE NATHAN
To: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
Reel/Frame 074578/0113 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 6, 2026
From: COULT, JASON; REA, THOMAS; KUDENCHUK, PETER J.; KWOK, HEEMUN; KUTZ, JOSE NATHAN
To: UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
Reel/Frame 074577/0970 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63421901 · Nov 2, 2022
Related Publication 20260000903A1 · Jan 1, 2026
References Cited (46)
US 7171269B1 · Addison · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 10448853B2 · Mahajan et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10548499B2 · Bayasi et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10726545B2 · Marrouche et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20030153951A1 · Ideker · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20080109041A1 · de Voir · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080269818A1 · Sullivan · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20140207012A1 · Coult et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20200305799A1 · Cao et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200316393A1 · Chapman · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220193431A1 · Chapman · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220369930A1 · Robinson et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
KR 102448860B1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
“Annual Report to the King County Council”, https://www.kingcounty.gov/depts/health/emergency-medical-services/reports.aspx, Nov. 2019, 69 pages. [cited by applicant]
Aiello, et al., “Targeted Delivery of Electrical Shocks and Epinephrine, Guided by Ventricular Fibrillation Amplitude Spectral Area, Reduces Electrical and Adrenergic Myocardial Burden, Improving Survival in Swine”, J A… [cited by applicant]
Ajam, et al., “Reliability of the Cerebral Performance Category to classify neurological status among survivors of ventricular fibrillation arrest: a cohort study”, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med., vol. 19, No. 38, Jun… [cited by applicant]
Attia, et al., “An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction”, Lancet, vol. 394, No. 10… [cited by applicant]
Bartos, et al., “Improved Survival With Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Despite Progressive Metabolic Derangement Associated With Prolonged Resuscitation”, Circulation, vol. 141, No. 11, Mar. 2020, pp. 877-… [cited by applicant]
Berdowski, et al., “Time in recurrent ventricular fibrillation and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest”, Circulation, vol. 122, No. 11, Sep. 2010, pp. 1101-1108. [cited by applicant]
Bhandari, et al., “Rhythm profiles and survival after out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest”, Resuscitation, vol. 125, Apr. 2018, pp. 22-27. [cited by applicant]
Brown, et al., “Role of artificial intelligence in defibrillators: a narrative review”, Open Heart, vol. 9, No. 2, Jul. 2022, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Brunton & Kutz, “Data-Driven Science and Engineering: Machine Learning, Dynamical Systems, and Control”, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Chen, et al., “Decoding Artificial Intelligence to Achieve Diagnostic Excellence: Learning From Experts, Examples, and Experience”, JAMA., vol. 328, No. 8, Aug. 2022, pp. 709-710. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “A Machine Learning Algorithm To Predict Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation”, American Heart Assoc., vol. 146, No. 1, Nov. 2022, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “A method to predict ventricular fibrillation shock outcome during chest compressions”, Comput Biol Med., vol. 129, No. 104136, Feb. 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “Continuous assessment of ventricular fibrillation prognostic status during CPR: Implications for resuscitation”, Resuscitation, vol. 179, Oct. 2022, pp. 152-162. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “Prediction of Shock-Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation During Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest”, Circulation, vol. 148, No. 4, Jul. 2023, pp. 327-335. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Analysis During Chest Compressions to Predict Survival From Cardiac Arrest”, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol., vol. 12, No. 1, Jan. 2019, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Coult, et al., “Ventricular fibrillation waveform measures combined with prior shock outcome predict defibrillation success during cardiopulmonary resuscitation”, J Electrocardiol., vol. 51, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 99-106. [cited by applicant]
Cuocolo, et al., “Current applications of big data and machine learning in cardiology”, J Geriatr Cardiol., vol. 16, No. 8, Aug. 2019, pp. 601-607. [cited by applicant]
De Graaf, et al., “Analyzing the heart rhythm during chest compressions: Performance and clinical value of a new AED algorithm”, Resuscitation, vol. 162, May 2021, pp. 320-328. [cited by applicant]
Feeny, et al., “Machine Learning Prediction of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Improvement Versus Current Guidelines”, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol., vol. 12, No. 7, Jul. 2019, 25 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gliner & White, “Electrocardiogram of defibrillation shocks delivered to out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest patients”, Resuscitation, vol. 41, No. 2, Jul. 1999, pp. 133-144. [cited by applicant]
Holmen, et al., “Survival in ventricular fibrillation with emphasis on the number of defibrillations in relation to other factors at resuscitation”, Resuscitation, vol. 113, Apr. 2017, pp. 33-38. [cited by applicant]
Hu, et al., “The performance of a new shock advisory algorithm to reduce interruptions during CPR”, Resuscitation, vol. 143, Oct. 2019, pp. 1-9. [cited by applicant]
Karlis, et al., “Effects of early amiodarone administration during and immediately after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model”, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand., vol. 58, No. 1, Jan. 2014, pp. 114-122. [cited by applicant]
Kwok, et al., “A method for continuous rhythm classification and early detection of ventricular fibrillation during CPR”, Resuscitation, vol. 176, Jul. 2022, pp. 90-97. [cited by applicant]
Lautz, et al., “Hemodynamic-Directed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Neurologic Outcomes and Mitochondrial Function in the Heart and Brain”, Crit Care Med., vol. 47, No. 3, Mar. 2019, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Panchal, et al., “2018 American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs During and Immediately After Cardiac Arrest: An Update to the American Heart Associati… [cited by applicant]
Panchal, et al., “Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care”, Circulation, vol. 142, No. 16, Oct. 2020,… [cited by applicant]
Perkins, et al., “Cardiac Arrest a nd Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest”, Resuscitation, vol. 96, Nov. 2015, pp. 328… [cited by applicant]
Rahimi, et al., “Effect of Time to Treatment With Antiarrhythmic Drugs on Return of Spontaneous Circulation in Shock- Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest”, J Am Heart Assoc., vol. 11, No. 6, Mar. 2022, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Santangeli, et al., “Examining the safety of amiodarone”, Expert Opin Drug Saf., vol. 11, No. 2, Mar. 2012, pp. 191-214. [cited by applicant]
Yannopoulos, et al., “Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial”… [cited by applicant]
Lupton, et al., “Development of a Clinical Decision Rule for the Early Prediction of Shock-Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest,” Resuscitation, Oct. 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Sashidhar et al., “Machine learning and feature engineering for predicting pulse presence during chest compressions,” R Soc Open Sci, vol. 8, No. 11, Nov. 2021, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]