IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,502,201
Granted Patent B2
US 12,502,201 · App. 19/183,628 · Granted Dec 23, 2025

Transperineal prostate biopsy device, systems, and methods of use

Inventor: Matthew J. Allaway (Cumberland, MD)
A61B17/3403A61B8/0841A61B8/12A61B10/0241A61B10/04A61B90/39A61B2010/045A61B2017/00274A61B2017/00477A61B2017/3405A61B2017/3411A61B2017/3413A61B2018/00547A61B18/02A61B18/12A61B2090/3925A61B2090/3933A61B2090/3954A61B2090/3966
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,502,201
App. No.
19/183,628
Granted
Dec 23, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A transperineal biopsy guide for use with an access needle and a transrectal imaging probe. The transperineal biopsy guide includes a mount, a guide member, and an access needle support structure. The mount is attachable to the probe. The guide member includes: a first side comprising a first distal member and a first surface extending proximally from the first distal member; a second side comprising a second distal member and a second surface extending proximally from the second distal member; and a gap between the first distal member and the second distal member. The access needle support structure is securable to the guide member in a distal position that inhibits vertical and distal displacement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member while permitting disengagement from the distal position via proximal movement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member.

Claims (33)

1 . A transperineal biopsy guide configured for use with an access needle and a transrectal imaging probe adjacent a patient's perineum, the access needle including a proximal end hub, a distal sharp end opposite the proximal end hub and a longitudinal axis extending between the proximal end hub and the distal sharp end, the access needle sized to receive a biopsy instrument therethrough, the transrectal imaging probe including a proximal end, a distal end and a longitudinal axis extending between the proximal end and the distal end, the transrectal imaging probe configured to provide imaging in an imaging plane of the transrectal imaging probe, the transperineal biopsy guide comprising:

a mount attachable to the transrectal imaging probe between the proximal and distal ends of the transrectal imaging probe;

a guide member extending from the mount and including:

a first side comprising a first distal member and a first surface extending proximally from the first distal member;

a second side comprising a second distal member and a second surface extending proximally from the second distal member; and

a gap between the first distal member and the second distal member; and

an access needle support structure securable to the guide member in a distal position that inhibits vertical displacement and distal displacement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member while permitting disengagement from the distal position via proximal movement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member, the access needle support structure configured to support the access needle at a plurality of heights relative to the mount with the access needle being at least partially located in the gap when the access needle support structure is secured to the guide member in the distal position, the access needle support structure comprising first and second members extending laterally therefrom, the first and second members being on opposite sides of the access needle support structure.

2 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein, in the distal position, the first member of the access needle support structure abuts the first distal member and the first surface, and the second member of the access needle support structure abuts the second distal member and the second surface.

3 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 2 , wherein the vertical displacement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member is inhibited by interaction of the first member with the first surface, and by interaction of the second member with the second distal member and the second surface.

4 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 3 , wherein the vertical displacement and the distal displacement of the access needle support structure relative to the guide member is inhibited by interaction of the first member with the first distal member and the first surface, and by interaction of the second member with the second distal member and the second surface.

5 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein the access needle support structure further comprising an opening configured to receive the access needle.

6 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 5 , wherein the access needle support structure further comprising a plurality of openings, the opening being one of the plurality of openings.

7 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 5 , wherein the access needle and the access needle support structure are securable together when access needle is received in the opening.

8 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 7 , wherein the proximal end hub of the access needle and a proximal end of the opening include corresponding surfaces that inhibit rotation therebetween when the proximal end hub is received in the proximal end of the opening.

9 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 5 , wherein, when the access needle support structure is secured to the guide member, the opening of the access needle support structure is centrally positioned relative to the first side and the second side of the guide member.

10 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein the gap is vertically between a top side of the first and second distal members and a bottom side of the first and second distal members.

11 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein the first surface includes a first ramp and the second surface includes a second ramp, and wherein, in in the distal position, the first member is positioned intermediate of the first distal member and the first ramp, and the second member is positioned intermediate of the second distal member and the second ramp.

12 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein the first and second members are generally parallel with each other.

13 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein, when the mount is attached to the transrectal imaging probe, movement of the transrectal imaging probe causes corresponding movement to the guide member.

14 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , further comprising the access needle.

15 . The transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 , wherein the transrectal imaging probe provides ultrasound imaging.

16 . A method of performing a transperineal biopsy procedure, the method comprising:

providing the transperineal biopsy guide of claim 1 ;

attaching the mount of the transperineal biopsy guide to the transrectal imaging probe;

supporting the access needle to the access needle support structure;

securing the access needle support structure to the guide member in the distal position;

inserting the access needle into the patient's perineum along a first trajectory; and

inserting at least part of the biopsy instrument through the access needle and into the prostate and taking a first biopsy of the prostate along the first trajectory.

17 . The method of claim 16 , further comprising: without removing the access needle from the patient's perineum, moving the transrectal imaging probe thereby moving the access needle to a second trajectory; and inserting at least part of the biopsy instrument through the access needle and into the prostate and taking a second biopsy of the prostate along the second trajectory, the first trajectory and the second trajectory being different from each other.

18 . The method of claim 16 , wherein supporting the access needle to the access needle support structure comprises securing the access needle to the access needle support structure.

19 . The method of claim 18 , wherein, in being secured to the access needle support structure, rotation of the access needle relative to the access needle support structure is inhibited.

20 . The method of claim 16 , wherein the access needle support structure further comprising an opening, and supporting the access needle to the access needle support structure comprises inserting the access needle into the opening.

21 . The method of claim 20 , wherein inserting the access needle into the opening causes the proximal end hub of the access needle to at least partially be positioned within a proximal end of the opening thereby inhibiting rotation of the access needle relative to the access needle support structure.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2026
From: CORBIN CLINICAL RESOURCES, INC.
To: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
Reel/Frame 075734/0844 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2026
From: CORBIN CLINICAL RESOURCES, LLC
To: CORBIN CLINICAL RESOURCES, INC.
Reel/Frame 075833/0246 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2025
From: ALLAWAY, MATTHEW J
To: CORBIN CLINICAL RESOURCES, LLC
Reel/Frame 071092/0139 →
Continuity (11)
Continuation 18094534 · Jan 9, 2023
Continuation 17698641 · Mar 18, 2022
Continuation 17494962 · Oct 6, 2021
Continuation In Part 17314845 · May 7, 2021
Continuation In Part 16991150 · Aug 12, 2020
Continuation 16115180 · Aug 28, 2018
Continuation 14874104 · Oct 2, 2015
Continuation 14677286 · Apr 2, 2015
Continuation In Part 14677286 · Apr 2, 2015
Provisional Application 61974826 · Apr 3, 2014
Related Publication 20250248735A1 · Aug 7, 2025
References Cited (310)
US 4735215A · Goto et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4742829A · Law et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4776346A · Beraha et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4838506A · Cooper · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4911173A · Terwilliger · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5047036A · Koutrouvelis · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5161542A · Palestrant · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5494039A · Onik · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 5800389A · Burney et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5871448A · Ellard · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5931786A · Whitmore, III et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5976092A · Chinn · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6398711B1 · Green et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6485426B2 · Sandhu · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6485469B1 · Stewart et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6575906B1 · Schembri, Jr. · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 7959573B2 · Furia · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8057432B2 · Flagle et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8403842B2 · Sakhel · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 10064681B2 · Allaway · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10743909B2 · Allaway · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10743910B2 · Allaway · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10743911B2 · Allaway · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11096762B2 · Allaway · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11246677B2 · Allaway · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11446056B2 · Allaway · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11547436B2 · Allaway · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11583310B2 · Allaway · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 12144519B2 · Allaway · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20020061300A1 · Gokcen · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020087152A1 · Mikus et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020123689A1 · Furia · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020156361A1 · Popowski et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030135115A1 · Burdette · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030153850A1 · Davis · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030176759A1 · Hogendijk et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030212414A1 · Sonek · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040031721A1 · Mann · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040143188A1 · Barzell et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040162458A1 · Green · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040167542A1 · Solar et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040220444A1 · Hogendijk et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050159676A1 · Taylor · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050283120A1 · Wang · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060241477A1 · Sasady et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070043291A1 · Fidel · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070073219A1 · Yang · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070233157A1 · Mark et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080004481A1 · Bax · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080027007A1 · Benner et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080039889A1 · Lamson et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080154198A1 · Wei · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080221453A1 · Suri et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090030339A1 · Cheng · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090093715A1 · Downey et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090234369A1 · Bax et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090292224A1 · Bowman et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100036245A1 · Yu et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100049186A1 · Ingle et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100160711A1 · Noyes · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100172559A1 · Kumar et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20100204688A1 · Hoey et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110009748A1 · Greene et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110071380A1 · Goldenberg · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110142936A1 · Campbell et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110319759A1 · Liu · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120010512A1 · O'Laughlin · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120157841A1 · Glaenzer · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120203095A1 · Krieger et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120245455A1 · Bauman · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130142875A1 · Shemi · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130310680A1 · Werahera · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140039314A1 · Stoianovici · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140094774A1 · Blanchard · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150119715A1 · Baumann · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150150459A1 · Werahera · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150242486A1 · Chari · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150366544A1 · Yap · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160081736A1 · Hoey et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160242810A1 · Neice · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160243232A1 · Pickett · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180168711A1 · Hoey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180193080A1 · Hoey et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200214768A1 · Baumann et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200367925A1 · Allaway · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210259801A1 · Allaway · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210338267A1 · Allaway · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220168012A1 · Wen et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
JP 4550531B2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO9934735A1 · 1999 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2006089426A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013155156A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Aba Yazid et al. Integrating Deflection Models and Image Feedback for Real-Time Flexible Needle Steering. IEEE Transactions on Robotics Apr. 2013; vol. 29, No. 2:542-553. [cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
[cited by applicant]
Ahrar K., et al., Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP24-Biopsy Devices and Techniques, Chapter 1 Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy, Springer 2014, pp. 1-17. [cited by applicant]
Ahrar K., et al., “Dutch Patent Litigation Document Exhibit RP-7 Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Chapter 4,” Percutaneous Image-Guided Biopsy, Springer, 2014, pp. 39-47. [cited by applicant]
Australian Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2015240520, mailed on Dec. 17, 2018, 3 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Australian Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2019203558, mailed on Feb. 26, 2020, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Australian Examination_Report, App. 2023200954, Jun. 6, 2024, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
BARD Biopsy Systems, Biopsy Product Catalog (c. 2011), 36 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Batura D., et al., Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance in Intestinal Flora of Patients Undergoing Prostatic Biopsy: Implications for Prophylaxis and Treatment of Infections after Biopsy, BJU International, 2010, vol.… [cited by applicant]
Best Approach for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Prospective Study on Transperineal Versus Transrectal Six-core Prostate Biopsy by P. Emiliozzi et al. Adult Urology. 961-966. 2003. (Year: 2003). [cited by applicant]
BK Medical, Endosonic Probe Type 1850 for BK Medical Ultrasound Scanners, Apr. 2010, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
BK Medical, “Biplane and Endfire Transducer User Guide Type 8818,” BK Ultrasound Model No. UA 1324, Jun. 2012, retrieved from the internet: URL: http://bkultrasound.com/support/bk/resources/user-manuals, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
BK Medical, Prostate Biplane Transducer Type 8808e, User Guide (Jun. 2023) (“BK Medical”). [cited by applicant]
Bluvol., et al., Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP30-Freehand Versus Guided Breast Biopsy: Comparison of Accuracy, Needle Motion, and Biopsy Time in a Tissue Model, AJR:1… [cited by applicant]
Buchberger et al. Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique, accuracy, and indications. Radiology 2002; 42:25-32. [cited by applicant]
Canadian Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2940211, mailed on Nov. 19, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al. Computed tomography-guided transgluteal prostate biopsy using a coaxial needle system: technical note. Canadian Association of Radiologists (CARJ) Jun. 2003; vol. 54, No. 3, 181-182. [cited by applicant]
Chang., et al., Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP31-Transperineal biopsy of the prostate-is this the future?, Nature Reviews, Urology, Dec. 2013, vol. 10, pp. 690-702. [cited by applicant]
Coucher et al. Percutaneous coaxial needle biopsy using the spacer technique: a novel and easy modification to increase procedure safety. Clinical Radiology (2005) 60, 926-929. [cited by applicant]
Dundee., et al., “Dutch Patent Litigation Document Exhibit 24 Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Template-Guided or Freehand?,” BJU International, 2014, vol. 681, No. 3, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Deed Submitting Reactive Exhibits (English translation of Netherlands document), mailed on Nov. 16, 2021, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Endosonic Probe User Guide Type 1850 BK Medical, Aug. 2006, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Exhibit 19 Second Expert Report of Dr. Rick Popert MS FRCS (UROL), mailed on Nov. 15, 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Exhibit 21 Witness Statement of Dr. Matthew J. Allaway, mailed on Nov. 15, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Expert Report of Dr. Rick Popert MS FRCS (UROL), mailed on Oct. 2021, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Instrument on the Production of Counter-Productions, Nov. 23, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Judgment Feb. 3, 2022, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement from Jos J. Immerzeel MD, Nov. 22, 2021, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense dated Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP15-Images of UA1232 BK Medical, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense (English translation of Netherlands document), mailed on Nov. 2, 2021, 68 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production 16—Images of SureFire and UA1232 BK Medical, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP18—Sasady WO99/034735, Jul. 15, 1999, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP19—Transducer Type 8848 Product Data for BK Medical Ultrasound Systems, Oct. 2011, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP20—Biplane Transducer Type 8808 User Guide BK Medical, Jun. 2012, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP21—Biplane and Endfire Transducer Type 8818 for BK Medical Ultrasound Scanners, Product Data, Apr. 2010, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP22—Endorectal Biplane Transducer Type 8808e for BK medical Ultrasound Scanners, Product Data, Aug. 2010, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP23—Biplane and Endfire Transducer Type 8818 User Guide BK Medical, Jun. 2012, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP32—Zur Früherkennung von Prostatakrebs, Gesundheitswesen, Oct. 2012, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP33—CareFusion Soft Tissue Biopsy Needles, 2011, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Summons in Interlocutory Proceedings (English translation of Netherlands document), mailed on Oct. 21, 2021, 46 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Tru-Cut Soft Tissue Biopsy Needles, Instructions for Use, Aug. 7, 2019, 24 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Witness Statement from Assoc. Prof. Frantisek Zatura, M.D., Ph.D., Nov. 22, 2021, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Dutch Patent Litigation Document Witness Statement of Saheed Rashid, mailed on Oct. 15, 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Eldred-Evans D., et al., “The Use of Transperineal Sector Biopsy as A First-Line Biopsy Strategy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Complications,” Urological Oncology, Exhibit 2015, Jun. 2016, 7 p… [cited by applicant]
Emiliozzi., et al., The Value of a Single Biopsy With 12 Transperineal Cores For Detecting Prostate Cancer in Patients with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen, Journal of Urology, Sep. 2001, vol. 166, pp. 845-850. [cited by applicant]
Epo, Notice of Opposition to EP Patent 3827779, Opponent: Advance Medical Design Inc., dated Oct. 24, 2023, 9 pgs. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Notice of Opposition to EP Patent 3827779, Opponent: JA Kemp LLP, dated Oct. 25, 2023, 6 pgs. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Proprietor's Response to Notice of Opposition in EP3827779, dated May 10, 2024 110 pgs. [cited by applicant]
EPO, Submission in Opposition Proceedings of EP3827779 Opponent: JA Kemp, Aug. 23, 2024, 100 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Examination Report for European Application No. 21153023.3, mailed on Mar. 24, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Examination Report for European Application No. 15773805.5, mailed on Sep. 2, 2019, 5 Pages. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report for European Application No. 15773805.5, mailed on Oct. 13, 2017, 7 Pages. [cited by applicant]
EX1002, File History of the '681 Patent, produced by Corbin Clinical as CORBIN_CLINICAL—000017. [cited by applicant]
EX1016, Patent Owner's Amendment Infringement Contentions for the '681 Patent in [cited by applicant]
EX1018, Advance 'Medical's Updated Claim Construction Brief in Copending Litigation. [cited by applicant]
Examiner Interview Presentation in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019257, Jun. 18, 2024 , 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1007, BK Medical, Prostate Biplane Transducer Type 8808e, User Guide (Jun. 2012) (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1011, U.S. Pat. No. 5,494,039 to Gary Onik, et al. (10 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1012, Japan Patent Publication No. 4-550531 B2 to Nakamura, entitled Puncture Adapter, dated Mar. 23, 2006 (36 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1015, Declaration of Frantisek Zat'ura, M.D., Ph.D. from Related Proceeding in the Netherlands and certified English translation of the same (14 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1016, Internet Archive Reports for BK Medical References (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1017, Judgment issued Feb. 3, 2022 by the District Curt of the Hague, Case No. C/U.S. Appl. No. 09/619,229/KG ZA 21-974, [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1017, Papers from Related Proceeding in the Netherlands with certified English translation (29 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1018, Corbin Clinical Resources, LLC's Amended Proposed Claim Construction Statement and Advance Medical Designs, Inc.'s Supplemental Responsive Claim Construction Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 805(1)(b) (32 … [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1019, Claim chart for U.S. Pat. No. 11,096,762 (70 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1019, Patent Owner's Amended Infringement Contentions for the '677 Patent filed in [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1019, Patent Owners Amendment Infringement Contentions for the 056 Patent filed in [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 1021, USDC, District of Maryland, Corbin Clinical Resources, LLC's Amended Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed Sep. 15, 2023 in Case No. 1:22-cv-00789-SAG (59 pages). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2001 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Declaration of Dr. Abhinav Sidana, MBBS. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2002 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, CV of Dr. Abhinav Sidana, MBBS. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2004 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Schmeuesser, et al. (2022), Hundred years of transperineal prostate biopsy. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2005 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Grummet, et al. (2020), 'TREXIT 2020': why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2006 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 Jun. 27, 2024, Expert Report of Dr. Rick Popert MS FRCS (UROL) prepared for the District Court of the Hague. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2007 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Witness Statement of Dr. Matthew Allaway prepared for EPO Opposition to EP 827779B1. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2008 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Press Release, Men's Infection Risk Plunges under Prostate-Biopsy Method Adopted by Baylor St. Luke's M… [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2009 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Brotherhood of the Balloon, The PrecisionPoint Transperineal Biopsy, https://protonbob.com/precisionpoi… [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2010 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Hartford Healthcare, St. Vincent's Medical Center, This New Technology Makes Prostate Cancer Easier to … [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2011 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, YouTube Transcript, The PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System ( http://perineologic.com), https://… [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2012 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Merit Medical Product Brochure for Tru-cut biopsy needles. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2012 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Examination U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Aug. 12, 2024, Expert Declaration of Dr. Rick Popert. [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2013 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Jankowski M et al., Kidney biopsy in dogs and cats, Pak. Vet. J., 33(2): 133-138 (2013). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2014 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, BK Medical, Prostate Biplane Transducer 8808, User Guide (Mar. 2017) (“BK Medical 3”). [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2015 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Winners Announced at the 19th Annual Medical Design Excellence Awards (MDEA) Award Ceremony, published … [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2016 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, Meyer et al., Initial Experience Performing In-Office Ultrasound-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsy U… [cited by applicant]
Exhibit 2017 to Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 dated Jun. 27, 2024, BXTA, Transforming Local Anesthetic Prostate Biopsies with PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access SystemTM. [cited by applicant]
Expert Declaration of Dr. Abhinav Sidana, dated Nov. 13, 2024, 42 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Expert Declaration of Dr. Abhinav Sidana, dated Dec. 9, 2024, 40 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 20155855.8, mailed on Apr. 23, 2020, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21784653.4, mailed Apr. 8, 2024, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21153023.3, mailed on May 3, 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ficarra V., et al., “Needle Core Length Is a Quality Indicator of Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsy,” 50 European Urology, 2006, vol. 266, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,104, mailed on Jan. 17, 2020, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action in Re-Exam 90019257, dated Sep. 10, 2024, 34 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/094,534, dated Dec. 19, 2024, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
GALFANO., et al., Dutch Patent Litigation Document, Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP29-Prostate Biopsy: The Transperineal Approach, EAU-EBU Update Series 5, 2007, pp. 241-249. [cited by applicant]
Gazelle G.S., et al., “Guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Intraabdominal Lesions,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Nov. 1, 1989, vol. 153, No. 5, pp. 929-935. [cited by applicant]
Hatiboglu G., et al., “Application Technique: Placement of a Prostate-Rectum Spacer in Men Undergoing Prostate Radiation Therapy, ”110 BJU Int'l E647, May 10, 2012, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Hopper et al. Percutaneous Biopsy of the Liver and Kidney by Using Coaxial Technique: Adequacy of the Specimen Obtained with Three Different Needles in vitro. AJR 1995; 164:221- 224. [cited by applicant]
Hopper K.D., et al., “Multiple Fine-Needle Biopsies using a Coaxial Technique: Efficacy and a Comparison of Three Methods,” CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Sep. 1995, vol. 18, pp. 307-311. [cited by applicant]
Hungr et al. A 3D Ultrasound Robotic Prostate Brachytherapy System with Prostate Motion Tracking. IEEE T-Ro 11-0574 (2012), 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2015/024339, mailed on Sep. 15, 2015, 13 Pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2021/025946, mailed on Aug. 23, 2021, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2023/030018, dated Jan. 31, 2024. [cited by applicant]
“Interventional Ultrasound” by H. Henrik et al.Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 773-789, 1996 (Year: 1996). [cited by applicant]
Interview Summary in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019257, Jun. 18, 2024, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ja Kemp, Statement of Facts and Arguments in Support of Opposition EP 3827779, dated Oct. 25, 2023, 89 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Jones U.S., “Prostate Biopsy—Indications, Techniques and Complications,” Springer, 2008, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kilburn & Strode, Letter to EPO re EP Application No. 21153023.3, May 31, 2022, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Kum F., et al., “Initial Outcomes of Local Anaesthetic Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in the Outpatient Setting,” Urological Oncology, Exhibit 2017, 2017, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
Liss Ma., et al., “Prevalence and Significance of Fluoroquinolone Resistant Escherichia Coli in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Needle Biopsy,” Journal of Urology, Apr. 2011, vol. 185, No. 4, … [cited by applicant]
Loeb S., et al., “Complications after Prostate Biopsy: Data from SEER-Medicare,” Journal of Urology, 2011, vol. 186, No. 5, pp. 1830-1834. [cited by applicant]
MDL, “SemiCut,” MDL Catalog, Oct. 5, 2013, 1 page, Retrieved from the Internet: URL: https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/mdl/semicut/84369-100157.html. [cited by applicant]
Moulton et al. Coaxial Percutaneous Biopsy Technique with Automated Biopsy Devices: Value in Improving Accuracy and Negative Predictive Value. Radiology 1993; 186:515-522. [cited by applicant]
Mozer et al. Robotic Image-Guided Needle Interventions of the Prostate. Reviews in Urology 2009; vol. 11 No. 1:7-15. [cited by applicant]
Nam Rk., et al., “Increasing Hospital Admission Rates for Urological Complications After Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy,” Journal of Urology, 2013, vol. 189, No. 1, retrieved from the internet: URL: http:… [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for Ex-parte Reexamination 90019257 , dated Mar. 18, 2025, 44 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for Ex-parte Reexamination 90019354 , dated Jan. 16, 2025, 39 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/677,286, mailed on Oct. 6, 2017, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Application No. 14/874, 104, mailed on Jul. 23, 2019, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/115,180, mailed on Apr. 15, 2021, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,597, mailed on Jan. 22, 2020, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,597, mailed on Sep. 26, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,754, mailed on Jan. 17, 2020, 21 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,754, mailed on Sep. 26, 2019, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/314,845, dated Jul. 22, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/494,962, mailed on Feb. 3, 2022, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,372 dated Feb. 6, 2025, 47 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257, dated Mar. 27, 2024, 33 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 18/094,534, dated May 9, 2024, 32 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/115,180, mailed on Jun. 7, 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,597, mailed on Apr. 30, 2020, 29 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,754, mailed on May 7, 2020, 47 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/991,150, mailed on Oct. 26, 2022, 32 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 17/214,323, dated Jul. 17, 2024, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/390,212, dated Jun. 17, 2024, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/390,250, dated Jun. 13, 2024, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/533,466, dated Jul. 10, 2024, 31 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/907,913, dated Dec. 2, 2024, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 18/908,020, dated Nov. 27, 2024, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Intent to Issue an Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate for U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,354 ,dated May 23, 2025, 9 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Novella., et al., Dutch Patent Litigation Document Statement of Defense Nov. 2, 2021, Production GP27—Pain Assessment after Original Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Coaxial Needle, Urology, 2003, vol. 62, No. 4, p… [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019257, dated Oct. 28, 24, 20 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019335, dated Feb. 12, 2025, 60 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019335, dated Sep. 10, 24, 26 pgs. . [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019354, dated Aug. 14, 24, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019372, dated Feb. 6, 2025, 47 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Office Action in Ex Parte Re-Exam 90019372, dated Sep. 19, 2024, 31 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Order Granting Request for Reexamination re U.S. Pat. No. 11,446,056, U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257, dated Oct. 26, 2023, 18 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Ordering Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,096,762, mailed Feb. 6, 2024, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ordering Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 10,064,681, mailed Feb. 6, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ordering Granting Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,246,677, mailed Feb. 6, 2024, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
Parker S.H., et al., “Image-Directed Percutaneous Biopsies with a Biopsy Gun,” Radiology, Jun. 1, 1989, vol. 171, No. 03, pp. 663-669. [cited by applicant]
Petitioner's Request for Rehearing, Post Grant Review No. PGR2023-00041 (U.S. Pat. No. 11,547,436), [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1003, Declaration of Edward J. Yun, M.D., dated Jul. 19, 2023, 121 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1006, Bard Biopsy Systems, Bard® TruGuide® Disposable Coaxial Biopsy Needle Instructions for Use, May 2012, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1013, Declaration of Ingrid Hsieh-Yee, PhD, dated Jul. 17, 2023, 309 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1014, Declaration of Nico Eelbode, dated Jun. 11, 2023, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1018, The Parties Claim Construction Statements in [cited by applicant]
PGR Exhibit 1019, Patent Owner's Amended infringement Contentions for the '436 Patent in [cited by applicant]
Plaintiff Advance Medical Designs, Inc.'s Reply Supplemental Claim Construction Brief Case No. 1:22-cv-00789-SAG, Document 158, filed Apr. 7, 2025, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Porter et al. Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer. CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 45, No. 3 May/Jun. 1995, pp. 165-178. [cited by applicant]
Ragde et al. Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy. Urology 1988; vol. XXXII, No. 6, 503- 506. [cited by applicant]
Reply Non-final Office Action for Ex-parte Reexamination for U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257 , dated Jan. 28, 2025, 36 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Final Office Action for Ex-Parte Reexamination 90019257 , dated Oct. 3, 24, 16 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non- Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,335 dated May 12, 2025, 30 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non- Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,354 , Apr. 15, 2025, 108 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non- Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,354 , Apr. 16, 2025, 107 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non-Final Office Action for Ex-parte Reexamination 90019257 , dated Jun. 27, 2024, 91 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non-Final Office Action for Ex-Parte Reexamination 90019335, dated Dec. 10, 2024, 66 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non-Final Office Action for Ex-Parte Reexamination 90019354 , dated Nov. 14, 24, 66 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non-Final Office Action in Ex-Parte Re-Exam U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,335 dated May 12, 2025, 96 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Reply to Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,372, dated May 2025, 108 pages. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Application No. 11,096,762 , dated Mar. 10, 2025, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 10,064,681, dated Dec. 14, 2023, 76 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,096,762, dated Dec. 27, 2023, 43 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,246,677, dated Jan. 11, 2024, 64 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,446,056, dated Sep. 22, 2023, 77 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of U.S. Pat. No. 11,547,436, dated Sep. 20, 2024, 74 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,104, mailed on Apr. 16, 2020, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,104, mailed on Oct. 21, 2019, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/115,180, mailed on May 10, 2021, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,597, mailed on Apr. 22, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,597, mailed on Dec. 19, 2019, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,754, mailed on Apr. 16, 2020, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/377,754, mailed on Dec. 13, 2019, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Response to Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 17/314,845, mailed on Sep. 8, 2021, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,104, mailed on Jan. 22, 2019, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 14/874,104, mailed on Mar. 20, 2019, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ristau., et al., “Dutch Patent Litigation Document Exhibit MA-1 Free-Hand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Provides Acceptable Cancer Detection And Minimizes Risk Of Infection: Evolving Experience With A 10-Sector Template… [cited by applicant]
Smith J.B., et al., “Transperineal Sector Prostate Biopsies: A Local Anesthetic Outpatient Technique,” Oncology, Exhibit 2016, 2014, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Stroman L., et al., “A Cross-section of UK Prostate Cancer Diagnostics During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Era—A Shifting Paradigm,” BJU International, Exhibit 2019, 2021, vol. 127, pp. 30-34. [cited by applicant]
Supplemental Response to Non-Final Office Action for Ex-Parte Reexamination U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,257, dated Aug. 12, 2024, 11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Tamhankar A.S., et al., “The Clinical and Financial Implications of a Decade of Prostate Biopsies in the NHS: Analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics Data 2008-2019,” BJU International, Exhibit 2018, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Third Party Requester's Opposition to Patent Owner's Petition for Summary Termination of Reexamination for U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,673, filed Feb. 24, 2025, 20 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Third Party Requester's Opposition to Patent Owner's Petition for Summary Termination of Reexamination for U.S. Appl. No. 90/019,673, dated Feb. 24, 2025, 15 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, mailed on Apr. 15, 2022, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Noninfringement, Invalidity, and Violation of Georgia Law, mailed on Oct. 22, 2021, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Corrected Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, dated Apr. 18, 2022, 28 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Exhibit A-Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, dated Apr. 15, 2022, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Exhibit A-Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent Noninfringement and Invalidity, dated Jul. 20, 2022, 48 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Exhibit B-Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, dated Apr. 15, 2022, 17 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document, Exhibit C-Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims and Jury Demand, dated Apr. 15, 2022, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document Initial Disclosure of Infringement Contentions, dated Jun. 30, 2022, 235 Pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent Litigation Document Plaintiffs Initial Invalidity Contentions, dated Aug. 1, 2022, 103 pages. [cited by applicant]
USDC, District of Maryland, Defendant Corbin Clinical Resources, LLC Second Amended Initial Disclosure of Infringement Contentions and Claim Charts for Pat. Nos. 11,446,056 and 11,547,436, Case No. 1:22-cv-00789-SAG, fi… [cited by applicant]
USDC, District of Maryland, Plaintiff Advance Medical Designs, Inc.'s Updated Opening Claim Construction Brief, Case No. 1:22-cv-00789-SAG, filed Jul. 31, 2023, 39 pgs. [cited by applicant]
USPTO-PTAB, Decision Denying Institution of Post-Grant Review, [cited by applicant]
USPTO-PTAB, Patent Owner Preliminary Response to Post-Grant Review Petition, [cited by applicant]
USPTO-PTAB, Patent Owner Sur-Reply to Petitioner's Reply to Preliminary Response, [cited by applicant]
USPTO-PTAB Petition for Post-Grant Review, [cited by applicant]
USPTO-PTAB, Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, [cited by applicant]
Vereenigde Octrooiburea Ux N.V., Letter to EPO in support of Opposition of EP 3827779 filed by Opponent Advance Medical Design, Inc., dated Oct. 24, 2023, 70 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Vyas L., et al., “Indications, Results and Safety Profile of Transperineal Sector Biopsies (TPSB) Of the Prostate: A Single Centre Experience of 634 Cases,” NHS Foundation Trust, 2014, Exhibit 2014, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zangos S., et al., MR-Guided Transgluteal Biopsies with an Open Low-Field System in Patients with Clinically Suspected Prostate Cancer: Technique and Preliminary Results, 15 Euro Radiology 174, Sep. 4, 2004, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]