IP Library › Patent Application 19205998
Patent Application
App. No. 19/205,998

FINOPS GOVERNANCE MATURITY ASSESSMENT WITH A MULTI-CLOUD GOVERNANCE PLATFORM

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
19/205,998
Abstract

In one aspect, a method for assessing FinOps governance maturity in a multi-cloud environment is presented. The method begins with onboarding a cloud account to a multi-cloud governance platform. Following onboarding, the method involves pulling resources, resource utilizations, resource costs, budget data, and cloud provider recommendations from the cloud account. Next, a set of predefined policies is executed on the resources to identify optimization recommendations for each of the resources. Based on these optimization recommendations, a maturity score for the cloud account is calculated. The method then generates a FinOps governance maturity assessment report comprising the maturity score and the optimization recommendations. Finally, the FinOps governance maturity assessment report is provided to a user interface for display to the user.

Claims (39)

1 . A method for assessing FinOps governance maturity in a multi-cloud environment, the method comprising:

onboarding a cloud account to a multi-cloud governance platform;

pulling resources, resource utilizations, resource costs, budget data, and cloud provider recommendations from the cloud account;

executing a set of predefined policies on the resources to identify optimization recommendations for each of the resources;

calculating a maturity score for the cloud account based on the optimization recommendations;

generating a FinOps governance maturity assessment report comprising the maturity score and the optimization recommendations; and

providing the FinOps governance maturity assessment report to a user interface for display.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein executing the set of predefined policies on the resources comprises:

identifying underutilized resources for right-sizing based on resource utilization metrics;

identifying resource configuration optimizations based on resource configuration data;

identifying idle or orphaned resources for termination based on resource utilization metrics; and

determining appropriate scheduling for starting and stopping computing resources based on resource usage patterns.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

calculating potential cost savings for each of the optimization recommendations; and

including the potential cost savings in the FinOps governance maturity assessment report.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the maturity score for the cloud account comprises:

determining a percentage of potential cost savings relative to average monthly cost;

determining a percentage of violated resources relative to total resources assessed;

determining a percentage of budget violations relative to total budget scenarios assessed;

determining a percentage of untagged resources; and

calculating the maturity score using a weighted formula incorporating the percentage of potential cost savings, the percentage of violated resources, the percentage of budget violations, and the percentage of untagged resources.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the FinOps governance maturity assessment report comprises: an executive summary report providing a concise overview of visibility, recommendations, and operational guidelines; and a detailed recommendation report providing insights at a level of cloud services and policies.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

conducting periodic assessments of the cloud account at predetermined intervals;

storing historical maturity scores from the periodic assessments; and

including a comparison of current and historical maturity scores in the FinOps governance maturity assessment report.

7 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

detecting cost anomalies in the cloud account by comparing current spending patterns with historical spending patterns;

identifying root causes of the cost anomalies; and

including the cost anomalies and the root causes in the FinOps governance maturity assessment report.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the FinOps governance maturity assessment report comprises visualizations of: average monthly cost versus potential cost savings; cost visibility and savings by top services; cost visibility and savings by top resources; cost savings by top tags; and cost savings by assessment category.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

establishing configurable thresholds for cost anomaly sensitivity, idle thresholds, and right-size thresholds;

utilizing the configurable thresholds when executing the set of predefined policies on the resources; and

allowing a user to modify the configurable thresholds through the user interface.

10 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

consolidating optimization recommendations from multiple sources including cloud provider native recommendations and the multi-cloud governance platform recommendations;

ranking the optimization recommendations based on potential cost savings or impact; and

providing remediation actions for implementing the optimization recommendations in the FinOps governance maturity assessment report.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 30, 2025
From: CORESTACK, INC.; CORESTACK FEDERAL HOLDINGS, LLC; KARTHIK CONSULTING LLC; CLOUDIOLITE, INC
To: POST ROAD ADMINISTRATIVE LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 074140/0380 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 30, 2025
From: ARUMUGAM, SABAPATHY; CHOWDHURY, SATYABRAT; SOMASUNDARAM, KAMALA KANNAN
To: CORESTACK, INC.
Reel/Frame 072738/0826 →