CYBERSECURITY THREAT DETECTION AND MITIGATION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
In some implementations, a cybersecurity threat detection and mitigation system is provided. The system refines an artificial intelligence (AI) model with a corpus of historical data that represents security events that occurred, queries that were submitted by security analysts in response to the security events, and actions that were performed for mitigating the security events. Telemetry data that corresponds to behavior and performance of a computer network is collected and provided to the AI model. Based on the telemetry data, the AI model predicts a potential security threat to the computer network and performs an assessment of risk to the computer network. When the assessment of risk to the computer network indicates that the potential security threat is an actual security threat, a security alert that corresponds to the actual security threat is triggered. Other embodiments are described and claimed.
1 . A cybersecurity threat detection and mitigation system, comprising:
at least one processor; and
memory storing instructions that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the system to perform operations comprising:
refining an artificial intelligence (AI) model with a corpus of historical security data that represents security events that occurred across a computer network, queries that were submitted by security analysts in response to the security events, and actions that were performed for mitigating the security events;
collecting real-time telemetry data that corresponds to behavior and performance of the computer network;
providing the real-time telemetry data to the AI model;
analyzing, by the AI model, the real-time telemetry data in conjunction with the historical security data to identify a potential security threat to the computer network using multi-dimensional vector representations that encode threat characteristics, network behaviors, and mitigation effectiveness in interconnected subspaces;
performing, by the AI model, an assessment of risk to the computer network for the potential security threat; and
when the assessment of risk to the computer network indicates that the potential security threat is an actual security threat, triggering a security alert that corresponds to the actual security threat.
2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein performing the assessment of risk to the computer network comprises:
dynamically adjusting a threshold value based on network conditions and threat intelligence feeds through a continuous Bayesian optimization process incorporating time-decay functions for aging intelligence;
determining a risk value that corresponds to the potential security threat; and
comparing the risk value to the threshold value, wherein the potential security threat is indicated as an actual security threat when the determined risk value meets the threshold value.
3 . The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:
when the assessment of risk to the computer network indicates that the potential security threat is an actual security threat, determining, by the AI model, at least one automated mitigation action based on a type of the actual security threat; and
initiating the at least one automated mitigation action.
4 . The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:
predicting, by the AI model, at least one query for investigating the actual security threat by translating detection signals into investigation pathways; and
providing the predicted at least one query for presentation to a security analyst through a user interface with supporting evidence and confidence scores for each predicted query.
5 . The system of claim 4 , the operations further comprising:
receiving, through the user interface, a selection of the at least one query;
executing the at least one query, and returning a result based on the executing for presentation through the user interface;
providing, to the AI model, query selection data that indicates that the at least one question was selected;
receiving, through the user interface, a feedback response from the security analyst indicative of effectiveness of mitigation actions taken in response to the query results; and
incrementally refining the AI model based on the query selection data and the effectiveness of mitigation actions taken in response to the query results through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
6 . The system of claim 5 , the operations further comprising incrementally refining the AI model with a dual feedback loop combining the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF).
7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein refining the AI model comprises automatically restructuring a vector index for the multi-dimensional vector representations.
8 . The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:
prioritizing the security alert, based on (i) a potential impact of the potential security threat on an organization that operates the security network, (ii) a detection confidence that corresponds to a likelihood that the security alert is not a false positive or a false negative, and (iii) the potential lateral movement paths available to the threat actor based on network topology analysis.
9 . The system of claim 1 , wherein collecting the real-time telemetry data comprises:
receiving the real-time telemetry data through multiple different security threat feeds, each security threat feed having a different data format; and
outputting the real-time data in a common schema with standardized metadata tagging for cross-correlation across different data sources.
10 . The system of claim 1 , the operations further comprising:
in response to the security alert being an indicator of attack, issuing a ticket that corresponds to the actual security threat, by a ticketing system that is integrated with the cybersecurity threat detection and mitigation system; and
automatically assigning the ticket to an appropriate security team based on a threat classification and team expertise.
11 . A method for cybersecurity threat detection and mitigation, the method comprising:
refining, by a computing device, an artificial intelligence (AI) model with a corpus of historical security data that represents security events that occurred across a computer network, queries that were submitted by security analysts in response to the security events, and actions that were performed for mitigating the security events;
collecting, by the computing device, real-time telemetry data that corresponds to behavior and performance of the computer network;
providing, by the computing device, the real-time telemetry data to the AI model;
analyzing, by the AI model, the real-time telemetry data in conjunction with the historical security data to identify a potential security threat to the computer network using multi-dimensional vector representations that encode threat characteristics, network behaviors, and mitigation effectiveness in interconnected subspaces;
performing, by the AI model, an assessment of risk to the computer network for the potential security threat; and
when the assessment of risk to the computer network indicates that the potential security threat is an actual security threat, triggering, by the computing device, a security alert that corresponds to the actual security threat.
12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein performing the assessment of risk to the computer network comprises:
dynamically adjusting a threshold value based on network conditions and threat intelligence feeds through a continuous Bayesian optimization process incorporating time-decay functions for aging intelligence;
determining a risk value that corresponds to the potential security threat; and
comparing the risk value to the threshold value, wherein the potential security threat is indicated as an actual security threat when the determined risk value meets the threshold value.
13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
when the assessment of risk to the computer network indicates that the potential security threat is an actual security threat, determining, by the AI model, at least one automated mitigation action based on a type of the actual security threat; and
initiating, by the computing device, the at least one automated mitigation action.
14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:
predicting, by the AI model, at least one query for investigating the actual security threat by translating detection signals into investigation pathways; and
providing, by the computing device, the predicted at least one query for presentation to a security analyst through a user interface with supporting evidence and confidence scores for each predicted query.
15 . The method of claim 14 , further comprising:
receiving, by the computing device through the user interface, a selection of the at least one query;
executing, by the computing device, the at least one query, and returning a result based on the executing for presentation through the user interface;
providing, by the computing device to the AI model, query selection data that indicates that the at least one question was selected;
receiving, by the computing device through the user interface, a feedback response from the security analyst indicative of effectiveness of mitigation actions taken in response to the query results; and
incrementally refining, by the computing device, the AI model based on the query selection data and the effectiveness of mitigation actions taken in response to the query results through Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
16 . The method of claim 15 , further comprising incrementally refining, by the computing device, the AI model with a dual feedback loop combining the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) with Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback (RLAIF).
17 . The system of claim 1 , wherein refining the AI model comprises automatically restructuring a vector index for the multi-dimensional vector representations.
18 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:
prioritizing, by the computing device, the security alert, based on (i) a potential impact of the potential security threat on an organization that operates the security network, and (ii) a detection confidence that corresponds to a likelihood that the security alert is not a false positive or a false negative and (iii) the potential lateral movement paths available to the threat actor based on network topology analysis.
19 . The method of claim 11 , wherein collecting the real-time telemetry data comprises:
receiving the real-time telemetry data through multiple different security threat feeds, each security threat feed having a different data format; and
outputting the real-time data in a common schema with standardized metadata tagging for cross-correlation across different data sources.
20 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:
in response to the security alert being an indicator of attack, issuing a ticket that corresponds to the actual security threat, by a ticketing system that is integrated with the cybersecurity threat detection and mitigation system; and
automatically assigning the ticket to an appropriate security team based on a threat classification and team expertise.