IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,721,353
Granted Patent B1
US 12,721,353 · App. 19/322,342 · Granted Sep 1, 2026

System and method for detecting ink marking and ejecting carcass from line

Inventors: Luke Townsend (King City, MO); Jeremy McFarlane (Clarksdale, MO); Matthew England (Kansas City, MO); Kenneth Grannas, III (St. Joseph, MO); Nicholas Huffman (Helena, MO); Emily Arkfeld (St. Joseph, MO)
Assignee: TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC
A22C17/008B07C5/3422B07C2501/0081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,721,353
App. No.
19/322,342
Granted
Sep 1, 2026
Kind
B1
Abstract

The disclosure relates to methods and systems for identifying ink on an animal carcass, or a portion thereof, using an ink detection model. In one embodiment, the methods and systems disclosed herein use automated methods to determine an objective evaluation of an animal carcass, or a portion thereof, based on the presence or absence of ink on the animal carcass, or a portion thereof. Methods and systems disclosed herein comprise processing one or more images of the animal carcass, or a portion thereof, captured with one or more data capture devices, and using the ink detection model to determine whether the carcass is marked with ink or not.

Claims (55)

1 . An ink detection system designed to detect ink on an animal carcass comprising:

a transport system designed to move the animal carcass through a meat processing facility;

a data capture device designed to capture one or more images of the animal carcass as it moves on the transport system;

an ink detection model including at least one processor and a memory unit with programmable instructions that when executed cause the at least one processor to:

receive an image of the one or more images received from the data capture device;

isolate a plurality of pixels of the image that are within a specified color range associated with the ink being detected;

count a number of pixels that are within the specified color range;

divide the number of pixels that are within the specified color range from the number of pixels in the image to get a ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range;

determine if the ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than a threshold value consistent with a carcass marked with ink; and

activate a controller in communication with a processing unit configured to remove the animal carcass when the ratio of colored pixels is greater than the threshold value.

2 . The ink detection system of claim 1 further comprising an ejection device that removes the animal carcass from a first section of the transport system and onto a second section of the transport system when the ratio of colored pixels is greater than the threshold value.

3 . The ink detection system of claim 1 , wherein the ink detection model is designed to identify a color value, wherein the specified color range corresponds to the color value.

4 . The ink detection system of claim 1 , wherein the animal carcass is identified as being marked when the ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than the threshold value.

5 . The ink detection system of claim 4 , wherein the ink detection model further causes the processor to save the image associated with a marked animal carcass to the memory unit.

6 . The ink detection system of claim 1 , wherein the data capture device is provided in the form of an RGB camera.

7 . The ink detection system of claim 1 , wherein the ink detection model further causes the processor to:

convert the image to a color format prior to isolating the plurality of pixels.

8 . The ink detection system of claim 7 , wherein isolating the plurality of pixels includes creating a mask of any pixel value that is between an upper color format value and a lower color format value selected as the specified color range and applying the mask over the image.

9 . A method for identifying an animal carcass marked with ink using an ink detection model, the method comprising:

transporting the animal carcass using a transport system;

triggering a data capture device as the animal carcass moves on the transport system;

processing an image of the animal carcass captured by the data capture device using at least one processor of the ink detection model;

determining an objective evaluation of the animal carcass by identifying a presence or absence of the ink from a plurality of pixels of an image that are within a specified color range associated with the ink being detected on the animal carcass;

determining if a ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than a threshold value associated with the ink being detected; and

activating a controller in communication with a processing unit configured to remove the animal carcass when the presence of the ink is identified on the animal carcass.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein processing the image of the animal carcass includes:

converting the image to a color format; and

isolating a plurality of pixels of the image by creating a mask of any pixel value that is between an upper color format value and a lower color format value selected as a specified color range and applying the mask over the image.

11 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

focus the image on a particular area of interest being evaluated.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein determining an objective evaluation of the animal carcass includes:

counting a number of pixels that are within the specified color range in the image;

dividing the number of pixels that are within the specified color range from the number of pixels in the image to get a ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range;

determining if the ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than a threshold value;

identifying the animal carcass as a marked animal carcass if the ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than the threshold value; and

identifying the animal carcass as a good animal carcass if the ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is less than the threshold value.

13 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

saving the image associated with the marked animal carcass to a memory unit.

14 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the processing unit removes the animal carcass from a first section of the transport system onto a second section of the transport system.

15 . The method of claim 12 , wherein the ink detection model is designed to identify a color value, wherein the specified color range corresponds to the color value.

16 . The method of claim 9 further comprising:

generating a notification using a notification system, wherein the notification can include an output of the ink detection model.

17 . An ink detection system designed to detect ink on an animal carcass comprising:

a transport system designed to move the animal carcass;

a data capture device designed to capture one or more images of the animal carcass as it moves on the transport system;

an ink detection model including at least one processor and a memory unit with programmable instructions that when executed cause the at least one processor to:

receive an image of the one or more images received from the data capture device;

process the image of the animal carcass and isolate a plurality of pixels of the image that are within a specified color range associated with the ink being detected;

determine an objective evaluation of the animal carcass by identifying a presence or absence of the ink on the animal carcass if a ratio of colored pixels within the specified color range is greater than a threshold value associated with the ink being detected; and

activate a microcontroller to initiate an ejection device when the presence of the ink is identified on the animal carcass.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein processing the image of the animal carcass includes the ink detection model causing the processor to further:

convert the image to a color format; and

isolate a plurality of pixels of the image by creating a mask of any pixel value that is between an upper color format value and a lower color format value selected as a specified color range and applying the mask over the image.

19 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the ejection device removes the animal carcass from a first section of the transport system onto a second section of the transport system.

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the ink detection model is designed to identify a color value, wherein the specified color range corresponds to the color value.

Assignments (2)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 4TH ASSIGNORS NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 72482 FRAME: 863. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. Recorded Oct 31, 2025
From: TOWNSEND, LUKE; MCFARLANE, JEREMY; ENGLAND, MATTHEW; GRANNAS, KENNETH, III; HUFFMAN, NICHOLAS; ARKFELD, EMILY
To: TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC
Reel/Frame 073461/0233 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 6, 2025
From: TOWNSEND, LUKE; MCFARLANE, JEREMY; ENGLAND, MATTHEW; GRANNAS, KENNETH, ILL; HUFFMAN, NICHOLAS; ARKFELD, EMILY
To: TRIUMPH FOODS, LLC
Reel/Frame 072482/0863 →
References Cited (29)
US 5194036A · Chevalier · 1993 [cited by examiner]
US 5694228A · Peairs · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 9014434B2 · Bajema et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10285408B2 · Schimitzek · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11337432B1 · Tao et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20020067797A1 · Safai · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20030072472A1 · Haagensen · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20110117025A1 · Dacosta · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20140147015A1 · Bajema et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160327538A1 · La Valle Sansone · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170236281A1 · Dacosta · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190000094A1 · Hjalmarsson et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190313654A1 · Healey et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200055678A1 · Shaw et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210035276A1 · Ago et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210121922A1 · Schmidt et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220058571A1 · Edwards et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220095631A1 · Anders · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230214982A1 · Michel et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230316481A1 · Ngadi · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CA 2111937C · 2000 [cited by examiner]
CN 114885973A · 2022 [cited by examiner]
DE 10054295A1 · 2002 [cited by examiner]
JP 2023044192A · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 102565570B1 · 2023 [cited by examiner]
NZ 334675A · 2000 [cited by examiner]
RU 2728231C1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2005099460A1 · 2005 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2022066736A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]