IP Library › Granted Patent US 6,919,566
Granted Patent B1
US 6,919,566 · App. 10/049,699 · Granted Jul 19, 2005

Method of calibrating a spectroscopic device

Assignee: NIR Diagnostics Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 6,919,566
App. No.
10/049,699
Granted
Jul 19, 2005
Kind
B1
Abstract

The present invention provides a method of calibrating a spectroscopic device for providing a non-invasive measurement of an analyte level in a sample. The method comprises the steps of: (a) providing a plurality of calibration algorithms; (b) taking a set of non-invasive measurements on said sample with said spectroscopic device; (c) calculating a predicted set of analyte levels for each of the calibration algorithms in response to the set of non-invasive measurements, each of the predicted sets of analyte levels being characterized by a variability range, a slope, an R 2 (a square of the correlation between said set of non-invasive measurements and said predicted set of analyte levels), and a standard error of prediction; and (d) selecting an appropriate calibration algorithm by using a suitability score based on the variability range, the slope, the R 2 an the standard error of prediction for each of the predicted sets of analyte levels. A method of generating suitable calibration algorithms in step (a) is also provided.

Claims (23)

1. A method of calibrating a spectroscopic device for providing a non-invasive measurement of an analyte level in a sample, comprising:

(a) providing a plurality of calibration algorithms;

(b) taking a set of non-invasive measurements on said sample with said spectroscopic device;

(c) calculating a predicted set of analyte levels for each of the calibration algorithms in response to the set of non-invasive measurements, each of the predicted sets of analyte levels being characterized by a variability range, a slope, an R 2 (a square of the correlation coefficient between a reference value set and said predicted set of analyte levels), and a standard error of prediction; and

(d) selecting an appropriate calibration algorithm comprising the steps selected from the group consisting of:

(1) calculating a suitability score according to the slope, the R 2 and the standard error of prediction for said predicted set;

(2) selecting the calibration algorithm corresponding to said predicted set having the highest suitability score as the appropriate calibration algorithm;

wherein in said predicted sets of analyte levels the standard error of prediction is less than an upper error limit, wherein the variability range is greater than a lower range limit, and wherein the slope is between a lower slope limit and an upper slope limit, said lower and upper slope limits defining an acceptable slope range; and

(3) selecting the calibration algorithm corresponding to the predicted set having the lowest standard error of prediction as the appropriate calibration algorithm: wherein in said predicted sets of analyte levels, the variability range is lower than the lower range limit and wherein the standard error of prediction is less than the upper error limit;

(e) declaring that no calibration algorithm is appropriate if no calibration algorithm is selected in step (d)(1), or step (d)(2).

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein, said acceptable slope range is subdivided into a plurality of subranges corresponding to a plurality of levels, comprising a first level and one or more subsequent levels, and if no predicted sets are selected in the first level, then repeating step (d)(1) at each subsequent level until a predicted set is selected or there are no more subsequent levels.

3. A method according to claim 2 , wherein, said acceptable slope range is defined by a lower slope limit of about 0.3 an upper slope limit of about 1.05.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein, said lower slope limit is less than one and said upper slope limit is greater than one.

5. A method according to claim 4 wherein, said lower slope limit is about 0.3 and said upper slope limit is about 1.05.

6. A method according to claim 1 wherein, the plurality of calibration algorithms provided in step (a) are first generated by the steps of:

(i) compiling non-invasive and corresponding reference data sets of measurements of analyte levels for each of a number of samples;

(ii) rejecting data sets that are not suitable for calibration;

(iii) combining data sets that are suitable for calibration into a plurality of groups depending on whether correlations of the combined data sets meet predetermined criteria; and

(iv) generating a calibration algorithm for each of the groups of data sets.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the predetermined criteria in step (iii) include minimizing correlations of the combined data sets in a particular group with parameters other than said analyte and maximizing the correlation between data sets in a particular group.

8. A method according to claim 6 wherein steps (iii) and (iv) are performed using partial least-squares regression analysis.

9. A method according to claim 6 wherein steps (a), (c), and (d) are performed on a computer associated with the spectroscopic device.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the sample is an individual patient, the spectroscopic device is a near-infrared spectrophotometer, and the analyte is selected from the group consisting of glucose, hemoglobin, albumin, cholesterol, and ethanol.

Assignments (7)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2012
From: NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT LLC
To: COVIDIEN LP
Reel/Frame 029432/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 14, 2011
From: NIRESULTS, INC.
To: NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT LLC
Reel/Frame 027064/0516 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2009
From: NIR DIAGNOSTICS INC.
To: NIRESULTS INC.
Reel/Frame 022473/0568 →
LICENSE TERMINATION Recorded Sep 12, 2008
From: NIR DIAGNOSTICS INC.
To: NIR DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Reel/Frame 021523/0155 →
EXCLUSIVE LICENSE Recorded Apr 9, 2007
From: NIR DIAGNOSTICS INC.
To: SHAKLEE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019140/0111 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 19, 2005
From: CME TELEMETRIX INC.
To: NIR DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Reel/Frame 016478/0446 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2002
From: CADELL, THEODORE
To: CME TELEMETRIX INC.
Reel/Frame 013024/0926 →
Continuity (1)
Provisional Application 6015153600 · Aug 31, 1999