IP Library Granted Patent US 7,184,584
Granted Patent B2
US 7,184,584 · App. 10/482,159 · Granted Feb 27, 2007

Method for qualitatively evaluating material

Assignee: Koenig & Bauer Aktiengesellschaft
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,184,584
App. No.
10/482,159
Granted
Feb 27, 2007
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for qualitatively evaluating material with at least one identification characteristic, whose position can vary within an expectation range designated by tolerance limits, involves the use of at least one illuminating device, at least one photoelectric sensor and an evaluating device. At least one background reference value and at least one mask reference are stored in the evaluating device. The background reference represents the characteristics of a printed image, particularly the gray scale value, in at least one portion which surrounds the identification characteristic. The mask reference represents the geometrical contour of the identification characteristic. During inspection of the printed material, differential image data is found, at least from the expectation range, from the actual image data, and from the background reference value in the evaluating device. The actual position of the identification characteristic is subsequently derived in the evaluating device.

Claims (43)

1. A method for qualitatively evaluating a material including;

providing at least one identification characteristic on a material to be evaluated;

providing an evaluation device;

determining at least one background reference value representing properties of a material to be evaluated in at least a part of a surrounding area of a material to be evaluated extending around said at least one identification characteristic;

providing at least one mask reference representing one of a geometric outline of said at least one identification characteristic and a relative arrangement of said at least one identification characteristic and a second identification characteristic;

storing said at least one background reference value and said at least one mask reference in said evaluation device;

inspecting a material to be evaluated and determining actual image data of the material to be evaluated;

forming a difference image using said actual image value and said background reference value;

comparing said difference image and said at least one mask reference in said evaluation device and determining an actual position of said identification characteristic of a material to be evaluated; and

using said actual position of said identification characteristics and blanking out areas of a material to be evaluated corresponding to said determined location of said actual position of said identification characteristic in a subsequent qualitative evaluation of a material to be evaluated.

2. A method for qualitatively evaluating a material including;

providing at least one identification characteristic on a material to be evaluated;

providing an evaluation device;

determining at least one background reference value representing properties of a material to be evaluated in at least a part of an area of a material to be evaluated extending around said at least one identification characteristic;

providing at least one mask reference representing one of a geometric outline of said at least one identification characteristic and a relative arrangement of said at least one identification characteristic and a second identification characteristic;

storing said at least one background reference value and said at least one mask reference in said evaluation device;

inspecting a material to be evaluated and determining actual image data of the material to be evaluated;

forming a difference image using said actual image value and said background reference value;

comparing said difference image and said at least one mask reference in said evaluation device and determining an actual position of said identification characteristic of a material to be evaluated;

projecting each of said at least one mask reference and said difference image onto at least one projection line; and

deriving said actual position of said identification characteristic in a linear direction of said projection line by comparing projection data of said mask reference and said difference image.

3. The method of claim 2 further including blanking out an area of a material to be evaluated using said actual position of said identification characteristic in a subsequent evaluation step for the qualitative evaluation of a material to be imprinted.

4. The method of claim 1 further including locating said at least one identification characteristic within an area of expectation defined by tolerance limits.

5. The method of claim 2 further including locating said at least one identification characteristic within an area of expectation defined by tolerance limits.

6. The method of claim 1 further including storing a digitizing threshold in said evaluation unit and filtering out all image data having values lying below said digitizing threshold.

7. The method of claim 2 further including storing a digitizing threshold in said evaluation unit and filtering out all image data having values lying below said digitizing threshold.

8. The method of claim 1 further including shifting said mask reference and determining a maximum congruence between said mask reference and said difference image in response to said shifting of said mask reference.

9. The method of claim 2 further including shifting said mask reference and determining a maximum congruence between said mask reference and said difference image in response to said shifting of said mask reference.

10. The method of claim 8 further including calculating a concentration of an optical distribution of image points of said mask reference and a concentration of an optical distribution of image points of said difference image and comparing said concentrations for determining said maximum congruence.

11. The method of claim 9 further including calculating a concentration of an optical distribution of image points of said mask reference and a concentration of an optical distribution of image points of said difference image and comparing said concentrations for determining said maximum congruence.

12. The method of claim 10 further including determining said maximum congruence when a minimum deviation results from comparing said concentrations of said mask reference and said difference image.

13. The method of claim 10 further including determining said maximum congruence when a minimum deviation results from comparing said concentrations of said mask reference and said difference image.

14. The method of claim 1 further including providing said identification characteristic in a strip shape.

15. The method of claim 2 further including providing said identification characteristic in a strip shape.

16. The method of claim 1 further including embodying said identification characteristic as a security characteristic of a bank note.

17. The method of claim 2 further including embodying said identification characteristic as a security characteristic of a bank note.

18. The method of claim 16 further including selecting said security characteristic as one of a window thread, a perforated window thread, a hologram and a kinegram.

19. The method of claim 17 further including selecting said security characteristic as one of a window thread, a perforated window thread, a hologram and a kinegram.

20. The method of claim 1 further including determining background reference values for different areas of a material to be evaluated.

21. The method of claim 2 further including determining background reference values for different areas of a material to be evaluated.

22. The method of claim 1 further including projecting each of said at least one mask reference and said difference image onto at least one projection line, and deriving said actual position of said identification characteristic in a linear direction of said at least one projection line by comparing projection data of said mask reference and said difference image.

23. The method of claim 1 further including performing an evaluation of a material in said evaluation device using mathematical operations of digitized input data.

24. The method of claim 2 further including performing an evaluation of a material in said evaluation device using mathematical operations of digitized input data.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 28, 2015
From: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: KOENIG & BAUER AG
Reel/Frame 036987/0915 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 5, 2004
From: SACHER, JORN; WILLEKE, HARALD HEINRICH
To: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 015367/0783 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 101 32 589 · Jul 5, 2001 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20040179724A1 · Sep 16, 2004