Real time image quality analysis and verification

1. A configurable image quality analysis system for use at a point of presentment, comprising:

at least one processor having;

an input at the point of presentment receptive of an image of a physical item at least partially embodying a financial transaction;

an image quality module adapted to perform a plurality of image quality tests in real time on the image according to a plurality of configurable test parameters to identify a poor quality image;

an edit module adapted to perform at least one edit in real time on the poor quality image to generate an edited image; and

an output adapted to report in real time at least one of the edited image and a report of results from the plurality of quality tests of the image quality module.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the edited image is stored in a transaction datastore.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the report is stored in a transaction datastore.

4. The system of claim 1 , further comprising a workflow module adapted to sequence the plurality of image quality tests.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the workflow module is further adapted to configure an image display parameter.

6. The system of claim 1 , further comprising an image usability module adapted to configure and extract a test field from the image, and wherein the usability test fields are used to determine an acceptance state based upon the presence of the test field on the image.

7. The system of claim 6 , further comprising a data and image integrity module adapted to determine a validation state based upon a comparison of visual data extracted from the image with a validation characteristic.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the data and image integrity module is further adapted to retrieve the validation characteristics from a datastore.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the image quality module performs at least one image test function selected from the group consisting of a partial image test, excessive skew test, piggyback image test, too light test, too dark test, streaks test, bands test, exceeds minimum size test and maximum size test.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the edit module performs at least one image edit function selected from the group consisting of border detection, filtering, cropping, rotation, annotation, framing, scaling, and image conversion.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising determining validation state based on a comparison of visual data extracted from the item image with a validation characteristic.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the validation characteristic is retrieved from a datastore.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the physical item is received from a first user, the at least one edit is performed based on input from a second user, and the second user receives the output.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first user is located at the point of presentment and the second user is remote from the point of presentment.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the physical item is received from a first user, the at least one edit is performed based on input from the first user, and the first user receives the output.

16. A method comprising:

at least one processor performing the following:

retrieving a job profile from a datastore, wherein the job profile includes a set of document identifiers and a set of image quality test parameters;

generating an image record in real time of a physical item at least partially embodying a financial transaction, the physical item being received at a point of presentment;

performing an image quality test on the image record in real time based on the set of image quality test parameters to determine an image quality state;

selectively editing the image record in real time based on the image quality state to create a corrected image record;

posting at least one of the image quality test results and the corrected image record to a screen for viewing in real time; and

selectively extracting data from the corrected image record according to the set of document identifiers in real time.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising configuring a workflow parameter to sequence execution of the at least one imagine quality test.

18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising configuring work flow parameters to display the image quality test results and the corrected image record.

19. The method of claim 16 , further comprising posting the image quality test results and the corrected image record to a transaction datastore.

20. The method of claim 16 , further comprising determining an acceptance state based the presence of a usability test field in the image record.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the acceptance state is retrieved from a datastore.

22. The method of claim 16 , wherein performing at least one image quality test includes at least one test selected from the group consisting of partial image test, excessive skew test, piggyback image test, too light test, too dark test, streaks test, bands test, exceeds minimum size test and maximum size test.

23. The method of claim 16 , editing the flared image includes at least one editing function selected from the group consisting of deskewing, adding annotation, framing, scaling, and converting the flawed image.

24. The method of claim 16 , wherein the physical item is truncated from the financial transaction based on the image quality state.

25. The method of claim 16 , wherein the physical item is received from a first user, the image record is edited based on input from a second user, and the screen is viewed by the second user.

26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the first user is located at the point of presentment and the second user is remote from the point of presentment.

27. The method of claim 16 , wherein the physical item is received from a first user, the image record is edited based on input from the first user, and the screen is viewed by the first user.