IP Library Granted Patent US 7,894,776
Granted Patent B2
US 7,894,776 · App. 11/749,839 · Granted Feb 22, 2011

Correction method for a metric measurement of the quality of transmission in a communication system and device implementing the method

Assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,894,776
App. No.
11/749,839
Granted
Feb 22, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention proposes a study of how the inaccurate knowledge of the propagation conditions and interferences and noise, affecting the received signal of a radio transmission, affects the reception and a measurement model used to estimate the quality of the transmission, in a digital radio signal receiver. Actual means to correct the measurement model and improve the accuracy of the estimation of the error rate, or any other indicator of the quality of the transmission, are proposed along with a device comprising such means.

Claims (22)

1. A method, implemented on a communication system including an emitter and a receiver, to evaluate an indicator of a quality of data transmission from the emitter to the receiver through a communication channel, from an estimation of an error rate, comprising:

estimating a set of values ({S n }) relative to propagation conditions and interference and noise affecting the communication channel during actual data transmission;

estimating an error rate (FER e ) affecting the data transmission from this set of values according to a given quality model;

correcting, in the quality model, errors made in the estimation of the set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel by determining an adjustment parameter calculated from a simulation in which a difference between an estimated error rate and a true error rate are determined, and incorporating the adjustment parameter into the quality model for estimation of the error rate (FER e ).

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the correcting further includes applying to at least some of the values a correction function.

3. The method according to claim 2 where the correction function of a value, called X, giving the cumulative distribution function of said value based on an exact estimation of said set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel, called F, giving the cumulative distribution function of said value based on an error prone estimation of said set of values relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel, called {circumflex over (F)}, consists of applying to the measured value X the correction function F −1 ({circumflex over (F)}(X)) to get a corrected value of X.

4. The method according to claim 3 where said correction function is applied to each of the values of said set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel.

5. The method according to claim 3 where said correction function is applied to an effective measured value (S eff ) obtained by applying a compression function (f c ) to said set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel.

6. The method according to claim 3 where said correction function is applied to the result of the estimated error rate (FER e ).

7. The method according to claim 3 where said correction function is applied to an indicator of the quality of the transmission computed from the estimated error rate.

8. A communication system comprising:

an emitter that transmits data through a communication channel to a receiver;

said receiver that receives the transmitted data;

an evaluation unit that evaluates an indicator of the quality of the transmission including:

a first estimation unit that estimates a set of values ({S n }) relative to propagation conditions and interference and noise affecting the communication channel during actual data transmission;

a second estimation unit that estimates an error rate (FER e ) affecting the data transmission from this set of values according to a given quality model; and

a correction unit that corrects errors made in the estimation of the set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel by determining an adjustment parameter calculated from a simulation in which a difference between an estimated error rate and a true error rate are determined, and incorporating the adjustment parameter into the quality model for estimation of the error rate (FER e ).

9. A device in a communication system which includes an emitter and a receiver, the device comprising:

an evaluation unit that evaluates an indicator of a quality of a transmission from the emitter to the receiver, the evaluation unit including:

a first estimation unit that estimates a set of values ({S n }) relative to propagation conditions and interference and noise affecting the communication channel during actual data transmission;

a second estimation unit that estimates an error rate (FER e ) affecting the data transmission from this set of values according to a given quality model; and

a correction that corrects errors made in the estimation of the set of values ({S n }) relative to the propagation conditions and the interference and noise affecting the communication channel by determining an adjustment parameter calculated from a simulation in which a difference between an estimated error rate and a true error rate are determined, and incorporating the adjustment parameter into the quality model for estimation of the error rate (FER e ).

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2007
From: MOURAD, ABDEL-MAJID
To: MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019620/0758 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 06290826 · May 19, 2006 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070270101A1 · Nov 22, 2007