IP Library Granted Patent US 8,189,900
Granted Patent B2
US 8,189,900 · App. 13/047,591 · Granted May 29, 2012

Image-based methods for measuring global nuclear patterns as epigenetic markers of cell differentiation

Assignees: Tha Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.; University of Pittsburgh-of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,189,900
App. No.
13/047,591
Granted
May 29, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides methods for determining the differentiation state of cells. The methods include non-invasive, non-perturbing, automatable, and quantitative methods of analysis of cell colonies, individual cells, and/or cellular structures.

Claims (28)

1. A method for identifying viscoelastic phase transitions of test cells, comprising:

(a) obtaining images of one or more test cells over a period of time;

(b) measuring one or more feature dynamics of the test cells in the images;

(c) using a processor to model the one or more feature dynamics as a function of time; and

(d) comparing models of feature dynamics from the test cells with models of feature dynamics derived from reference cells at reference viscoelastic phases;

whereby the viscoelastic phase transitions in the test cells are determined.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the phase transitions represent transitions between distinct phases of the test cells.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein test cells are deformable in a first viscoelastic phase and transition to a solid-like state in a second viscoelastic phase.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the phase transitions are transitions between one or more states of chromatin condensation.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein test cells in a first state of chromatin condensation with a diffuse chromatin structure transition to a second state of chromatin condensation with a dense chromatin structure.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the phase transitions are transitions between states characterized by expression levels of markers in the test cells.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein test cells in a first state express high levels of markers NAP1 and ASF1 and transition to a second state in which the test cells express low levels of NAP1 and ASF1.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more test cells is a colony of cells.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising varying environmental conditions over the period of time in step (a).

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the environmental conditions are at least one of temperature, humidity, O 2 levels, and composition of culture media in which test cells grow.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more feature dynamics is a change in a level or a distribution of one or more proteins in the test cell.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more feature dynamics is shape variation.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more feature dynamics is elasticity of a nucleus in the test cell.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more feature dynamics is a colony feature dynamic.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the colony feature dynamic is at least one of colony texture and nuclear dynamics.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more feature dynamics varies according to the differentiation state of the test cell.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein using a processor to model the one or more feature dynamics comprises modeling the feature dynamics at two levels.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the two levels are lower levels and higher levels.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the feature dynamics are modeled as a function of time in the lower level.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the feature dynamics change over time in response to environmental conditions.

21. The method of claim 20 , comprising representing feature dynamics as a power spectrum.

22. The method of claim 18 , wherein phase transitions are modeled in the higher level.

23. The method of claim 17 , further comprising determining changes in the feature dynamics from step (c) as a function of the environmental conditions, and optionally adjusting environmental conditions on the basis of feature dynamics.

Assignments (3)
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jan 31, 2013
From: CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY
To: NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT
Reel/Frame 029731/0995 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2011
From: MANGOUBI, RAMI; DESAI, MUKUND; LOWRY, NATHAN
To: THE CHARLES STARK DRAPER LABORATORY, INC.
Reel/Frame 026515/0274 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 16, 2011
From: SAMMAK, PAUL J.; ERB, TERESA M.
To: UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Reel/Frame 026454/0386 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 12321360 · Jan 16, 2009
Continuation In Part 11128612 · May 13, 2005
Provisional Application 60570650 · May 13, 2004
Provisional Application 61011456 · Jan 16, 2008
Provisional Application 61021513 · Jan 16, 2008
Provisional Application 61143399 · Jan 8, 2009
Related Publication 20110206262A1 · Aug 25, 2011