IP Library Granted Patent US 8,249,692
Granted Patent B2
US 8,249,692 · App. 10/830,731 · Granted Aug 21, 2012

Method and device for image optimization in ultrasound recordings

Assignee: Brainlab AG
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,249,692
App. No.
10/830,731
Granted
Aug 21, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A device for positioning at least one ultrasound probe of an ultrasound apparatus can include a recording device for recording an object and an evaluating unit that evaluates data corresponding to the object obtained from the recording device. A computational unit can generate positional data for the at least one ultrasound probe of the ultrasound apparatus. The device can be used for setting at least one parameter of the ultrasound apparatus based on data obtained by the recording device.

Claims (30)

1. A computer program stored on a non-transitory machine-readable medium, wherein when the program is loaded onto a memory of a computer and executed, causes the computer to:

receive non-ultrasound patient data from a non-ultrasound recording device;

receive position data related to a position of an ultrasound apparatus relative to a patient;

evaluate the non-ultrasound patient data; and

generate and dynamically update a value of at least one ultrasound imaging parameter based on the non-ultrasound patient data and the received ultrasound position value to optimize an ultrasound image based on the position of the ultrasound apparatus relative to the patient, the at least one ultrasound imaging parameter including a parameter other than a position of the ultrasound apparatus.

2. The computer program as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes color, depth, depth gain compensation and/or dynamic range.

3. The computer program as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes contour, focus and/or image rate/line density.

4. The computer program as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes frequency, amplification, grey scales, offset, transmitting output and/or correlation.

5. The computer program as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes post-processing curves for grey scales, sector angle, image width, type of sound heard and/or zoom.

6. A device for setting at least one parameter of an ultrasound apparatus, the device comprising:

a computer comprising memory; and

a computer program stored in the memory, wherein when executed by the computer the program causes the computer to:

receive non-ultrasound patient data from a non-ultrasound recording device;

receive position data related to a position of an ultrasound apparatus relative to a patient;

evaluate the non-ultrasound patient data; and

generate and dynamically update a value of at least one ultrasound imaging parameter based on the non-ultrasound patient data and the received ultrasound position value to optimize an ultrasound image based on the position of the ultrasound apparatus relative to the patient, the at least one ultrasound imaging parameter including a parameter other than a position of the ultrasound apparatus.

7. A system comprising the device set forth in claim 6 and a non-ultrasound recording device.

8. The system as set forth in claim 7 , wherein the non-ultrasound recording device includes an (i) MRI, (ii) CT, (iii) PET, (iv) SPECT or (v) fluoroscopy recording device.

9. The system according to claim 7 , further comprising:

a navigation system;

an ultrasound apparatus including a probe; and

parameter data sets stored in memory and corresponding to body structures of the patient, wherein based on a selected parameter of the parameter data sets, the probe is positioned on the patient using the navigation system.

10. A computer program stored on a non-transitory machine-readable medium, wherein when the program is loaded onto a memory of a computer and executed, the program causes the computer to, in response to receipt of non-ultrasound patient data from a non-ultrasound recording device and position data related to a position of an ultrasound apparatus relative to a patient:

evaluate the non-ultrasound patient data; and

generate and dynamically update a value of at least one ultrasound imaging parameter based on the non-ultrasound patient data and the received ultrasound position value to optimize an ultrasound image based on the position of the ultrasound apparatus relative to the patient, the at least one ultrasound imaging parameter including a parameter other than a position of the ultrasound apparatus.

11. The computer program as set forth in claim 10 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes color, depth, depth gain compensation and/or dynamic range.

12. The computer program as set forth in claim 10 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes contour, focus and/or image rate/line density.

13. The computer program as set forth in claim 10 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes frequency, amplification, grey scales, offset, transmitting output and/or correlation.

14. The computer program as set forth in claim 10 , wherein the ultrasound imaging parameter includes post-processing curves for grey scales, sector angle, image width, type of sound heard and/or zoom.

15. The computer program as set forth in claim 10 , wherein the non-ultrasound patient data comprises patient image data.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 24, 2026
From: BRAINLAB AG
To: BRAINLAB SE
Reel/Frame 073877/0190 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 24, 2004
From: VILSMEIER, STEFAN; SCHMIDT, ROBERT; PFAFFLE, ALEXANDER
To: BRAINLAB AG
Reel/Frame 014664/0733 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 03008841 · Apr 25, 2003 · regional
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60489754 · Jul 24, 2003
Related Publication 20040215073A1 · Oct 28, 2004