IP Library Granted Patent US 8,463,314
Granted Patent B2
US 8,463,314 · App. 13/418,379 · Granted Jun 11, 2013

Power control in schedulable wireless communication terminal

Inventors: Robert T. Love (Barrington, IL); Brian K. Classon (Palatine, IL); Edgar P. Fernandes (Winchester, GB); Armin W. Klomsdorf (Libertyville, IL); Vijay Nangia (Algonquin, IL); Ravikiran Nory (Grayslake, IL); Dale G. Schwent (Schaumburg, IL); Kenneth A. Stewart (Grayslake, IL); David R. Wilson (Hainsville, IL)
Assignee: Motorola Mobility LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,463,314
App. No.
13/418,379
Granted
Jun 11, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A wireless communication entity schedulable in a wireless communication network includes a radio receiver that receives radio resource assignment information including a bandwidth allocation, and a controller communicably coupled to the power amplifier, wherein the controller varies an operational maximum power level of the schedulable wireless communication entity in accordance with a protocol state governing the schedulable wireless communication entity, wherein the operational maximum power level limits an instantaneous power at which the schedulable wireless communication entity may transmit on the radio resource assigned.

Claims (32)

1. A method in a schedulable wireless communication entity having an operational maximum power level and that communicates in a wireless communication network, the method comprising:

receiving, at the wireless communication entity, a radio resource assignment, the radio resource assignment includes resources in a frequency band;

varying an operational maximum power level of the schedulable wireless communication entity in accordance with a protocol state governing the schedulable wireless communication entity, the operational maximum power level limits an instantaneous power at which the schedulable wireless communication entity may transmit on the radio resource assigned;

wherein varying the operational maximum power level includes:

decreasing the operational maximum power level by a first adjustment if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and by a second adjustment if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a second protocol state as bandwidth allocated to it increases, an amount of the first adjustment and the second adjustment are dependent on the increase in bandwidth; and

increasing the operational maximum power level by a third adjustment if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in the first protocol state and by a fourth adjustment if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in the second protocol state as bandwidth allocated to it decreases, an amount of the third adjustment and the fourth adjustment are dependent on the decrease in bandwidth.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operational maximum power level is based on a difference between a rated maximum transmit power and maximum transmit power adjustment information based on the radio resource assignment from reference information stored on the schedulable wireless communication entity.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the operational maximum power level is based on a difference between a rated maximum transmit power and a function of a waveform power derating and an occupied bandwidth power derating.

4. The method of claim 1 ,

wherein the protocol state governing the schedulable wireless communication entity operates in at least two protocol states, and

wherein the radio resource assignment in a first protocol state is for a physical random access channel or a first physical uplink control channel and the radio resource assignment in a second protocol state is for a second physical uplink control channel or a physical uplink data channel.

5. The method of claim 1 , varying the operational maximum power level using a first adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and using a second adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a second protocol state based on distance to an adjacent frequency band.

6. The method of claim 1 , varying the operational maximum power level using a first adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and using a second adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a second protocol state based on a frequency band allocated to the wireless communication entity.

7. The method of claim 1 , de-rating the operational maximum power level by a first adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and by a second adjustment function if the schedulable wireless communication entity is in a second protocol state in accordance with frequency bands adjacent to the frequency band within which the radio resource was allocated.

8. A wireless communication entity schedulable in a wireless communication network, the wireless communication entity comprising:

a radio receiver, the radio receiver receiving radio resource assignment information including a bandwidth allocation;

a power amplifier;

a controller communicably coupled to the power amplifier, the controller varying an operational maximum power level of the wireless communication entity in accordance with a protocol state governing the wireless communication entity, wherein the operational maximum power level limits an instantaneous power at which the wireless communication entity may transmit on the radio resource assigned;

wherein varying the operational maximum power level includes:

decreasing the operational maximum power level by a first adjustment if the wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and by a second adjustment if the wireless communication entity is in a second protocol state as the size of the bandwidth allocation to the wireless communication entity increases, an amount of the first adjustment and the second adjustment are dependent on the increase in bandwidth; and

increasing the operational maximum power level by a third adjustment if the wireless communication entity is in the first protocol state and by a fourth adjustment if the wireless communication entity is in the second protocol state as the size of the bandwidth allocation to the wireless communication entity decreases, an amount of the third adjustment and the fourth adjustment are dependent on the decrease in bandwidth.

9. The entity of claim 8 , wherein the operational maximum power level is based on a rated maximum transmit power, wherein the rated maximum transmit power level corresponds to a power class supported by the wireless communication entity.

10. The entity of claim 8 , wherein the operational maximum power level is based on a difference between a rated maximum transmit power and maximum transmit power adjustment information based on the radio resource assignment from reference information stored on the wireless communication entity.

11. The entity of claim 8 , wherein the operational maximum power level is based on a difference between a rated maximum transmit power and a function of a waveform power derating and an occupied bandwidth power derating.

12. The entity of claim 8 wherein at least two protocol states are possible and the radio resource assignment information in a first protocol state is for a physical random access channel or a first physical uplink control channel and the radio resource assignment information in a second protocol state is for a second physical uplink control channel or a physical uplink data channel.

13. The entity of claim 8 , the radio resource assignment includes a time-frequency resource, the controller varying the operational maximum power level based on a waveform metric and the protocol state.

14. The entity of claim 8 ,

the radio resource assignment includes a time-frequency resource,

varying the operational maximum power level based on the allocated time-frequency resource and the protocol state.

15. The entity of claim 8 , the controller varying the instantaneous transmit power based on maximum power adjustment information received from the wireless communication network and a current protocol state of the wireless communication entity.

16. The entity of claim 8 , the radio resource assignment information including modulation information, varying the operational maximum power level based on the modulation information by a first adjustment if the wireless communication entity is in a first protocol state and by a second adjustment if it is in a second protocol state.

17. The entity of claim 8 , the bandwidth allocation includes multiple subcarriers, varying the operational maximum power level based on a number of subcarriers in the bandwidth allocation and the protocol state.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2014
From: LOVE, ROBERT T.; CLASSON, BRIAN K.; FERNANDES, EDGAR P.; KLOMSDORF, CARMIN W.; NANGIA, VIJAY; NORY, RAVIKIRAN; SCHWENT, DALE G.; STEWART, KENNETH A.; WILSON, DAVID R.
To: MOTOROLA, INC.
Reel/Frame 034364/0562 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2014
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
To: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 034500/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 17, 2014
From: MOTOROLA, INC.
To: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Reel/Frame 034191/0550 →
CERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION Recorded Nov 17, 2014
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
To: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Reel/Frame 034387/0619 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation 11337753 · Jan 23, 2006
Related Publication 20120172081A1 · Jul 5, 2012