IP Library Granted Patent US 8,478,531
Granted Patent B2
US 8,478,531 · App. 12/798,594 · Granted Jul 2, 2013

Dip-based corrections for data reconstruction in three-dimensional surface-related multiple prediction

Inventors: Peter A. Aaron (Katy, TX); Roald G. van Borselen (Voorschoten, NL); Robertus F. Hegge (Rijswijk, NL); Simon R. Barnes (Mortimer, GB)
Assignee: PGS Geophysical AS
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,478,531
App. No.
12/798,594
Granted
Jul 2, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A best fitting trace in seismic data is determined for a desired trace to be reconstructed. A dip-based correction is calculated per trace and per sample for differences in azimuth, common midpoint coordinates, and offset between the best fitting trace and the desired trace. The dip-based correction is applied to the best fitting trace to reconstruct the desired trace for 3D surface-related multiple prediction.

Claims (369)

1. A method for marine seismic data reconstruction for 3D surface-related multiple prediction using a programmable computer that is programmed to perform the following:

determining a best fitting trace in the seismic data for a desired trace to be reconstructed;

calculating a dip-based correction per sample for differences in azimuth, common midpoint coordinates, and offset between the best fitting trace and the desired trace; and

applying the dip-based correction to the best fitting trace to reconstruct the desired trace for 3D surface-related multiple prediction.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction comprises:

calculating a dip-based correction for the best fitting trace and the corresponding desired trace, based upon half-offset, azimuth, arrival time, slowness, common midpoint coordinates, dip, and dip direction.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for azimuth differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

ϕ

=

-

(

h

)

2

2

t

p

2

sin

(

ϕ

b

-

ϕ

d

)

sin

(

ϕ

b

+

ϕ

d

-

2

p

θ

)

,

,

with

p

=

(

t

x

)

2

+

(

t

y

)

2

and

p

θ

=

cos

-

1

(

t

x

p

)

,

where h′ is the half-offset, t is the arrival time, p is slowness, θ is dip direction, φ is source-receiver azimuth and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for offset differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

h

=

2

h

d

Δ

h

t

p

2

cos

2

(

ϕ

d

-

p

θ

)

,

where h′ is the half-offset, Δh′=h′ b −h′ d is the difference in half-offsets, t is the arrival time, p is slowness, θ is dip direction, φ is source-receiver azimuth and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for common midpoint location differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ t cmp =|p |(Δ x cmp cos( p θ )+Δ y cmp sin( p θ )),

where p is slowness, θ is dip direction, Δx cmp =x b cmp −x d cmp is the difference in the x coordinate between common midpoint locations, Δy cmp =y b cmp −y d cmp is the difference in the y coordinate between common midpoint locations and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining a best fitting trace further comprising:

obtaining seismic data in a (x CMP , y CMP , h, φ, t) format;

determining a predominant dip in x and y directions for common midpoint coordinates x CMP and y CMP and arrival time t in each trace in the seismic data;

applying a filter to the dips to smooth discontinuities;

selecting a set of desired traces to reconstruct; and

determining a best fitting trace from the seismic data for each desired trace in the selected set of traces.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the applied filter is a median filter.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the determining a best fitting trace comprises minimizing a difference Φ in a weighted sum of differences in common midpoint x and y positions x CMP and y CMP , offset h, and azimuth φ between the best fitting and desired traces.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the minimizing a difference Φ comprises applying the following equation:

Φ=α| x b CMP −x d CMP |+α|y b CMP −y d CMP |+β|h b −h d |+ε|φ b −φ d |,

where α, β and ε are user-defined weights, and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the minimizing a difference Φ comprises applying the following equation:

Φ=α| x b CMP −x d CMP |+α|y b CMP −y d CMP |+β|h b −h d |

where α and β are user-defined weights, and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction comprises: calculating a dip-based correction for the best fitting trace and the corresponding desired trace, based upon half-offset, azimuth, arrival time, velocity, common midpoint coordinates, dip, and dip direction.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for azimuth differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

ϕ

=

-

2

h

2

v

2

t

d

sin

2

(

ψ

)

sin

(

ϕ

b

-

ϕ

d

)

sin

(

ϕ

b

+

ϕ

d

-

2

θ

)

,

where h′ is half-offset, v is velocity of the medium, t is arrival time, ψ is dip angle, φ is source-receiver azimuth, θ is dip direction and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for offset differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

h

=

2

v

2

t

d

2

h

d

Δ

h

sin

2

(

ψ

)

cos

2

(

ϕ

d

-

θ

)

,

where v is velocity of the medium, t is arrival time, h′ is half-offset, Δh′=h′ b −h′ d is the difference in half-offsets, ψ is dip angle, φ is source-receiver azimuth, and θ is dip direction subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for midpoint differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

cmp

=

2

sin

(

ψ

)

v

(

Δ

x

cmp

cos

(

θ

)

+

Δ

y

cmp

sin

(

θ

)

)

,

where v is velocity, ψ is dip angle, Δx cmp =x b cmp −x d cmp is the difference in the x coordinate between common midpoint locations, Δy cmp =y b cmp −y d cmp is the difference in the y coordinate between common midpoint locations, θ is dip direction and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein the calculating a dip-based correction for midpoint differences comprises applying the following equation:

Δ

t

cmp

=

4

sin

(

ψ

)

v

2

t

d

v

2

t

d

2

4

+

h

′2

sin

2

(

ψ

)

cos

2

(

ϕ

d

-

θ

)

(

Δ

x

CMP

cos

(

θ

)

+

Δ

yCMP

sin

(

θ

)

)

,

where ψ is dip angle, v is velocity, t is arrival time, h′ is half-offset, φ is source-receiver azimuth, Δx cmp =x b cmp −x d cmp is the difference in the x coordinate between common midpoint locations, Δy cmp =y b cmp −y d cmp is the difference in the y coordinate between common midpoint locations, θ is dip direction and subscripts b and d denote best fitting and desired traces, respectively.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2010
From: AARON, PETER A.; VAN BORSELEN, ROALD G.; HEGGE, ROBERTUS F.; BARNES, SIMON R.
To: PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS
Reel/Frame 024771/0493 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation In Part 12657412 · Jan 20, 2010
Related Publication 20110178715A1 · Jul 21, 2011