IP Library Granted Patent US 8,478,534
Granted Patent B2
US 8,478,534 · App. 10/868,387 · Granted Jul 2, 2013

Method for detecting discriminatory data patterns in multiple sets of data and diagnosing disease

Inventors: Wei Zhu (Stony Brook, NY); Xuena Wang (Stony Brook, NY); John S. Kovach (Setauket, NY)
Assignee: The Research Foundation For The State University of New York
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,478,534
App. No.
10/868,387
Granted
Jul 2, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A comprehensive analysis procedure for analyzing and comparing multiple sets of data to detect hidden discriminatory data patterns. The inventive procedure identifies a best subset of markers for optimal discrimination between two or more sets of data. A point-wise test on two or more sets of data is performed to calculate test statistic values and to generate a statgram, a two- or higher- dimensional map of the test statistic values along the range of data. A threshold is then determined for isolating critical regions of the statgram at each significance level to provide candidate markers. A subset of markers from the candidate markers is then selected to discriminate among the sets of data. The two or more sets of data are classified using the subset of markers.

Claims (94)

1. A method for analyzing biological samples for the classification of multiple sets of mass spectrometer data derived from the biological samples, each set of mass spectrometer data comprising a plurality of candidate markers and each candidate marker being described uniquely by one or more coordinates, the method comprising:

for at least a portion of the biological samples, perform the steps of:

ionizing the biological sample to produce ions; and

detecting the ions by use of a mass spectrometer, to produce mass spectrometer data;

the method further comprising the steps of:

selecting a training set of mass spectrometer data, the training set of mass spectrometer data comprising a plurality of sets of mass spectrometer data from two or more groups of mass spectrometer data representing known conditions selected from the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data;

performing a point-wise test on the training set of mass spectrometer data to calculate a plurality of test statistic values for the candidate markers;

determining a threshold test statistic value using a multiple-test correction method based on the size of the training set of mass spectrometer data and a selected significance level;

selecting those candidate markers having a test statistic value with an absolute value that exceeds the threshold;

selecting a subset of markers from the candidate markers using a best k-subset discriminant method to discriminate among the two or more groups; and

classifying a testing set of mass spectrometer data comprising a plurality of sets of mass spectrometer data into the two or more groups using the subset of markers; and

outputting a result of the classifying step to a computer readable medium,

wherein at least one candidate marker has a test statistic value with an absolute value that exceeds the threshold test statistic value.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein classifying includes determining a quantitative difference in the subset of markers between the plurality of sets of mass spectrometer data comprising the testing set of mass spectrometer data.

3. The method of claim 1 , comprising standardizing the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data.

4. The method of claim 1 , comprising randomly selecting the training set of mass spectrometer data from the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data.

5. The method of claim 1 , comprising presmoothing the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data with a Gaussian kernel.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data comprise spectral mass spectrometer data.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a threshold includes performing multiple-test correction of at least one of the multiple sets of mass spectrometer data.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein performing multiple-test correction includes performing at least one of a random field theory, a Gaussian random field, and a t random field multiple-test correction.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting a subset of markers includes eliminating any duplicative markers.

10. The method of claim 1 , comprising checking the candidate markers for variance stability.

11. The method of claim 1 , comprising checking the subset of markers for variance stability.

12. A method of detecting cancer from mass spectrometer data of biological samples, comprising:

for at least a portion of the biological samples, perform the steps of:

ionizing the biological sample to produce ions; and

detecting the ions by use of a mass spectrometer, to produce mass spectrometer data;

the method further comprising the steps of:

normalizing and smoothing the mass spectrometer data, to produce standardized and smoothed data;

randomly sampling data that has been standardized and smoothed to divide the standardized and smoothed data into a training set of mass spectrometer data and a testing set of mass spectrometer data, each of the training set and the testing set comprising random samples from subjects affected and unaffected by the disease;

performing a point-wise test on the training set of mass spectrometer data to determine test statistic values indicative of the difference between corresponding mass spectrometer data values of the samples of the affected and the unaffected subjects;

determining a threshold test statistic value using a multiple-test correction method based on the size of the training set of mass spectrometer data and a selected significance level;

selecting candidate markers having mass spectrometer data values, the mass spectrometer data values having a test statistic value with an absolute value that exceeds the threshold;

selecting a subset of markers from the candidate markers using a best k-subset discriminant method to discriminate between the affected and the unaffected samples of the training set; and

classifying the testing set of mass spectrometer data as representing affected or unaffected samples using the subset of markers; and

outputting the result of the classifying step to a computer readable medium,

wherein at least one candidate marker has a test statistic value with an absolute value that exceeds the threshold test statistic value.

13. The method of claim 12 , comprising classifying mass spectrometer data of a test-biological sample as being affected or unaffected using the subset of markers.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the mass spectrometer data of biological samples comprises spectral intensity values in a spectrum for each of the biological samples, the method comprising pre-processing the mass spectrometer data of biological samples to standardize and smooth the spectral intensity values across the spectrum for each of the biological samples.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein pre-processing includes presmoothing the mass spectrometer data with a Gaussian kernel.

16. The method of claim 12 , wherein the test statistic value t(x) for the corresponding data values y 1 (x) and y 2 (x) corresponding to x is:

t

(

x

)

=

y

1

(

x

)

_

-

y

2

(

x

)

_

s

1

2

(

x

)

/

n

1

+

s

2

2

(

x

)

/

n

2

where y 1 (x), y 2 (x), s 1 2 (x), s 2 2 (x) are the means and variances, respectively, of the affected and unaffected samples of the training set and n 1 and n 2 are the numbers of affected and unaffected samples, respectively, in the training set.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein determining a threshold test statistic value includes performing multiple-test correction of the mass spectrometer data of the training set.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein selecting a subset of markers includes eliminating any duplicative markers.

19. The method of claim 12 , comprising checking the candidate markers for variance stability.

20. The method of claim 12 , comprising checking the subset of markers for variance stability.

21. The method of claim 12 , wherein classifying the testing set includes using normal kernel density estimates with unequal bandwidth of the subset of markers.

22. The method of claim 13 , wherein classifying mass spectrometer data of the biological sample includes determining a change in a state of the disease using the subset of markers.

23. The method of claim 1 , comprising clustering mass spectrometer data.

24. The method of claim 1 , comprising clustering markers.

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the multiple sets of biological mass spectrometer data comprise multiple sets of ovarian cancer mass spectrometer data.

26. The method of claim 12 , wherein the disease is ovarian cancer.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 9, 2004
From: ZHU, WEI; WANG, XUENA; KOVACH, JOHN S.
To: RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, THE
Reel/Frame 015784/0385 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 60477529 · Jun 11, 2003
Provisional Application 60553433 · Mar 15, 2004
Related Publication 20050022168A1 · Jan 27, 2005