Method for optimising the firing trigger of a weapon or artillery
The invention relates to a method for determining a favourable moment for triggering the firing of a weapon on a moving target. According to said method, firing commands and expected impact points (P 1 -P 3 ) of a projectile and the target ( 2 ) are calculated with the aid of an algorithm, without actually triggering a firing burst. The target ( 2 ) is selected, the algorithm is activated and hypothetical data is determined. The process is aided by a graphical display ( 4 ) of the data. In the preferred embodiments, additional information is taken into account and/or is visualised for a user ( 5 ).
1. A method for determining an advantageous moment for firing initiation at moving targets, wherein firing commands and hit points to be expected by a projectile with the target are calculated by means of an algorithm from an actual firing without actually having to initiate a firing burst, comprising the steps of:
searching for the target,
applying said algorithm to said target to determine data hypothetically, said data being the continuous calculation and collection of firing commands and predicted hit points of hypothetical projectiles associated therewith,
determining actual target position, after a calculated flight time of each hypothetical projectile,
calculating a miss distance between the target and a previously calculated hit point, resulting in a statement as to how accurate each hypothetical projectile would have been, and
indicating an advantageous moment for initiating firing when said calculated miss distance is stabilized at a low value.
2. The method as defined in claim 1 , wherein the indicating step includes displaying the data graphically and on a display.
3. The method as defined in claim 2 , including producing the graphic display with visible development of the miss distance.
4. The method as defined in claim 2 , including using graphic curves over the time which corresponds to a correlation time of the response.
5. The method as defined in claim 1 , including using real and current, or quasi-current, additional information.
6. The method as defined in claim 5 , including additionally making data available graphically with T F /2 as a curve element, wherein T F is projectable flight time.
7. The method as defined in claim 5 , including using estimated accelerations, and continuously updating the accelerations with the aid of the latest target measurement.
8. The method as defined in claim 5 , further including displaying the data graphically and on a display and overlaying a video image of the target on the display diagram on the display.