IP Library Granted Patent US 8,620,731
Granted Patent B2
US 8,620,731 · App. 10/700,686 · Granted Dec 31, 2013

Inverted tier rebate system

Inventor: David W. Nelms (Lake Forest, IL)
Assignee: Discover Financial Services LLC
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,620,731
App. No.
10/700,686
Granted
Dec 31, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

An inverted tier award system for financial alternatives to currency is presented, wherein a consumer using the financial alternative to currency is rewarded based on the purchases made by the consumer within a given time frame. Award rates can vary based on the total value of purchases made within a given time frame, with higher award rates assigned to lower value ranges to motivate those consumers to increase their purchases made using the financial alternative to currency. Additionally, higher award rates at lower value ranges can increase consumer loyalty and provide consumers access to their awards more quickly and more often. The award rates or award access can be modified to achieve greater profitability or to further other goals of the implementing organization.

Claims (37)

1. A system for determining an award amount accrued to a consumer due to at least one transaction, the transaction involving the consumer's use of a financial alternative to currency to purchase goods or services, the system comprising:

a database containing a data record of the transaction and an account record for the consumer, the account record including a dollar-value sum which includes the transaction amount; and

a computing device coupled to the database for accessing at least one of the records and for calculating the award amount, from either the dollar-value sum or the transaction amount, by applying thereto an award formula comprising a selected award rate from an inverted tier structure comprising

a first tier corresponding to a first value range of goods or services purchased and providing a first award rate and

a second tier corresponding to a second value range of goods or services purchased and providing a second award rate,

wherein the minimum of the second value range is higher than the maximum of the first value range and the second award rate is lower than the first award rate, the inverted tier structure being stored in the computing device.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein calculating the award amount comprises applying the first award rate to the total value of goods or services purchased that are within the first value range and applying the second award rate to the total value of goods or services purchased that are within the second value range.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first value range and the first award rate have been previously selected to increase spending by consumers who historically spend less than the maximum value in the first value range during a predetermined time period, and wherein the second value range and the second award rate have been previously selected to avoid significantly decreasing spending by consumers who historically spend at least the maximum value in the second value range.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the dollar-value sum corresponds to purchases made within a predetermined time frame.

5. The system of claim 1 , the computing device further for accessing an indication that the transaction involved a favored merchant, and wherein the inverted tier structure for use in calculating the award amount for the transaction with the favored merchant is a favored inverted tier structure comprising one or more of the following:

an increased maximum in the first value range;

an increased maximum in the second value range;

an increased first award rate; and

an increased second award rate.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the financial alternative to currency is a credit card.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the inverted tier structure comprises a third tier corresponding to a third value range of goods or services purchased and providing a third award rate, wherein the minimum of the third value range is higher than the maximum of the second value range and the third award rate is lower than the second award rate.

8. A method for determining an award amount accrued to a consumer due to at least one transaction, the transaction involving the consumer's use of a financial alternative to currency to purchase goods or services from a merchant, the method comprising:

receiving, through a network, information about the transaction, the information including the transaction amount;

storing the information about the transaction, including the transaction amount, in a database transaction record;

accessing with a computing device a database account record for the consumer, the account record including a dollar-value sum which includes the transaction amount; and

calculating with the computing device an award amount by applying to the dollar-value sum an award formula comprising a selected award rate from an inverted tier structure comprising:

a first tier corresponding to a first value range of goods or services purchased and providing a first award rate, and

a second tier corresponding to a second value range of goods or services purchased and providing a second award rate;

wherein the second value range is higher than the first value range and the second award rate is lower than the first award rate.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein calculating the award amount comprises applying the first award rate to the total value of goods or services purchased that are within the first value range and applying the second award rate to the total value of goods or services purchased that are within the second value range.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining the first value range and the first award rate so as to increase spending by consumers who historically spend less than the maximum value in the first value range during a billing period; and

determining the second value range and the second award rate so as to avoid significantly decreasing spending by consumers who historically spend at least the maximum value in the second value range.

11. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

determining, by the computing device, that the transaction involved a favored merchant;

wherein the calculating step comprises applying a selected award rate from a favored inverted tier structure comprising one or more of the following:

an increased maximum in the first value range;

an increased maximum in the second value range;

an increased first award rate; and

an increased second award rate.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the financial alternative to currency is a credit card.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the inverted tier structure comprises a third tier corresponding to a third value range of goods or services purchased and providing a third award rate, wherein the minimum of the third value range is higher than the maximum of the second value range and the third award rate is lower than the second award rate.

Assignments (5)
MERGER Recorded Jul 2, 2025
From: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
To: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 071784/0903 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY DATA NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 014839 FRAME: 0173. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 6, 2022
From: NELMS, DAVID W.
To: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 059645/0056 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 7, 2010
From: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
To: DFS SERVICES LLC
Reel/Frame 023741/0637 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 10, 2006
From: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
To: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC
Reel/Frame 017596/0284 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 29, 2003
From: NELMS, DAVID W.
To: DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES
Reel/Frame 014839/0173 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20050096976A1 · May 5, 2005