IP Library Granted Patent US 8,761,949
Granted Patent B2
US 8,761,949 · App. 13/484,633 · Granted Jun 24, 2014

Method and system for mitigating impact of malfunction in actual load determination on peak load management

Inventor: Carl Mansfield (Camas, WA)
Assignee: Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,761,949
App. No.
13/484,633
Granted
Jun 24, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Method and system for mitigating the impact on peak load management of a malfunction in determining actual load at a site by substituting a predicted load for actual load while the malfunction persists. Using a predicted load as a substitute for actual load during the malfunction period avoids use of a grossly overestimated or underestimated actual load that if used could cause suboptimal use of battery power and decimate cost savings from peak load management.

Claims (33)

1. A peak load management system, comprising:

a battery system configured to store power and discharge stored power;

a measurement system configured to measure actual load; and

a peak load management controller operatively coupled with the battery system and the measurement system and configured to receive actual load data from the measurement system, detect malfunctions in determining actual load, compare an effective load and a target peak load and regulate a discharge of stored power from the battery system based at least in part on outcomes of comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load, wherein the management controller is further configured to use actual load as the effective load in first comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load and, in response to detecting a malfunction in determining actual load, substitute a predicted load for actual load as the effective load in second comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load, wherein the management controller is further configured to detect recoveries from malfunctions in determining actual load and, in response to detecting a recovery from the malfunction, substitute actual load for the predicted load as the effective load in third comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load.

2. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the management controller is further configured to compute the predicted load based at least in part on past actual load.

3. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the discharge of stored power from the battery system is regulated at least in part by discharging stored power from the battery system when actual load exceeds the target peak load.

4. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the discharge of stored power from the battery system is regulated at least in part by discharging stored power from the battery when the predicted load exceeds the target peak load.

5. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of the measurement system.

6. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of a communication channel between the measurement system and the management controller.

7. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of the management controller.

8. The management system of claim 1 , wherein the management controller is further configured to shed actual load in response to the malfunction.

9. The management system of claim 8 , wherein the management controller is configured to use weather data to determine an amount of actual load that is shed.

10. The management system of claim 1 , wherein actual load is a net load representing power consumed at a site reduced by power generated at the site.

11. A peak load management method, comprising the steps of:

measuring, by a peak load management system, actual load;

detecting, by the management system, a malfunction in determining actual load;

detecting, by the management system, a recovery from the malfunction in determining actual load;

comparing, by the management system, an effective load and a target peak load; and

regulating, by the management system, a discharge of stored battery power based at least in part on outcomes of comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load,

wherein the management system uses actual load as the effective load in first comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load and, in response to detecting the malfunction in determining actual load, substitutes a predicted load for actual load as the effective load in second comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load and, in response to detecting the recovery from the malfunction in determining actual load, substitutes actual load for the predicted load as the effective load in third comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load.

12. The management method of claim 11 , further comprising the step of:

detecting, by the management system, recoveries from malfunctions in determining actual load,

wherein the management system detects a recovery from the malfunction and, in response to detecting the recovery, substitutes actual load for the predicted load as the effective load in third comparisons of the effective load and the target peak load.

13. The management method of claim 11 , further comprising the step of computing, by the management system, the predicted load based at least in part on past actual load.

14. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the predicted load is an expected load on a worst case day of a billing period.

15. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the discharge of stored power from the battery system is regulated at least in part by discharging stored power from the battery system when actual load exceeds the target peak load.

16. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the discharge of stored power from the battery system is regulated at least in part by discharging stored power from the battery when the predicted load exceeds the target peak load.

17. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of a measurement system.

18. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of a communication channel between a measurement system and a management controller.

19. The management method of claim 11 , wherein the malfunction comprises a malfunction of a management controller.

20. The management method of claim 11 , further comprising the step of shedding, by the management system, actual load in response to the malfunction.

21. The management method of claim 20 , wherein an amount of actual load that is shed is determined by the management system using weather data.

22. The management method of claim 11 , wherein actual load is a net load representing power consumed at a site reduced by power generated at the site.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2018
From: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
To: NANTENERGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 047789/0215 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 27, 2018
From: SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA (SHARP CORPORATION)
To: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 047596/0690 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 16, 2014
From: SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA INC.
To: SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Reel/Frame 033322/0949 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2012
From: MANSFIELD, CARL, MR
To: SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 028295/0377 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20130325198A1 · Dec 5, 2013