IP Library Granted Patent US 8,764,650
Granted Patent B2
US 8,764,650 · App. 13/267,842 · Granted Jul 1, 2014

Methods and systems for measuring and communicating pain and distress level

Inventors: Martin Schiavenato (Rochester, NY); Laurel H. Carney (Geneva, NY); Scott Seidman (Fairport, NY)
Assignee: University of Rochester
G06F19/30A61B5/4824G06F19/322G06F19/3431
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,764,650
App. No.
13/267,842
Granted
Jul 1, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods are described for communicating the distress or pain experienced by an infant or a non-communicative patient. The systems and methods can provide an objective quantification of pain and/or distress in conjunction with, e.g., various distressing procedures commonly found in the newborn intensive care unit (NICU). The systems may include a processor in communication with a distress level input device and a display configured to provide a representation of a pain or distress score calculated in the processor. The processor may include executable code to translate data from the distress level input into the distress score.

Claims (36)

1. A method of communicating a pain level of a patient, comprising:

acquiring objective measurements of two parameters of the patient associated with the pain level and a first procedure, the parameters selected from the group consisting of heart rate variability, facial grimacing, and hand flexing;

scaling the objective measurements, according to magnitude estimation or a generalized labeled magnitude scale, to obtain logarithmically scaled scores;

determining, by a processor and based on the scaled scores, a pain score;

displaying a representation of the pain score;

calculating, by a processor, a future pain score by applying a decay rate according to a procedure load index based on data from another patient; and

displaying a representation of the future pain score.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein acquiring the objective measurements of the two parameters associated with the pain level further comprises acquiring a signal corresponding to heart rate variability of the patient.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein acquiring the objective measurements of the two parameters associated with the pain level further comprises acquiring a signal corresponding to facial grimacing of the patient.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein acquiring the objective measurements of the two parameters associated with the pain level further comprises acquiring a signal corresponding to hand flexing of the patient.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a pain score comprises one of adding the two parameters, applying Boolean logic to the two parameters, or processing the two parameters with a neural network.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the representation of the pain score comprises a visual representation.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the visual representation comprises visible light.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the visible light is emitted from a ball or orb.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: calculating a time when a combination of the future pain score and a second pain score associated with a second procedure will fall below a predetermined limit, wherein the second pain score is determined according to the procedure load index.

10. A system for measuring and communicating pain level comprising:

a sensory level input device configured to acquire objective measurements of two parameters selected from the group consisting of heart rate variability, facial grimacing, and hand flexing;

a processor communicably coupled to the sensory level input device, the processor having executable code configured to (i) scale the objective measurements, according to magnitude estimation or a generalized labeled magnitude scale, to obtain logarithmically scaled scores, (ii) determine, based on the scaled scores, a pain score, and (iii) calculate a future pain score by applying a decay rate according to a procedure load index based on data from another patient; and

a display configured to provide a representation of the pain score and a representation of the future pain score.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the sensory level input device is configured to provide data about the parameters.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the sensory level input device comprises two of an electrocardiogram monitor configured to provide data about heart rate variability, a facial electromyography monitor configured to provide data about facial grimacing, or a hand flexure sensor to provide data about hand flexing.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein the sensory level input device is further configured to acquire an objective measurement of, a galvanic skin response, an electroencephalography signal, or a near-infrared spectroscopy signal.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor utilizes the procedure load index to determine the pain score.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein the display provides a visual representation of the pain score.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the display comprises a ball or orb, and the visual representation comprises a colored light emitted from the ball or orb.

17. The system of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to calculate a time when a combination of the future pain score and a second pain score associated with a second procedure will fall below a predetermined limit, wherein the second pain score is determined according to the procedure load index.

18. A method of measuring distress in a patient, comprising:

acquiring objective indications of two parameters associated with a distress level of the patient, the parameters being selected from the group consisting of heart rate of the patient, facial electromyography of the patient, and hand flexing of the patient;

scaling the objective indications, according to magnitude estimation or a generalized labeled magnitude scale, to obtain logarithmically scaled scores;

determining, based on the scaled scores, a distress score;

displaying a representation of the distress score on a display;

calculating, by a processor, a future distress score by applying a decay rate according to a procedure load index based on data from another patient; and

displaying a representation of the future distress score.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein acquiring the objective indications of the distress level of the patient comprises assigning the distress level based on selection of a particular distressing procedure.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein translating data from the objective indications of the distress level into the distress score comprises looking up a pre-determined distress level associated with the particular distressing procedure in the procedure load index.

21. The method of claim 18 , further comprising: calculating a time when a combination of the future distress score and a second distress score associated with a second procedure will fall below a predetermined limit, wherein the second distress score is determined according to the procedure load index.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 23, 2011
From: SCHIAVENATO, MARTIN; CARNEY, LAUREL H.; SEIDMAN, SCOTT
To: UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
Reel/Frame 027441/0815 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 61390482 · Oct 6, 2010
Provisional Application 61409037 · Nov 1, 2010
Related Publication 20120088985A1 · Apr 12, 2012