IP Library Granted Patent US 8,774,819
Granted Patent B2
US 8,774,819 · App. 12/854,495 · Granted Jul 8, 2014

Method and apparatus for contention-based uplink data transmission

Inventors: Guodong Zhang (Syosset, NY); Afshin Haghighat (Ile-Bizard, CA); Erdem Bala (Farmingdale, NY); David S. Bass (Great Neck, NY); Paul Marinier (Brossard, CA); Marian Rudolf (Montreal, CA); Stephen E. Terry (Northport, NY)
Assignee: InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,774,819
App. No.
12/854,495
Granted
Jul 8, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) to use a contention-based uplink communications channel, applies a rule-based restriction of access to the contention-based uplink channel that attempts to use at least one contention-free uplink channel allocation for uplink transmissions on a condition that at least one contention-free uplink channel allocation has been granted.

Claims (26)

1. A method implemented by a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) accessing a contention-based (CB) uplink communication channel, the method comprising:

deciding whether to send an uplink transmission using the CB uplink communication channel or a contention-free uplink channel allocation based on a rule-based restriction of access to the CB uplink communication channel;

restricting access to the CB uplink communication channel on a condition that at least one rule of the rule-based restriction is satisfied; and

on a condition that more than one uplink grant is received for a same sub-frame, deciding not to send an uplink transmission on the CB uplink communication channel on a condition that at least one uplink grant is received in a random access response.

2. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on a number of sub-frames since a scheduling request for a contention-free channel was transmitted.

3. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on a number of sub-frames since a successful transmission of a buffer status report (BSR).

4. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on transmission of an uplink shared channel within a set number of frames.

5. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising the WTRU monitoring statistics of uplink contention-based resource usage and uplink contention-free resource usage, where based on the monitoring, the WTRU determines whether to use the CB uplink communication channel or determines a probability of access to the CB uplink communication channel.

6. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising the WTRU transmitting data on the CB uplink communication channel; and cancelling a triggered BSR.

7. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the WTRU has a pending scheduling request (SR), further comprising receiving a valid CB uplink grant; transmitting on a CB uplink communication channel in a sub-frame; and cancelling a random access channel (RACH) preamble transmission in the sub-frame.

8. The method as in claim 1 , wherein the WTRU has a pending scheduling request (SR), further comprising receiving a valid CB uplink grant; transmitting a RACH preamble in a sub-frame; and prohibiting transmission on the CB uplink communication channel in the sub-frame.

9. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising receiving more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; wherein the WTRU does not transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that at least one contention-free grant is received for a cell radio network temporary identifier (C-RNTI) or a temporary C-RNTI of the WTRU.

10. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising receiving more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; wherein the WTRU does not transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that at least one uplink grant is received to initialize semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) on a contention-free uplink channel for the WTRU's SPS cell radio network temporary identifier (C-RNTI).

11. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising receiving more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; wherein the WTRU does not transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that the WTRU is to perform a non-adaptive retransmission in the sub-frame in response to receiving a NACK.

12. A wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU), comprising a processor configured to access a contention-based (CB) uplink communication channel, and decide whether to send an unlink transmission using a the CB uplink communication channel or a contention-free uplink channel allocation based on a rule-based restriction of access to the CB uplink communication channel, and restrict access to the CB uplink communication channel on a condition that at least one rule of the rule-based restriction is satisfied; and

the processor further configured to decide not to send an uplink transmission on the CB uplink communication channel on a condition that more than one uplink grant is received for a same sub-frame and that at least one uplink grant is received in a random access response.

13. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on a number of sub-frames since a scheduling request was transmitted.

14. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on a number of sub-frames since a successful transmission of a buffer status report (BSR).

15. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the rule-based restriction is based on transmission of an uplink shared channel within a set number of frames.

16. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to monitor statistics of uplink contention-based resource usage and uplink contention-free resources usage, where based on the monitoring, the processor determines whether to use the CB uplink communication channel or determines a probability of access to the CB uplink communication channel.

17. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to transmit data on the CB uplink communication channel; and cancel a triggered BSR.

18. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor has a pending scheduling request (SR), the processor further configured to receive a valid CB uplink grant; transmit on a CB uplink communication channel in a sub-frame; and cancel a random access channel (RACH) preamble transmission in the sub-frame.

19. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor has a pending scheduling request (SR), the processor further configured to receive a valid CB uplink grant; transmit a RACH preamble in a sub-frame; and prohibit transmission on the CB uplink communication channel in the sub-frame.

20. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to receive more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; and the processor decides not to transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that at least one contention-free grant is received for a cell radio network temporary identifier (C-RNTI) or a temporary C-RNTI of the WTRU.

21. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to receive more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; and the processor decides not to transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that at least one uplink grant is received to initialize semi-persistent scheduling (SPS) on a contention-free uplink channel for the WTRU's SPS cell radio network temporary identifier (C-RNTI).

22. The WTRU as in claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to receive more than one uplink grant for a sub-frame; and the processor decides not to transmit on the CB uplink communication channel on condition that the WTRU is to perform a non-adaptive retransmission in the sub-frame in response to receiving a NACK.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR'S. PLEASE ADD THE ASSIGNOR STEPHEN E. TERRY, EXECUTION DATE 10/07/2010. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 025813 FRAME 0965. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST. Recorded Aug 22, 2011
From: ZHANG, GUODONG; HAGHIGHAT, AFSHIN; BALA, ERDEM; BASS, DAVID S.; MARINIER, PAUL; RUDOLF, MARIAN; TERRY, STEPHEN E.
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 026787/0447 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE DOC DATE OF ASSIGNOR MARIAN RUDOLF TO READ 09/29/2010 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 025181 FRAME 0642. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST. Recorded Feb 17, 2011
From: ZHANG, GUODONG; HAGHIGHAT, AFSHIN; BALA, ERDEM; BASS, DAVID S.; MARINIER, PAUL; RUDOLF, MARIAN
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025813/0965 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2010
From: ZHANG, GUODONG; HAGHIGHAT, AFSHIN; BALA, ERDEM; BASS, DAVID S.; MARINIER, PAUL; RUDOLF, MARIAN; TERRY, STEPHEN E.
To: INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025181/0642 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 61233359 · Aug 12, 2009
Provisional Application 61233736 · Aug 13, 2009
Related Publication 20110039568A1 · Feb 17, 2011