IP Library Granted Patent US 8,849,539
Granted Patent B2
US 8,849,539 · App. 13/377,196 · Granted Sep 30, 2014

Method and module for determining of velocity reference values for a vehicle control system

Inventors: Oskar Johansson (Stockholm, SE); Jörgen Hansson (Hägersten, SE)
Assignee: Scania CV AB
B60W10/06Y02T10/52B60W2720/103B60W30/143B60W10/10B60W2720/10B60W2250/402B60W40/06
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,849,539
App. No.
13/377,196
Granted
Sep 30, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determination of speed set-point values v ref for a vehicle's control systems, includes determining a horizon from position data and map data of an itinerary made up of route segments with length and gradient characteristics for each segment; calculating threshold values for the gradient of segments according to one or more vehicle-specific values, which threshold values serve as boundaries for assigning segments to various categories; comparing the gradient of each segment with the threshold values and placing each segment within the horizon in a category according to the results of the comparisons; calculating speed set-point values v ref for the vehicle's control systems across the horizon according to rules pertaining to the classes in which segments within the horizon are placed; adding an offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is in a segment which is in a category indicating a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade; regulating the vehicle according to the speed set-point values v ref . A module determines of speed set-point values for a vehicle's control systems.

Claims (32)

1. A method for determination of speed set-point values v ref for a vehicle's control systems, the method comprising:

A) determining a horizon using position data and map data of an itinerary made up of route segments with length and gradient characteristics for each segment;

B) calculating threshold values for the gradient of segments according to one or more vehicle-specific values, which threshold values serve as boundaries for assigning segments to various categories;

C) comparing the gradient of each segment with the threshold values and placing each segment within the horizon in a category according to the results of the comparisons;

D) calculating speed set-point values v ref for the vehicle's control systems across the horizon according to rules pertaining to the categories in which segments within the horizon are placed;

E) adding an offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is in a segment which is in a category indicating a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade; and

F) regulating the vehicle according to the speed set-point values v ref .

2. A method according to claim 1 , in which a positive offset v offset is added to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is on a steep upgrade.

3. A method according to claim 1 , in which a negative offset v offset is added to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is on a steep downgrade.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said offset v offset is a variable value over time.

5. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising when a first steep upgrade or a first steep downgrade is followed by a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade within a certain distance L, not allowing both acceleration and retardation of the vehicle within the section L.

6. A method according to claim 1 , wherein vehicle-specific values are determined by current transmission ratio, current vehicle weight, the engine's maximum torque curve, mechanical friction and/or the vehicle's running resistance at a current speed.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein threshold values are calculated in the form of gradient threshold values l min and l max .

8. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the horizon is determined by using position data from a GPS.

9. A module for determining speed set-point values for a vehicle's control systems, the module comprising:

a horizon unit configured and operable to determine a horizon using position data and map data of an itinerary made up of route segments with length and gradient characteristics for each segment;

a processor unit configured and operable to: calculate threshold values for the gradient of segments according to one or more vehicle-specific values, which threshold values serve as boundaries for assigning segments to various categories; compare the gradient of each segment with the threshold values and placing each segment within the horizon in a category according to the results of the comparisons; calculate speed set-point values v ref for the vehicle's control systems across the horizon according to rules pertaining to the categories in which segments within the horizon are placed; and configured and operable to add an offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is in a segment which is in a category indicating a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade, after which the vehicle is regulated according to the speed set-point values v ref .

10. A module according to claim 9 , in which the processor unit is configured and operable to add a positive offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is on a steep upgrade.

11. A module according to claim 9 , wherein the processor unit is configured and operable to add a negative offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is on a steep downgrade.

12. A module according to claim 9 , wherein said offset v offset is a variable value over time.

13. A module according to claim 9 , wherein when a first steep upgrade or a first steep downgrade is followed by a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade within a certain distance L, the processor unit is configured and operable to not allow both acceleration and retardation of the vehicle within the section L.

14. A module according to claim 9 , wherein vehicle-specific values are determined by current transmission ratio, current vehicle weight, the engine's maximum torque curve, mechanical friction and/or the vehicle's running resistance at a current speed.

15. A module according to claim 9 , wherein the processor unit is configured and operable to calculate threshold values in the form of gradient threshold values l min and l max .

16. A module according to claim 9 , wherein the horizon unit is configured and operable to determine the horizon by using position data from a GPS.

17. A computer program product comprising computer program instructions for enabling a computer system in a vehicle to perform a method for determination of speed set-point values v ref for a vehicle's control systems, the method comprising:

A) determining a horizon using position data and map data of an itinerary made up of route segments with length and gradient characteristics for each segment;

B) calculating threshold values for the gradient of segments according to one or more vehicle-specific values, which threshold values serve as boundaries for assigning segments to various categories;

C) comparing the gradient of each segment with the threshold values and placing each segment within the horizon in a category according to the results of the comparisons;

D) calculating speed set-point values v ref for the vehicle's control systems across the horizon according to rules pertaining to the categories in which segments within the horizon are placed;

E) adding an offset v offset to the calculated speed set-point values v ref when the vehicle is in a segment which is in a category indicating a steep upgrade or a steep downgrade; and

F) regulating the vehicle according to the speed set-point values v ref ,

wherein the computer program instructions are stored on a non-transitory medium which is readable by a computer system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 9, 2011
From: JOHANSSON, OSKAR; HANSSON, JORGEN
To: SCANIA CV AB
Reel/Frame 027354/0784 →
Priority Claims (1)
SE 0950443 · Jun 10, 2009 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20120083984A1 · Apr 5, 2012