IP Library Granted Patent US 9,217,694
Granted Patent B2
US 9,217,694 · App. 10/576,453 · Granted Dec 22, 2015

Method for automatically generating laser cutting lines in laser microdissection processes

Inventors: Frank Sieckmann (Bochum, DE); Gerhard Johannsen (Wettenberg, DE)
Assignee: LEICA MICROSYSTEMS CMS GMBH
G01N1/2813G02B21/32G02B21/365G01N2001/288
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,217,694
App. No.
10/576,453
Granted
Dec 22, 2015
Kind
B2
Abstract

A laser microdissection method includes capturing an electronic image of an image detail of a specimen. The image detail is processed using, image analysis so as to automatically ascertain an object to be cut out. A nominal cutting line around the object to be cut out is automatically defined. Subsequently, the object is cut out in response to a relative motion between a laser beam and the specimen.

Claims (47)

1. A method for laser microdissection comprising:

capturing an electronic image of at least one image detail of a specimen;

processing the at least one image detail using image analysis so as to automatically ascertain at least one object to be cut out;

automatically calculating a contour of the at least one object;

automatically defining, based on the calculated contour, a nominal cutting line around the at least one object to be cut out; and

subsequently cutting out the at least one object in response to a relative motion between a laser beam and the specimen.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising preparing the electronic image for the processing using a contrasting method based on camera or microscope technology.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the processing the image detail is performed using a segmenting of the electronic image:

defining a grayscale threshold value on the basis of the electronic image; and

converting, by making a comparison with the grayscale value threshold, the electronic image to a binary image including only the at least one object segmented.

4. The method as recited in claim 3 wherein the defining a grayscale threshold value is performed by manually setting the threshold value or automatically defining the threshold value in an entropy maximization process.

5. The method as recited in claim 3 wherein the processing the image detail includes:

defining specific classification features characterizing the at least one object so as to ascertain the at least one object;

classifying the at least one object using image analysis by determining from the image actually existing object features of the at least one object segmented and comparing the existing object features to the defined specific classification features.

6. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the comparing is performed so as to determine whether the actually existing object features conform with the defined specific classification features.

7. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the defining specific classification features includes defining, in each instance for different object types, individual feature data records including the specific classification features.

8. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the defining specific classification features is performed automatically or manually in a learning process including inputting the classification features interactively or automatically by suitably marking the at least one object.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 wherein the marking is preformed using a mouse click.

10. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein automatically defining the nominal cutting line is performed so as to exclude unclassified objects.

11. The method as recited in claim 5 wherein the defining specific classification features includes defining a range of values for at least one of the specific classification features.

12. The method as recited in claim 5 further comprising excluding from the nominal cutting line objects, identified by the comparing the existing object features to the defined specific classification features, that border on an edge of the image detail or that are only partially visible in the image detail.

13. The method as recited in claim 3 further comprising removing a specific unwanted object of the at least one object from the binary image using image analysis morphology, the unwanted object being not designated for microdissection.

14. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the electronic image is either a grayscale image or a color image.

15. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the at least one object includes a plurality of objects disposed in close proximity to one another, and further comprising combining the plurality of objects into a cluster, and wherein the automatically defining a nominal cutting line is performed so as to define a single shared nominal cutting line surrounding the cluster.

16. The method as recited in claim 15 further comprising separately cutting out at least one region enclosed by the cluster and not belonging to the cluster.

17. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

applying a mathematical transformation so as to automatically map the nominal cutting line onto a laser cutting line; and

converting the laser cutting line into the relative motion between the laser beam and the specimen so as to provide a laser cut.

18. The method as recited in claim 17 further comprising initiating, by a user or automatically, the relative motion between the laser beam and the specimen.

19. The method as recited in claim 17 , wherein:

the contour is an outer contour of the at least one object;

the automatically calculating includes determining the outer contour of the at least one object using image analysis; and

the automatically defining includes converting the outer contour into a numerical code specifying the automatically defined nominal cutting line.

20. The method as recited in claim 19 wherein the numerical code is a Freeman code or a chain code.

21. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising performing an automatic shading correction including:

recording an empty image without a specimen;

storing the empty image as a shading correction image; and

applying an offset correction to the captured electronic image using the shading correction image.

22. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising providing a defined clearance distance in the specimen so as to prevent a neighboring object from being sliced through.

23. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising superimposing, by an imaging device, the nominal cutting line onto the electronic image so as to control results of the cutting out.

24. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

applying a mathematical transformation so as to automatically map the nominal cutting line onto a laser cutting line; and

scaling the laser cutting line as a function of the image magnification.

25. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising:

applying a mathematical transformation so as to automatically map the nominal cutting line onto a laser cutting line; and

setting a defined clearance distance of the laser cutting line from the at least one so as to protect the object from damage caused by laser irradiation.

26. The method as recited in claim 1 further comprising modifying the nominal cutting line so as to compensate for imprecise repositioning of the microscope stage.

Priority Claims (2)
DE 103 49 411 · Oct 21, 2003 · national
DE 10 2004 051 508 · Oct 21, 2004 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20070066967A1 · Mar 22, 2007